Tool-use: Capturing multisensory spatial attention or extending multisensory peripersonal space?

Nicholas P. Holmes, Daniel Sanabria, Gemma A. Calvert, Charles Spence

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

69 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The active and skilful use of tools has been claimed to lead to the "extension" of the visual receptive fields of single neurons representing peripersonal space - the visual space immediately surrounding one's body parts. While this hypothesis provides an attractive and potentially powerful explanation for one neural basis of tool-use behaviours in human and nonhuman primates, a number of competing hypotheses for the reported behavioural effects of tool-use have not yet been subjected to empirical test. Here, we report five behavioural experiments in healthy human participants (n = 120) involving the effects of tool-use on visual-tactile interactions in peripersonal space. Specifically, we address the possibility that the use of only a single tool, which is typical of many neuropsychological studies of tool-use, induces a spatial allocation of attention towards the side where the tool is held. Participants' tactile discrimination responses were more strongly affected by visual stimuli presented on the right side when they held a single tool on the right, compared to visual stimuli presented on the left. When the use and/or manipulation of two tools were held, one in each hand, this spatial effect disappeared. Our results are incompatible with the hypothesis that tool-use extends peripersonal space, and suggest instead that tools results in an automatic multisensory shift of spatial attention to the side of space where the tip of the tool is actively held. These results have implications for many of the cognitive neuroscientific studies of tool-use published to date.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)469-489
Number of pages21
JournalCortex
Volume43
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2007

Fingerprint

Touch
Tool Use Behavior
Visual Fields
Human Body
Primates
Healthy Volunteers
Hand
Neurons
Discrimination (Psychology)

Cite this

Tool-use: Capturing multisensory spatial attention or extending multisensory peripersonal space? / Holmes, Nicholas P.; Sanabria, Daniel; Calvert, Gemma A.; Spence, Charles.

In: Cortex, Vol. 43, No. 3, 04.2007, p. 469-489.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Holmes, Nicholas P. ; Sanabria, Daniel ; Calvert, Gemma A. ; Spence, Charles. / Tool-use: Capturing multisensory spatial attention or extending multisensory peripersonal space?. In: Cortex. 2007 ; Vol. 43, No. 3. pp. 469-489.
@article{f90dc43de2c74178ad8e4aa1f3af98dc,
title = "Tool-use: Capturing multisensory spatial attention or extending multisensory peripersonal space?",
abstract = "The active and skilful use of tools has been claimed to lead to the {"}extension{"} of the visual receptive fields of single neurons representing peripersonal space - the visual space immediately surrounding one's body parts. While this hypothesis provides an attractive and potentially powerful explanation for one neural basis of tool-use behaviours in human and nonhuman primates, a number of competing hypotheses for the reported behavioural effects of tool-use have not yet been subjected to empirical test. Here, we report five behavioural experiments in healthy human participants (n = 120) involving the effects of tool-use on visual-tactile interactions in peripersonal space. Specifically, we address the possibility that the use of only a single tool, which is typical of many neuropsychological studies of tool-use, induces a spatial allocation of attention towards the side where the tool is held. Participants' tactile discrimination responses were more strongly affected by visual stimuli presented on the right side when they held a single tool on the right, compared to visual stimuli presented on the left. When the use and/or manipulation of two tools were held, one in each hand, this spatial effect disappeared. Our results are incompatible with the hypothesis that tool-use extends peripersonal space, and suggest instead that tools results in an automatic multisensory shift of spatial attention to the side of space where the tip of the tool is actively held. These results have implications for many of the cognitive neuroscientific studies of tool-use published to date.",
author = "Holmes, {Nicholas P.} and Daniel Sanabria and Calvert, {Gemma A.} and Charles Spence",
note = "ID number: ISI:000246606300018",
year = "2007",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70471-4",
language = "English",
volume = "43",
pages = "469--489",
journal = "Cortex",
issn = "0010-9452",
publisher = "Masson SpA",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Tool-use: Capturing multisensory spatial attention or extending multisensory peripersonal space?

AU - Holmes, Nicholas P.

AU - Sanabria, Daniel

AU - Calvert, Gemma A.

AU - Spence, Charles

N1 - ID number: ISI:000246606300018

PY - 2007/4

Y1 - 2007/4

N2 - The active and skilful use of tools has been claimed to lead to the "extension" of the visual receptive fields of single neurons representing peripersonal space - the visual space immediately surrounding one's body parts. While this hypothesis provides an attractive and potentially powerful explanation for one neural basis of tool-use behaviours in human and nonhuman primates, a number of competing hypotheses for the reported behavioural effects of tool-use have not yet been subjected to empirical test. Here, we report five behavioural experiments in healthy human participants (n = 120) involving the effects of tool-use on visual-tactile interactions in peripersonal space. Specifically, we address the possibility that the use of only a single tool, which is typical of many neuropsychological studies of tool-use, induces a spatial allocation of attention towards the side where the tool is held. Participants' tactile discrimination responses were more strongly affected by visual stimuli presented on the right side when they held a single tool on the right, compared to visual stimuli presented on the left. When the use and/or manipulation of two tools were held, one in each hand, this spatial effect disappeared. Our results are incompatible with the hypothesis that tool-use extends peripersonal space, and suggest instead that tools results in an automatic multisensory shift of spatial attention to the side of space where the tip of the tool is actively held. These results have implications for many of the cognitive neuroscientific studies of tool-use published to date.

AB - The active and skilful use of tools has been claimed to lead to the "extension" of the visual receptive fields of single neurons representing peripersonal space - the visual space immediately surrounding one's body parts. While this hypothesis provides an attractive and potentially powerful explanation for one neural basis of tool-use behaviours in human and nonhuman primates, a number of competing hypotheses for the reported behavioural effects of tool-use have not yet been subjected to empirical test. Here, we report five behavioural experiments in healthy human participants (n = 120) involving the effects of tool-use on visual-tactile interactions in peripersonal space. Specifically, we address the possibility that the use of only a single tool, which is typical of many neuropsychological studies of tool-use, induces a spatial allocation of attention towards the side where the tool is held. Participants' tactile discrimination responses were more strongly affected by visual stimuli presented on the right side when they held a single tool on the right, compared to visual stimuli presented on the left. When the use and/or manipulation of two tools were held, one in each hand, this spatial effect disappeared. Our results are incompatible with the hypothesis that tool-use extends peripersonal space, and suggest instead that tools results in an automatic multisensory shift of spatial attention to the side of space where the tip of the tool is actively held. These results have implications for many of the cognitive neuroscientific studies of tool-use published to date.

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70471-4

U2 - 10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70471-4

DO - 10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70471-4

M3 - Article

VL - 43

SP - 469

EP - 489

JO - Cortex

JF - Cortex

SN - 0010-9452

IS - 3

ER -