The use of new economic decision support tools for adaptation assessment: a review of methods and applications, towards guidance on applicability

Paul Watkiss, Alistair Hunt, William Blyth, Jillian Dyszynski

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article

35 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

There is a growing focus on the economics of adaptation as policy moves from theory to practice. However, the techniques commonly used in economic appraisal have limitations in coping with climate change uncertainty. While decision making under uncertainty has gained prominence, economic appraisal of adaptation still uses approaches such as deterministic cost-benefit analysis. Against this background, this paper provides a critical review and assessment of existing economic decision support tools (cost-benefit analysis and cost-effectiveness analysis) an uncertainty framework (iterative risk management) and alternative tools that more fully incorporate uncertainty (real options analysis, robust decision making and portfolio analysis). The paper summarises each method, provides examples, and assesses their strengths and weaknesses for adaptation. The tools are then compared to identify key differences, and to identify when these approaches might be appropriate for specific applications in adaptation decision making.
LanguageEnglish
Pages401-416
Number of pages16
JournalClimatic Change
Volume132
Issue number3
Early online date7 Oct 2014
DOIs
StatusPublished - Oct 2015

Fingerprint

decision making
cost-benefit analysis
economics
cost analysis
climate change
decision
method
analysis
appraisal
risk management
policy

Cite this

The use of new economic decision support tools for adaptation assessment : a review of methods and applications, towards guidance on applicability. / Watkiss, Paul; Hunt, Alistair; Blyth, William; Dyszynski, Jillian.

In: Climatic Change, Vol. 132, No. 3, 10.2015, p. 401-416.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article

Watkiss, P, Hunt, A, Blyth, W & Dyszynski, J 2015, 'The use of new economic decision support tools for adaptation assessment: a review of methods and applications, towards guidance on applicability', Climatic Change, vol. 132, no. 3, pp. 401-416. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-014-1250-9
Watkiss P, Hunt A, Blyth W, Dyszynski J. The use of new economic decision support tools for adaptation assessment: a review of methods and applications, towards guidance on applicability. Climatic Change. 2015 Oct;132(3):401-416. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-014-1250-9
Watkiss, Paul ; Hunt, Alistair ; Blyth, William ; Dyszynski, Jillian. / The use of new economic decision support tools for adaptation assessment : a review of methods and applications, towards guidance on applicability. In: Climatic Change. 2015 ; Vol. 132, No. 3. pp. 401-416.
@article{58b14882d44542149d406e19f4e6fe9c,
title = "The use of new economic decision support tools for adaptation assessment: a review of methods and applications, towards guidance on applicability",
abstract = "There is a growing focus on the economics of adaptation as policy moves from theory to practice. However, the techniques commonly used in economic appraisal have limitations in coping with climate change uncertainty. While decision making under uncertainty has gained prominence, economic appraisal of adaptation still uses approaches such as deterministic cost-benefit analysis. Against this background, this paper provides a critical review and assessment of existing economic decision support tools (cost-benefit analysis and cost-effectiveness analysis) an uncertainty framework (iterative risk management) and alternative tools that more fully incorporate uncertainty (real options analysis, robust decision making and portfolio analysis). The paper summarises each method, provides examples, and assesses their strengths and weaknesses for adaptation. The tools are then compared to identify key differences, and to identify when these approaches might be appropriate for specific applications in adaptation decision making.",
author = "Paul Watkiss and Alistair Hunt and William Blyth and Jillian Dyszynski",
year = "2015",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1007/s10584-014-1250-9",
language = "English",
volume = "132",
pages = "401--416",
journal = "Climatic Change",
issn = "0165-0009",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The use of new economic decision support tools for adaptation assessment

T2 - Climatic Change

AU - Watkiss, Paul

AU - Hunt, Alistair

AU - Blyth, William

AU - Dyszynski, Jillian

PY - 2015/10

Y1 - 2015/10

N2 - There is a growing focus on the economics of adaptation as policy moves from theory to practice. However, the techniques commonly used in economic appraisal have limitations in coping with climate change uncertainty. While decision making under uncertainty has gained prominence, economic appraisal of adaptation still uses approaches such as deterministic cost-benefit analysis. Against this background, this paper provides a critical review and assessment of existing economic decision support tools (cost-benefit analysis and cost-effectiveness analysis) an uncertainty framework (iterative risk management) and alternative tools that more fully incorporate uncertainty (real options analysis, robust decision making and portfolio analysis). The paper summarises each method, provides examples, and assesses their strengths and weaknesses for adaptation. The tools are then compared to identify key differences, and to identify when these approaches might be appropriate for specific applications in adaptation decision making.

AB - There is a growing focus on the economics of adaptation as policy moves from theory to practice. However, the techniques commonly used in economic appraisal have limitations in coping with climate change uncertainty. While decision making under uncertainty has gained prominence, economic appraisal of adaptation still uses approaches such as deterministic cost-benefit analysis. Against this background, this paper provides a critical review and assessment of existing economic decision support tools (cost-benefit analysis and cost-effectiveness analysis) an uncertainty framework (iterative risk management) and alternative tools that more fully incorporate uncertainty (real options analysis, robust decision making and portfolio analysis). The paper summarises each method, provides examples, and assesses their strengths and weaknesses for adaptation. The tools are then compared to identify key differences, and to identify when these approaches might be appropriate for specific applications in adaptation decision making.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84907651969&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10584-014-1250-9

U2 - 10.1007/s10584-014-1250-9

DO - 10.1007/s10584-014-1250-9

M3 - Article

VL - 132

SP - 401

EP - 416

JO - Climatic Change

JF - Climatic Change

SN - 0165-0009

IS - 3

ER -

Access to Document