Abstract
This article explores the role of the formal network centrality of top management teams (TMT) for foreign expansion, looking at the case of Chinese firms. The former is defined by the degree to which top managers are connected with TMTs of other firms in formal ways, through service as independent board members. We explore boundary conditions, comparing state ownership with political ties. The analysis of a panel data of 489 firms expanding to 72 developed and developing host markets in the period 2000–2012 confirms that network centrality facilitates internationalization. We found that TMT network centrality had a stronger effect on internationalization in developed than emerging markets. Conversely, state ownership had a positive moderating effect in the latter and political ties a negative effect in developed ones. The literature on comparative institutional analysis suggests that formal ties are more important in developed economies, and informal ties in emerging ones. However, formal political ties and/or links to the Chinese state may be more of value in internationalizing into other emerging markets, where the balance of diplomatic power may be more skewed in China's favor.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | 101803 |
Journal | International Business Review |
Volume | 30 |
Issue number | 3 |
Early online date | 27 Jan 2021 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 30 Jun 2021 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2021 Elsevier Ltd
Keywords
- Chinese firms
- Diplomatic FDI strategies
- Internationalization
- Networks
- Political ties
- State capitalism
- State ownership
- TMT network centrality
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Business and International Management
- Finance
- Marketing