Tour de France versus Vuelta a Espana: which is harder?

A Lucia, J Hoyos, A Santalla, Conrad P Earnest, J L Chicharro

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

135 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the total exercise loads (intensity x volume) of the Vuelta a Espana and Tour de France during the last year.

METHODS: Seven professional road cyclists (28 +/- 1 yr; [OV0312]O(2max): 74.6 +/- 2.2 mL.kg-1.min-1) who participated in both Tour and Vuelta during the years 1997, 1999, 2000, or 2001 were collected as subjects. They wore a heart rate (HR) telemeter during each stage of the two races, and exercise intensity was divided into three phases according to the reference HR values obtained during a previous ramp cycle-ergometer test: phase I (<ventilatory threshold (VT)), phase II (between VT and the respiratory compensation point (RCP)) and phase III (>RCP). Total volume and intensity were integrated as a single variable. The score for volume x intensity in each phase was computed by multiplying the accumulated duration in this phase by a multiplier for this particular phase. The total score for Tour and Vuelta was obtained by summating the results of the three phases.

RESULTS: The total loads (volume x intensity) did not significantly differ between the two races (P > 0.05), despite a significantly longer total exercise time of the Tour (P < 0.05) (5552 +/- 176 vs 5086 +/- 290 min).

CONCLUSION: The physiological loads imposed on cyclists' bodies do not differ between the Tour and Vuelta, despite the longer duration of daily stages in the former race.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)872-878
Number of pages7
JournalMedicine and Science in Sports and Exercise
Volume35
Issue number5
Publication statusPublished - 2003

Fingerprint

France
Exercise
Heart Rate
Architectural Accessibility

Cite this

Lucia, A., Hoyos, J., Santalla, A., Earnest, C. P., & Chicharro, J. L. (2003). Tour de France versus Vuelta a Espana: which is harder? Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 35(5), 872-878.

Tour de France versus Vuelta a Espana: which is harder? / Lucia, A; Hoyos, J; Santalla, A; Earnest, Conrad P; Chicharro, J L.

In: Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, Vol. 35, No. 5, 2003, p. 872-878.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lucia, A, Hoyos, J, Santalla, A, Earnest, CP & Chicharro, JL 2003, 'Tour de France versus Vuelta a Espana: which is harder?', Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 872-878.
Lucia A, Hoyos J, Santalla A, Earnest CP, Chicharro JL. Tour de France versus Vuelta a Espana: which is harder? Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise. 2003;35(5):872-878.
Lucia, A ; Hoyos, J ; Santalla, A ; Earnest, Conrad P ; Chicharro, J L. / Tour de France versus Vuelta a Espana: which is harder?. In: Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise. 2003 ; Vol. 35, No. 5. pp. 872-878.
@article{2b4f7b2d53824664a7ac909eb33d61cb,
title = "Tour de France versus Vuelta a Espana: which is harder?",
abstract = "PURPOSE: To compare the total exercise loads (intensity x volume) of the Vuelta a Espana and Tour de France during the last year. METHODS: Seven professional road cyclists (28 +/- 1 yr; [OV0312]O(2max): 74.6 +/- 2.2 mL.kg-1.min-1) who participated in both Tour and Vuelta during the years 1997, 1999, 2000, or 2001 were collected as subjects. They wore a heart rate (HR) telemeter during each stage of the two races, and exercise intensity was divided into three phases according to the reference HR values obtained during a previous ramp cycle-ergometer test: phase I (RCP). Total volume and intensity were integrated as a single variable. The score for volume x intensity in each phase was computed by multiplying the accumulated duration in this phase by a multiplier for this particular phase. The total score for Tour and Vuelta was obtained by summating the results of the three phases. RESULTS: The total loads (volume x intensity) did not significantly differ between the two races (P > 0.05), despite a significantly longer total exercise time of the Tour (P < 0.05) (5552 +/- 176 vs 5086 +/- 290 min). CONCLUSION: The physiological loads imposed on cyclists' bodies do not differ between the Tour and Vuelta, despite the longer duration of daily stages in the former race.",
author = "A Lucia and J Hoyos and A Santalla and Earnest, {Conrad P} and Chicharro, {J L}",
year = "2003",
language = "English",
volume = "35",
pages = "872--878",
journal = "Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise",
issn = "0195-9131",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams & Wilkins",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Tour de France versus Vuelta a Espana: which is harder?

AU - Lucia, A

AU - Hoyos, J

AU - Santalla, A

AU - Earnest, Conrad P

AU - Chicharro, J L

PY - 2003

Y1 - 2003

N2 - PURPOSE: To compare the total exercise loads (intensity x volume) of the Vuelta a Espana and Tour de France during the last year. METHODS: Seven professional road cyclists (28 +/- 1 yr; [OV0312]O(2max): 74.6 +/- 2.2 mL.kg-1.min-1) who participated in both Tour and Vuelta during the years 1997, 1999, 2000, or 2001 were collected as subjects. They wore a heart rate (HR) telemeter during each stage of the two races, and exercise intensity was divided into three phases according to the reference HR values obtained during a previous ramp cycle-ergometer test: phase I (RCP). Total volume and intensity were integrated as a single variable. The score for volume x intensity in each phase was computed by multiplying the accumulated duration in this phase by a multiplier for this particular phase. The total score for Tour and Vuelta was obtained by summating the results of the three phases. RESULTS: The total loads (volume x intensity) did not significantly differ between the two races (P > 0.05), despite a significantly longer total exercise time of the Tour (P < 0.05) (5552 +/- 176 vs 5086 +/- 290 min). CONCLUSION: The physiological loads imposed on cyclists' bodies do not differ between the Tour and Vuelta, despite the longer duration of daily stages in the former race.

AB - PURPOSE: To compare the total exercise loads (intensity x volume) of the Vuelta a Espana and Tour de France during the last year. METHODS: Seven professional road cyclists (28 +/- 1 yr; [OV0312]O(2max): 74.6 +/- 2.2 mL.kg-1.min-1) who participated in both Tour and Vuelta during the years 1997, 1999, 2000, or 2001 were collected as subjects. They wore a heart rate (HR) telemeter during each stage of the two races, and exercise intensity was divided into three phases according to the reference HR values obtained during a previous ramp cycle-ergometer test: phase I (RCP). Total volume and intensity were integrated as a single variable. The score for volume x intensity in each phase was computed by multiplying the accumulated duration in this phase by a multiplier for this particular phase. The total score for Tour and Vuelta was obtained by summating the results of the three phases. RESULTS: The total loads (volume x intensity) did not significantly differ between the two races (P > 0.05), despite a significantly longer total exercise time of the Tour (P < 0.05) (5552 +/- 176 vs 5086 +/- 290 min). CONCLUSION: The physiological loads imposed on cyclists' bodies do not differ between the Tour and Vuelta, despite the longer duration of daily stages in the former race.

UR - http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12750600/

M3 - Article

VL - 35

SP - 872

EP - 878

JO - Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise

JF - Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise

SN - 0195-9131

IS - 5

ER -