Abstract
IMPORTANCE Toddler screen time has been associated with poorer sleep and differences in attention. Understanding the causal impact of screen time on early development is of the highest importance. OBJECTIVE To test (1) the feasibility of the 7-week parent-administered screen time intervention (PASTI) in toddlers (aged 16-30 months) who have screen time in the hour before bed and (2) the impact of PASTI on toddlers’ sleep and attention. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This assessor-blinded, UK-based randomized clinical trial was conducted between July 2022 and July 2023. This was a single-site study that enrolled families with a toddler aged between 16 and 30 months, living within 75 miles of the Babylab, and with 10 minutes or more of screen time in the hour before bed on 3 or more days a week. Exclusion criteria were (1) a genetic or neurological condition, (2) premature birth (<37 weeks), and (3) current participation in another study. INTERVENTIONS Families were randomized (1:1:1) to (1) PASTI: caregivers removed toddler screen time in the hour before bed and used activities from a bedtime box instead (eg, reading, puzzles); (2) bedtime box (BB only): used matched before-bed activities, with no mention of screen time; or (3) no intervention (NI): continued as usual. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Feasibility outcomes: participation rate, intervention adherence, retention, family experiences, and assessment acceptability. Efficacy outcomes: screen use, actigraphy-measured sleep, and eye-tracking attention measures. RESULTS A total of 427 families were screened, 164 were eligible (38.4%), and 105 families were randomized (mean [SD] age, 23.7 [4.6] months; 60 male [57%]). The trial was feasible, with 99% participant (104 of 105) retention and 94% of families (33 of 35) adhering to PASTI. PASTI showed reductions in parent-reported screen time (vs NI: Cohen d = −0.96; 95% CI, −1.32 to −0.60; vs BB only: Cohen d = −0.65; 95% CI, −1.03 to −0.27). PASTI showed small to medium improvements in objectively measured sleep efficiency (vs NI: Cohen d = 0.27; 95% CI, −0.11 to 0.66; vs BB only: Cohen d = 0.56; 95% CI, 0.17-0.96), night awakenings (vs NI: Cohen d= −0.28; 95% CI, −0.67 to 0.12; vs BB only: Cohen d = −0.31; 95% CI, −0.71 to 0.10), and reduced daytime sleep (vs NI: Cohen d= −0.30; 95% CI, −0.74 to 0.13) but no difference compared with BB only. There was no observable effect of PASTI on objective measures of attention. Compared with BB only, PASTI showed a difference on parent-reported effortful control (Cohen d = −0.40; 95% CI, −0.75 to −0.05) and inhibitory control (Cohen d = −0.48; 95% CI, −0.77 to −0.19), due to an increase in BB-only scores. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Results of this randomized clinical trial show that, supporting pediatric recommendations, removing screen time before toddler bedtime was feasible and showed modest preliminary beneficial effects on sleep. A future full confirmatory trial is needed before PASTI’s adoption by parents and pediatricians.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1270-1279 |
Number of pages | 10 |
Journal | JAMA Pediatrics |
Volume | 178 |
Issue number | 12 |
Early online date | 21 Oct 2024 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2 Dec 2024 |
Data Availability Statement
Data available: YesData types: Participant data with identifiers,
Data dictionary
How to access data: https://researchdata.bbk.ac.uk/
When available: With publication
Supporting Documents
Document types: Informed consent form
How to access documents: https://osf.io/vnt6k/view_only=144a15ce466a4836a81983476b8d9fa0
When available: With publication
Additional Information
Who can access the data: Anyone requesting the data
Types of analyses: For any purpose
Mechanisms of data availability: Without investigator support
Acknowledgements
We thank our advisory board, Early Years Stakeholder Partners, and parents for their contributions and insights during the cocreation of our PASTI materials; we thank Jemima Cowley, BSc (University of Bath), Zoe Howell, BSc (Birkbeck), and Qiaoyu Zhou, BSc (University College London), who helped with recruitment. Beyond usual salary, volunteers and advisory board members did not receive extra financial compensation for their contributions. We also want to say a huge thank you to the families and children who took part in our study.Funding
Drs Pickard, Bedford, and Smith were supported by the Nuffield Foundation (FR-000022056) and Dr Essex was supported by an ESRC PhD Studentship(ES/P000592/1).This study represents independent research part funded by the NIHR Maudsley Biomedical Research Centre at South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and King’s College London (Drs Chu and Carter).
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health