Thinking race, thinking development

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

72 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper challenges the dominant 'colour-blind' stance of development, arguing that the silence on race is a determining silence, which both masks and marks its centrality to the development project. The aim of the paper is to set out a basic framework for exploring this further. Noting many continuities with colonial formations, it identifies three critical dimensions of development which need to be interrogated: its material outcomes; its techniques of transformation; and its modes of knowing. Its analysis of race emphasises the diversity of understandings and the fluidity between them which underlie both their potential for transformation and their resilience. Following Omi and Winant's work on the USA, development is suggested to comprise a process of racial formation, made up of a vast range of diverse and contradictory racial projects which link the meaning of ethnic, racial and national identities to material entitlements.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)407-419
Number of pages13
JournalThird World Quarterly
Volume23
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2002

Fingerprint

racial identity
need development
national identity
development project
resilience
continuity
material
analysis
project

Cite this

Thinking race, thinking development. / White, S.

In: Third World Quarterly, Vol. 23, No. 3, 2002, p. 407-419.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

White, S. / Thinking race, thinking development. In: Third World Quarterly. 2002 ; Vol. 23, No. 3. pp. 407-419.
@article{dc0c0c12042e431584b4cedf835af4a2,
title = "Thinking race, thinking development",
abstract = "This paper challenges the dominant 'colour-blind' stance of development, arguing that the silence on race is a determining silence, which both masks and marks its centrality to the development project. The aim of the paper is to set out a basic framework for exploring this further. Noting many continuities with colonial formations, it identifies three critical dimensions of development which need to be interrogated: its material outcomes; its techniques of transformation; and its modes of knowing. Its analysis of race emphasises the diversity of understandings and the fluidity between them which underlie both their potential for transformation and their resilience. Following Omi and Winant's work on the USA, development is suggested to comprise a process of racial formation, made up of a vast range of diverse and contradictory racial projects which link the meaning of ethnic, racial and national identities to material entitlements.",
author = "S White",
note = "ID number: ISI:000176343300001",
year = "2002",
doi = "10.1080/01436590220138358",
language = "English",
volume = "23",
pages = "407--419",
journal = "Third World Quarterly",
issn = "0143-6597",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Thinking race, thinking development

AU - White, S

N1 - ID number: ISI:000176343300001

PY - 2002

Y1 - 2002

N2 - This paper challenges the dominant 'colour-blind' stance of development, arguing that the silence on race is a determining silence, which both masks and marks its centrality to the development project. The aim of the paper is to set out a basic framework for exploring this further. Noting many continuities with colonial formations, it identifies three critical dimensions of development which need to be interrogated: its material outcomes; its techniques of transformation; and its modes of knowing. Its analysis of race emphasises the diversity of understandings and the fluidity between them which underlie both their potential for transformation and their resilience. Following Omi and Winant's work on the USA, development is suggested to comprise a process of racial formation, made up of a vast range of diverse and contradictory racial projects which link the meaning of ethnic, racial and national identities to material entitlements.

AB - This paper challenges the dominant 'colour-blind' stance of development, arguing that the silence on race is a determining silence, which both masks and marks its centrality to the development project. The aim of the paper is to set out a basic framework for exploring this further. Noting many continuities with colonial formations, it identifies three critical dimensions of development which need to be interrogated: its material outcomes; its techniques of transformation; and its modes of knowing. Its analysis of race emphasises the diversity of understandings and the fluidity between them which underlie both their potential for transformation and their resilience. Following Omi and Winant's work on the USA, development is suggested to comprise a process of racial formation, made up of a vast range of diverse and contradictory racial projects which link the meaning of ethnic, racial and national identities to material entitlements.

U2 - 10.1080/01436590220138358

DO - 10.1080/01436590220138358

M3 - Article

VL - 23

SP - 407

EP - 419

JO - Third World Quarterly

JF - Third World Quarterly

SN - 0143-6597

IS - 3

ER -