Timely evaluation in international development

Jayne Webster, Josephine Exley, James Copestake, Rick Davies, James Hargreaves

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Impact and process evaluations are increasingly used in international development; however they are generally retrospective in outlook. A more timely approach to evaluation aims to identify necessary, feasible and effective changes during a programme or intervention’s lifetime. This paper aims to identify, categorise, describe and critically appraise methods to support more timely evaluation in international development. Potential methods were identified through scoping seminar, public symposium, targeted review of the literature, and the authors’ own experiences and opinions.
Findings from the different data sources were reviewed collectively by the author group and triangulated to develop an analytical framework. We identified four purposes of timely evaluation for international development, and critiqued the use of approaches against four dimensions of timeliness and flexibility. Whilst we found significant interest in more timely
approaches to evaluation in international development, there was a dearth of published empirical evidence upon which to base strong recommendations. There is significant potential for timely evaluation to improve international development outcomes. New approaches to mixing and adapting existing methods, together with new technologies offer increased potential. Research is needed to provide an empirical evidence base upon which to further develop the application, across sectors and
contexts, of timely evaluation in international development.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)482-508
Number of pages27
JournalJournal of Development Effectiveness
Volume10
Issue number4
Early online date27 Nov 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018

Keywords

  • Outcome evaluation
  • adaptive learning
  • impact evaluation
  • programme improvement

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Development

Cite this

Timely evaluation in international development. / Webster, Jayne; Exley, Josephine; Copestake, James; Davies, Rick; Hargreaves, James.

In: Journal of Development Effectiveness, Vol. 10, No. 4, 2018, p. 482-508.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Webster, Jayne ; Exley, Josephine ; Copestake, James ; Davies, Rick ; Hargreaves, James. / Timely evaluation in international development. In: Journal of Development Effectiveness. 2018 ; Vol. 10, No. 4. pp. 482-508.
@article{d14dbee33d6e44c7b309d6df7afbafc9,
title = "Timely evaluation in international development",
abstract = "Impact and process evaluations are increasingly used in international development; however they are generally retrospective in outlook. A more timely approach to evaluation aims to identify necessary, feasible and effective changes during a programme or intervention’s lifetime. This paper aims to identify, categorise, describe and critically appraise methods to support more timely evaluation in international development. Potential methods were identified through scoping seminar, public symposium, targeted review of the literature, and the authors’ own experiences and opinions.Findings from the different data sources were reviewed collectively by the author group and triangulated to develop an analytical framework. We identified four purposes of timely evaluation for international development, and critiqued the use of approaches against four dimensions of timeliness and flexibility. Whilst we found significant interest in more timelyapproaches to evaluation in international development, there was a dearth of published empirical evidence upon which to base strong recommendations. There is significant potential for timely evaluation to improve international development outcomes. New approaches to mixing and adapting existing methods, together with new technologies offer increased potential. Research is needed to provide an empirical evidence base upon which to further develop the application, across sectors andcontexts, of timely evaluation in international development.",
keywords = "Outcome evaluation, adaptive learning, impact evaluation, programme improvement",
author = "Jayne Webster and Josephine Exley and James Copestake and Rick Davies and James Hargreaves",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.1080/19439342.2018.1543345",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
pages = "482--508",
journal = "Journal of Development Effectiveness",
issn = "1943-9342",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Timely evaluation in international development

AU - Webster, Jayne

AU - Exley, Josephine

AU - Copestake, James

AU - Davies, Rick

AU - Hargreaves, James

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - Impact and process evaluations are increasingly used in international development; however they are generally retrospective in outlook. A more timely approach to evaluation aims to identify necessary, feasible and effective changes during a programme or intervention’s lifetime. This paper aims to identify, categorise, describe and critically appraise methods to support more timely evaluation in international development. Potential methods were identified through scoping seminar, public symposium, targeted review of the literature, and the authors’ own experiences and opinions.Findings from the different data sources were reviewed collectively by the author group and triangulated to develop an analytical framework. We identified four purposes of timely evaluation for international development, and critiqued the use of approaches against four dimensions of timeliness and flexibility. Whilst we found significant interest in more timelyapproaches to evaluation in international development, there was a dearth of published empirical evidence upon which to base strong recommendations. There is significant potential for timely evaluation to improve international development outcomes. New approaches to mixing and adapting existing methods, together with new technologies offer increased potential. Research is needed to provide an empirical evidence base upon which to further develop the application, across sectors andcontexts, of timely evaluation in international development.

AB - Impact and process evaluations are increasingly used in international development; however they are generally retrospective in outlook. A more timely approach to evaluation aims to identify necessary, feasible and effective changes during a programme or intervention’s lifetime. This paper aims to identify, categorise, describe and critically appraise methods to support more timely evaluation in international development. Potential methods were identified through scoping seminar, public symposium, targeted review of the literature, and the authors’ own experiences and opinions.Findings from the different data sources were reviewed collectively by the author group and triangulated to develop an analytical framework. We identified four purposes of timely evaluation for international development, and critiqued the use of approaches against four dimensions of timeliness and flexibility. Whilst we found significant interest in more timelyapproaches to evaluation in international development, there was a dearth of published empirical evidence upon which to base strong recommendations. There is significant potential for timely evaluation to improve international development outcomes. New approaches to mixing and adapting existing methods, together with new technologies offer increased potential. Research is needed to provide an empirical evidence base upon which to further develop the application, across sectors andcontexts, of timely evaluation in international development.

KW - Outcome evaluation

KW - adaptive learning

KW - impact evaluation

KW - programme improvement

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85057953943&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/19439342.2018.1543345

DO - 10.1080/19439342.2018.1543345

M3 - Article

VL - 10

SP - 482

EP - 508

JO - Journal of Development Effectiveness

JF - Journal of Development Effectiveness

SN - 1943-9342

IS - 4

ER -