Abstract
Less than 5% of polystyrene is recycled, motivating a search for energy efficient and economical methods for polystyrene recycling that can be deployed at scale. One option is chemical recycling, consisting of thermal depolymerization and purification to produce monomer-grade styrene (>99%) and other co-products. Thermal depolymerization and distillation are readily scalable, well-established technologies; however, to be considered practical, they must be thermodynamically efficient, economically feasible, and environmentally responsible. Accordingly, mass and energy balances of a pyrolysis reactor for thermal depolymerization and two distillation columns to separate styrene from α-methyl styrene, styrene dimer, toluene, and ethyl benzene co-products, were simulated using ASPEN to evaluate thermodynamic and economic feasibility. These simulations indicate that monomer-grade styrene can be recovered with energy inputs <10MJ/kg, comparable to the energy content of pyrolysis co-products. Thermodynamic sensitivity analysis indicates the scope to reduce these values and enhance the robustness of the predictions. A probabilistic economic analysis of multiple scenarios combined with detailed sensitivity analysis indicates that the cost for recycled styrene is approximately twice the historical market value of fossil-derived styrene when styrene costs are fixed at 15% of the total product cost or less than the historical value when feedstock costs are assumed to be zero. A Monte Carlo and Net Present Value-based economic performance analysis indicates that chemical recycling is economically viable for scenarios assuming realistic feedstock costs. Furthermore, the CO 2 abatement cost is roughly $1.5 per ton of averted CO 2, relative to a pyrolysis process system to produce fuels. As much as 60% of all polystyrene used today could be replaced by chemically recycled styrene, thus quantifying the potential benefits of this readily scalable approach.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | 152079 |
Number of pages | 14 |
Journal | Chemical Engineering Journal |
Volume | 492 |
Early online date | 9 May 2024 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 15 Jul 2024 |
Data Availability Statement
No data was used for the research described in the article.Funding
ERB's contribution to this study was funded in part by the U.S. National Science Foundation (#2038257). MTT and MRR's contributions were supported by a graduate training grant provided by the U.S. National Science Foundation (NRT-HDR: Data-Driven Sustainable Engineering for a Circular Economy, #2021871) ERB\u2019s contribution to this study was funded in part by the U.S. National Science Foundation (# 2038257 ). MTT and MRR\u2019s contributions were supported by a graduate training grant provided by the U.S. National Science Foundation ( NRT -HDR: Data-Driven Sustainable Engineering for a Circular Economy, # 2021871 )
Funders | Funder number |
---|---|
NRT-HDR | |
National Science Foundation | 2038257 |
National Science Foundation | |
New Relationship Trust | 2021871 |
New Relationship Trust |
Keywords
- Chemical recycling
- Polystyrene
- Process design
- Pyrolysis
- Thermodynamic analysis
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- General Chemical Engineering
- General Chemistry
- Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
- Environmental Chemistry