The Use of Mental Health Law By Relatives of Patients with Mental Health Problems: The Case of the Nearest Relative

Jeremy Dixon, Kevin Stone

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaper

Abstract

The concept of ‘family burden’ has been used by sociologists to explore the emotional strains and economic difficulties experienced by the families of psychiatric patients. Through drawing on published research, this paper considers the way in which subjective burdens experienced by families might impact on decisions relating to the compulsory admission of patients who have been diagnosed as being mentally unwell.

The paper focusses specifically on the role of the Nearest Relative under the Mental Health Act 1983 in England and Wales. Nearest Relatives are given powers to prevent an admission in hospital for treatment or to request an independent review of detention. Conversely, they are also empowered to apply for detention or to request that professionals consider this.

The paper highlights a number of tensions related to the Nearest Relative role. First, quantitative research has shown that family members view admission more positively than the users of mental health services. Second, studies have shown that patients and carers hold different perspectives on the degree to which compulsory admission may be justified. Third, users of mental health services may view the actions of Nearest Relatives as detrimental to their recovery. We conclude by considering ways in which the current system may be improved.
Original languageEnglish
Publication statusUnpublished - 2018
EventXIX International Sociological Association World Congress of Sociology: Power, Violence and Justice: Reflections, Responses and Responsibilities - The Metro Toronto Convention Centre , Toronto, Canada
Duration: 15 Jul 201821 Jul 2018
https://www.isa-sociology.org/en/conferences/world-congress/toronto-2018/

Conference

ConferenceXIX International Sociological Association World Congress of Sociology
CountryCanada
CityToronto
Period15/07/1821/07/18
Internet address

Fingerprint

health law
mental health
health service
quantitative research
sociologist
family member
act
economics

Cite this

Dixon, J., & Stone, K. (2018). The Use of Mental Health Law By Relatives of Patients with Mental Health Problems: The Case of the Nearest Relative. Paper presented at XIX International Sociological Association World Congress of Sociology, Toronto, Canada.

The Use of Mental Health Law By Relatives of Patients with Mental Health Problems: The Case of the Nearest Relative. / Dixon, Jeremy; Stone, Kevin.

2018. Paper presented at XIX International Sociological Association World Congress of Sociology, Toronto, Canada.

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaper

Dixon, J & Stone, K 2018, 'The Use of Mental Health Law By Relatives of Patients with Mental Health Problems: The Case of the Nearest Relative', Paper presented at XIX International Sociological Association World Congress of Sociology, Toronto, Canada, 15/07/18 - 21/07/18.
Dixon J, Stone K. The Use of Mental Health Law By Relatives of Patients with Mental Health Problems: The Case of the Nearest Relative. 2018. Paper presented at XIX International Sociological Association World Congress of Sociology, Toronto, Canada.
Dixon, Jeremy ; Stone, Kevin. / The Use of Mental Health Law By Relatives of Patients with Mental Health Problems: The Case of the Nearest Relative. Paper presented at XIX International Sociological Association World Congress of Sociology, Toronto, Canada.
@conference{69ceeb18231d4220875efb83fc4f7e19,
title = "The Use of Mental Health Law By Relatives of Patients with Mental Health Problems: The Case of the Nearest Relative",
abstract = "The concept of ‘family burden’ has been used by sociologists to explore the emotional strains and economic difficulties experienced by the families of psychiatric patients. Through drawing on published research, this paper considers the way in which subjective burdens experienced by families might impact on decisions relating to the compulsory admission of patients who have been diagnosed as being mentally unwell. The paper focusses specifically on the role of the Nearest Relative under the Mental Health Act 1983 in England and Wales. Nearest Relatives are given powers to prevent an admission in hospital for treatment or to request an independent review of detention. Conversely, they are also empowered to apply for detention or to request that professionals consider this. The paper highlights a number of tensions related to the Nearest Relative role. First, quantitative research has shown that family members view admission more positively than the users of mental health services. Second, studies have shown that patients and carers hold different perspectives on the degree to which compulsory admission may be justified. Third, users of mental health services may view the actions of Nearest Relatives as detrimental to their recovery. We conclude by considering ways in which the current system may be improved.",
author = "Jeremy Dixon and Kevin Stone",
year = "2018",
language = "English",
note = "XIX International Sociological Association World Congress of Sociology : Power, Violence and Justice: Reflections, Responses and Responsibilities ; Conference date: 15-07-2018 Through 21-07-2018",
url = "https://www.isa-sociology.org/en/conferences/world-congress/toronto-2018/",

}

TY - CONF

T1 - The Use of Mental Health Law By Relatives of Patients with Mental Health Problems: The Case of the Nearest Relative

AU - Dixon, Jeremy

AU - Stone, Kevin

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - The concept of ‘family burden’ has been used by sociologists to explore the emotional strains and economic difficulties experienced by the families of psychiatric patients. Through drawing on published research, this paper considers the way in which subjective burdens experienced by families might impact on decisions relating to the compulsory admission of patients who have been diagnosed as being mentally unwell. The paper focusses specifically on the role of the Nearest Relative under the Mental Health Act 1983 in England and Wales. Nearest Relatives are given powers to prevent an admission in hospital for treatment or to request an independent review of detention. Conversely, they are also empowered to apply for detention or to request that professionals consider this. The paper highlights a number of tensions related to the Nearest Relative role. First, quantitative research has shown that family members view admission more positively than the users of mental health services. Second, studies have shown that patients and carers hold different perspectives on the degree to which compulsory admission may be justified. Third, users of mental health services may view the actions of Nearest Relatives as detrimental to their recovery. We conclude by considering ways in which the current system may be improved.

AB - The concept of ‘family burden’ has been used by sociologists to explore the emotional strains and economic difficulties experienced by the families of psychiatric patients. Through drawing on published research, this paper considers the way in which subjective burdens experienced by families might impact on decisions relating to the compulsory admission of patients who have been diagnosed as being mentally unwell. The paper focusses specifically on the role of the Nearest Relative under the Mental Health Act 1983 in England and Wales. Nearest Relatives are given powers to prevent an admission in hospital for treatment or to request an independent review of detention. Conversely, they are also empowered to apply for detention or to request that professionals consider this. The paper highlights a number of tensions related to the Nearest Relative role. First, quantitative research has shown that family members view admission more positively than the users of mental health services. Second, studies have shown that patients and carers hold different perspectives on the degree to which compulsory admission may be justified. Third, users of mental health services may view the actions of Nearest Relatives as detrimental to their recovery. We conclude by considering ways in which the current system may be improved.

UR - https://isaconf.confex.com/isaconf/wc2018/webprogram/Paper96017.html

M3 - Paper

ER -