The use of ionosondes in GPS ionospheric tomography at low latitudes

Alex T. Chartier, Nathan D. Smith, Cathryn N. Mitchell, David R. Jackson, Percy J. C. Patilongo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A new technique is presented for the incorporation of ionosonde observations into GPS ionospheric tomography. This approach greatly improves the vertical resolution of the images when using independent incoherent scatter radar observations as ground truth, addressing a traditional weakness of tomographic techniques. Ionosonde observations are used to set vertical basis functions adaptively within the inversion as well as providing electron density information for direct assimilation. The technique also improves slant total electron content (TEC) accuracy in the vicinity of the ionosonde. An experiment was performed in the equatorial region of South America as a 6-day case study due to the availability of incoherent scatter and ionosonde data during this period. Preliminary results were validated with the Jicamarca incoherent scatter radar and independent GPS slant TEC observations. Using the incoherent scatter radar as ground truth for the vertical profile, the new technique reduces mean NmF2 error to -0.07 × 10 11 electrons/m 3 compared with 0.27 × 10 11 electrons/m 3 in a control run with no ionosonde data, while root-mean square error is now 0.5 × 10 11 electrons/m 3 compared with 1.0 × 10 11 electrons/m 3 in the control. The new technique also results in 0.1 km mean error in hmF2, compared with -3.9 km in the control, while root-mean square hmF2 error is around 40 km in both cases. Using independent slant TEC observations, the mean error is -0.36 TECU compared with 0.64 TECU in the control run, while root-mean square error is 3.55 TECU down from 4.02 TECU, suggesting the new technique also improves TEC values.
Original languageEnglish
Article numberA10326
JournalJournal of Geophysical Research
Volume117
Issue numberA10
Early online date24 Oct 2012
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2012

Fingerprint

ionosondes
tomography
tropical regions
ionospherics
Tomography
Global positioning system
GPS
electrons
electron
Electrons
radar
incoherent scatter radar
root-mean-square errors
Mean square error
Radar
ground truth
slopes
vertical profile
electron density
methodology

Cite this

The use of ionosondes in GPS ionospheric tomography at low latitudes. / Chartier, Alex T.; Smith, Nathan D.; Mitchell, Cathryn N.; Jackson, David R.; Patilongo, Percy J. C.

In: Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 117, No. A10, A10326, 10.2012.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Chartier, Alex T. ; Smith, Nathan D. ; Mitchell, Cathryn N. ; Jackson, David R. ; Patilongo, Percy J. C. / The use of ionosondes in GPS ionospheric tomography at low latitudes. In: Journal of Geophysical Research. 2012 ; Vol. 117, No. A10.
@article{4d10e01b29ed449c85fc84c1b36eab73,
title = "The use of ionosondes in GPS ionospheric tomography at low latitudes",
abstract = "A new technique is presented for the incorporation of ionosonde observations into GPS ionospheric tomography. This approach greatly improves the vertical resolution of the images when using independent incoherent scatter radar observations as ground truth, addressing a traditional weakness of tomographic techniques. Ionosonde observations are used to set vertical basis functions adaptively within the inversion as well as providing electron density information for direct assimilation. The technique also improves slant total electron content (TEC) accuracy in the vicinity of the ionosonde. An experiment was performed in the equatorial region of South America as a 6-day case study due to the availability of incoherent scatter and ionosonde data during this period. Preliminary results were validated with the Jicamarca incoherent scatter radar and independent GPS slant TEC observations. Using the incoherent scatter radar as ground truth for the vertical profile, the new technique reduces mean NmF2 error to -0.07 × 10 11 electrons/m 3 compared with 0.27 × 10 11 electrons/m 3 in a control run with no ionosonde data, while root-mean square error is now 0.5 × 10 11 electrons/m 3 compared with 1.0 × 10 11 electrons/m 3 in the control. The new technique also results in 0.1 km mean error in hmF2, compared with -3.9 km in the control, while root-mean square hmF2 error is around 40 km in both cases. Using independent slant TEC observations, the mean error is -0.36 TECU compared with 0.64 TECU in the control run, while root-mean square error is 3.55 TECU down from 4.02 TECU, suggesting the new technique also improves TEC values.",
author = "Chartier, {Alex T.} and Smith, {Nathan D.} and Mitchell, {Cathryn N.} and Jackson, {David R.} and Patilongo, {Percy J. C.}",
year = "2012",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1029/2012JA018054",
language = "English",
volume = "117",
journal = "Journal of Geophysical Research",
issn = "0148-0227",
publisher = "American Geophysical Union",
number = "A10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The use of ionosondes in GPS ionospheric tomography at low latitudes

