Abstract
Geographic information systems (GIS) are computer-based spatial mapping tools widely used in public health to examine service availability and access disparities and healthcare utilization. While GIS has supported evidence-based health planning in various domains, its application in mental healthcare service delivery remains underexplored. Our scoping review aimed to address this gap by exploring the scope and type of GIS usage in studying three dimensions of mental health (MH) service delivery (availability, accessibility and utilization), across all geographical locations, settings and populations. We conducted a scoping review following the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology. We included peer-reviewed English-language studies using GIS to examine service delivery (availability, accessibility or utilization) for any MH condition diagnosed through standardized criteria or validated tools. Seven databases were searched (Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online [MEDLINE], PsycINFO, Excerpta Medica Database [Embase], Global Health, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature [CINAHL], Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials [CENTRAL] and Web of Science) between January and April 2024. This review included 58 studies predominantly from high-income countries. A wide range of GIS methods were employed across studies, including hotspot analysis, network analysis and spatial analysis. Six studies explored availability, generally through measures like distribution of facilities across a population, and resource availability within 5–10-mile network buffers. Forty-six studies explored the spatial accessibility of MH services and substance-use treatment facilities using GIS. Six studies examined service utilization patterns. Equity emerged as a recurring theme across all three dimensions. GIS has the potential to emerge as a powerful tool in MH research, particularly in mapping disparities, informing service delivery and identifying high-risk zones. Expanding GIS use in trial design, implementation science and policy advocacy could help bridge critical gaps in MH service delivery, ensuring more equitable and data-driven decision-making.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | e132 |
| Number of pages | 17 |
| Journal | Cambridge Prisms: Global Mental Health |
| Volume | 12 |
| Early online date | 11 Nov 2025 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 11 Nov 2025 |
Data Availability Statement
Data availability is not applicable to this article as no new data were created or analyzed in this study.Funding
This study was a part of the IMPlementation of evidencebased facility and community interventions to reduce the treatment gap for depRESSion (IMPRESS) program that has been funded through a grant from the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH), United States (Grant Number R01MH115504). Competing interests.
Keywords
- digital technologies
- efficiency
- global mental health
- global mental health delivery
- health inequalities
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Health Policy
- Psychiatry and Mental health