Abstract
Using data on 73 economies for the years 2000 to 2003, this paper empirically analyzes the effects of labor regulation on unemployment around the globe. According to the regression results, stricter regulation generally appears to increase unemployment. Tight hiring and firing rules and military conscription most clearly seem to have adverse effects. More centralized collective bargaining seems to increase female unemployment. The size of most effects appears to be substantial, particularly among young people. However, we do not find statistically significant effects of minimum wages or unemployment benefits. Our results are robust to variations in specification
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 76-90 |
| Number of pages | 15 |
| Journal | Journal of Comparative Economics |
| Volume | 37 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| Early online date | 14 Oct 2008 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Mar 2009 |
Bibliographical note
Symposium: Labor Regulation In Developing CountriesUN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 5 Gender Equality -
SDG 8 Decent Work and Economic Growth
Keywords
- Collective bargaining
- Unemployment benefits
- Minimum wage
- Hiring and firing regulation
- Unemployment
- Military conscription
- Labor regulation
Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS