The systematic identification of content and delivery style of an exercise intervention

Fay E. Beck, Fiona B. Gillison, Miraslava D. Koseva, Martyn Standage, Jessica L. Brodrick, Claire Graham, Hollie Young

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)
88 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Objective: This study explored the utility of using behaviour change taxonomies and checklists to systematically assess the content and delivery of behavioural support for physical activity delivered through an established exercise-referral scheme.
Design: An observation study was conducted whereby 22% of initial consultations were observed and audio-recorded, using quota sampling stratified by exercise-referral advisor.
Main Outcome Measures: Content was independently coded by two researchers, to assess; i) completeness in delivering the programme protocol, ii) behaviour change techniques delivered (defined using the CALO-RE taxonomy), and iii) delivery style according to the Behaviour Change Counselling Index (BECCI).
Results: Protocol completeness was 63.6% (range 35.6%-74.6%). The behaviour change techniques delivered most consistently were ‘providing information about where and when to perform the behavior' (86%) and ‘setting outcome goals’ (82%). Other evidence-based techniques such as self-monitoring were infrequently observed. Variation in BECCI scores indicated that advisors could, but did not consistently, provide a client-centred service.
Conclusion: This study highlights how theoretically informed taxonomies can be useful in evaluating service delivery within applied practice, providing a meaningful way of assessing the completeness of protocol delivery relative to evidence. The provision of feedback to practitioners based on such objective criteria also facilitated positive academic-practitioner communication.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)605-621
JournalPsychology & Health
Volume31
Issue number5
Early online date20 Jan 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Fingerprint

Referral and Consultation
Counseling
Checklist
Communication
Research Personnel
Observation
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)

Cite this

The systematic identification of content and delivery style of an exercise intervention. / Beck, Fay E.; Gillison, Fiona B.; Koseva, Miraslava D.; Standage, Martyn; Brodrick, Jessica L.; Graham, Claire; Young, Hollie.

In: Psychology & Health, Vol. 31, No. 5, 2016, p. 605-621.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Beck, Fay E. ; Gillison, Fiona B. ; Koseva, Miraslava D. ; Standage, Martyn ; Brodrick, Jessica L. ; Graham, Claire ; Young, Hollie. / The systematic identification of content and delivery style of an exercise intervention. In: Psychology & Health. 2016 ; Vol. 31, No. 5. pp. 605-621.
@article{f5d3b576ef1f4943a646f09bf416ad02,
title = "The systematic identification of content and delivery style of an exercise intervention",
abstract = "Objective: This study explored the utility of using behaviour change taxonomies and checklists to systematically assess the content and delivery of behavioural support for physical activity delivered through an established exercise-referral scheme. Design: An observation study was conducted whereby 22{\%} of initial consultations were observed and audio-recorded, using quota sampling stratified by exercise-referral advisor.Main Outcome Measures: Content was independently coded by two researchers, to assess; i) completeness in delivering the programme protocol, ii) behaviour change techniques delivered (defined using the CALO-RE taxonomy), and iii) delivery style according to the Behaviour Change Counselling Index (BECCI).Results: Protocol completeness was 63.6{\%} (range 35.6{\%}-74.6{\%}). The behaviour change techniques delivered most consistently were ‘providing information about where and when to perform the behavior' (86{\%}) and ‘setting outcome goals’ (82{\%}). Other evidence-based techniques such as self-monitoring were infrequently observed. Variation in BECCI scores indicated that advisors could, but did not consistently, provide a client-centred service. Conclusion: This study highlights how theoretically informed taxonomies can be useful in evaluating service delivery within applied practice, providing a meaningful way of assessing the completeness of protocol delivery relative to evidence. The provision of feedback to practitioners based on such objective criteria also facilitated positive academic-practitioner communication.",
author = "Beck, {Fay E.} and Gillison, {Fiona B.} and Koseva, {Miraslava D.} and Martyn Standage and Brodrick, {Jessica L.} and Claire Graham and Hollie Young",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1080/08870446.2015.1132718",
language = "English",
volume = "31",
pages = "605--621",
journal = "Psychology & Health",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The systematic identification of content and delivery style of an exercise intervention

AU - Beck, Fay E.

AU - Gillison, Fiona B.

AU - Koseva, Miraslava D.

AU - Standage, Martyn

AU - Brodrick, Jessica L.

AU - Graham, Claire

AU - Young, Hollie

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - Objective: This study explored the utility of using behaviour change taxonomies and checklists to systematically assess the content and delivery of behavioural support for physical activity delivered through an established exercise-referral scheme. Design: An observation study was conducted whereby 22% of initial consultations were observed and audio-recorded, using quota sampling stratified by exercise-referral advisor.Main Outcome Measures: Content was independently coded by two researchers, to assess; i) completeness in delivering the programme protocol, ii) behaviour change techniques delivered (defined using the CALO-RE taxonomy), and iii) delivery style according to the Behaviour Change Counselling Index (BECCI).Results: Protocol completeness was 63.6% (range 35.6%-74.6%). The behaviour change techniques delivered most consistently were ‘providing information about where and when to perform the behavior' (86%) and ‘setting outcome goals’ (82%). Other evidence-based techniques such as self-monitoring were infrequently observed. Variation in BECCI scores indicated that advisors could, but did not consistently, provide a client-centred service. Conclusion: This study highlights how theoretically informed taxonomies can be useful in evaluating service delivery within applied practice, providing a meaningful way of assessing the completeness of protocol delivery relative to evidence. The provision of feedback to practitioners based on such objective criteria also facilitated positive academic-practitioner communication.

AB - Objective: This study explored the utility of using behaviour change taxonomies and checklists to systematically assess the content and delivery of behavioural support for physical activity delivered through an established exercise-referral scheme. Design: An observation study was conducted whereby 22% of initial consultations were observed and audio-recorded, using quota sampling stratified by exercise-referral advisor.Main Outcome Measures: Content was independently coded by two researchers, to assess; i) completeness in delivering the programme protocol, ii) behaviour change techniques delivered (defined using the CALO-RE taxonomy), and iii) delivery style according to the Behaviour Change Counselling Index (BECCI).Results: Protocol completeness was 63.6% (range 35.6%-74.6%). The behaviour change techniques delivered most consistently were ‘providing information about where and when to perform the behavior' (86%) and ‘setting outcome goals’ (82%). Other evidence-based techniques such as self-monitoring were infrequently observed. Variation in BECCI scores indicated that advisors could, but did not consistently, provide a client-centred service. Conclusion: This study highlights how theoretically informed taxonomies can be useful in evaluating service delivery within applied practice, providing a meaningful way of assessing the completeness of protocol delivery relative to evidence. The provision of feedback to practitioners based on such objective criteria also facilitated positive academic-practitioner communication.

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2015.1132718

U2 - 10.1080/08870446.2015.1132718

DO - 10.1080/08870446.2015.1132718

M3 - Article

VL - 31

SP - 605

EP - 621

JO - Psychology & Health

JF - Psychology & Health

IS - 5

ER -