AU - Chartier, Alex T.

AU - Smith, Nathan D.

AU - Mitchell, Cathryn N.

AU - Jackson, David R.

AU - Patilongo, Percy J. C.

PY - 2012/10

Y1 - 2012/10

N2 - A new technique is presented for the incorporation of ionosonde observations into GPS ionospheric tomography. This approach greatly improves the vertical resolution of the images when using independent incoherent scatter radar observations as ground truth, addressing a traditional weakness of tomographic techniques. Ionosonde observations are used to set vertical basis functions adaptively within the inversion as well as providing electron density information for direct assimilation. The technique also improves slant total electron content (TEC) accuracy in the vicinity of the ionosonde. An experiment was performed in the equatorial region of South America as a 6-day case study due to the availability of incoherent scatter and ionosonde data during this period. Preliminary results were validated with the Jicamarca incoherent scatter radar and independent GPS slant TEC observations. Using the incoherent scatter radar as ground truth for the vertical profile, the new technique reduces mean NmF2 error to -0.07 × 10 11 electrons/m 3 compared with 0.27 × 10 11 electrons/m 3 in a control run with no ionosonde data, while root-mean square error is now 0.5 × 10 11 electrons/m 3 compared with 1.0 × 10 11 electrons/m 3 in the control. The new technique also results in 0.1 km mean error in hmF2, compared with -3.9 km in the control, while root-mean square hmF2 error is around 40 km in both cases. Using independent slant TEC observations, the mean error is -0.36 TECU compared with 0.64 TECU in the control run, while root-mean square error is 3.55 TECU down from 4.02 TECU, suggesting the new technique also improves TEC values.

AB - A new technique is presented for the incorporation of ionosonde observations into GPS ionospheric tomography. This approach greatly improves the vertical resolution of the images when using independent incoherent scatter radar observations as ground truth, addressing a traditional weakness of tomographic techniques. Ionosonde observations are used to set vertical basis functions adaptively within the inversion as well as providing electron density information for direct assimilation. The technique also improves slant total electron content (TEC) accuracy in the vicinity of the ionosonde. An experiment was performed in the equatorial region of South America as a 6-day case study due to the availability of incoherent scatter and ionosonde data during this period. Preliminary results were validated with the Jicamarca incoherent scatter radar and independent GPS slant TEC observations. Using the incoherent scatter radar as ground truth for the vertical profile, the new technique reduces mean NmF2 error to -0.07 × 10 11 electrons/m 3 compared with 0.27 × 10 11 electrons/m 3 in a control run with no ionosonde data, while root-mean square error is now 0.5 × 10 11 electrons/m 3 compared with 1.0 × 10 11 electrons/m 3 in the control. The new technique also results in 0.1 km mean error in hmF2, compared with -3.9 km in the control, while root-mean square hmF2 error is around 40 km in both cases. Using independent slant TEC observations, the mean error is -0.36 TECU compared with 0.64 TECU in the control run, while root-mean square error is 3.55 TECU down from 4.02 TECU, suggesting the new technique also improves TEC values.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84868340029&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2012JA018054

U2 - 10.1029/2012JA018054

DO - 10.1029/2012JA018054

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84868340029

VL - 117

JO - Journal of Geophysical Research

JF - Journal of Geophysical Research

SN - 0148-0227

IS - A10

M1 - A10326

ER -