El Estado de la Ciencia Política en México

Un Retrato Empírico

Translated title of the contribution: The State of Political Science in Mexico: An Empirical Portrait

Mauricio Rivera Celestino, Rodrigo Salazar-Elena

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

There are some scholars who believe that Mexican political science has followed the standard of American political science and the former has accumulated the same flaws of the later, whereas other scholars consider that the practice of the discipline is still far from the American standard but that should be its goal. The current discussion is dominated by personal impressions rather than by empirical evaluations on the actual state of the discipline. This paper analyzes a sample of 231 published articles in three leading political science journals between 1990 and 2007. Contrary to beliefs about the Americanization of Mexican political science, results show that the later is dominantly descriptive, monographic and qualitative. The main conclusion is that beyond debating the preeminence of any method in particular, the discipline in Mexico will contribute more to the extent that it starts debating substantive aspects of the research methods and processes.
Original languageSpanish
Pages (from-to)73-108
Number of pages36
JournalPolítica y Gobierno
Volume18
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 2011

Fingerprint

political science
Mexico
americanization
research process
research method
evaluation

Cite this

Rivera Celestino, M., & Salazar-Elena, R. (2011). El Estado de la Ciencia Política en México: Un Retrato Empírico . Política y Gobierno, 18(1), 73-108 .

El Estado de la Ciencia Política en México : Un Retrato Empírico . / Rivera Celestino, Mauricio; Salazar-Elena, Rodrigo .

In: Política y Gobierno, Vol. 18, No. 1, 2011, p. 73-108 .

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Rivera Celestino, M & Salazar-Elena, R 2011, 'El Estado de la Ciencia Política en México: Un Retrato Empírico ', Política y Gobierno, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 73-108 .
Rivera Celestino M, Salazar-Elena R. El Estado de la Ciencia Política en México: Un Retrato Empírico . Política y Gobierno. 2011;18(1):73-108 .
Rivera Celestino, Mauricio ; Salazar-Elena, Rodrigo . / El Estado de la Ciencia Política en México : Un Retrato Empírico . In: Política y Gobierno. 2011 ; Vol. 18, No. 1. pp. 73-108 .
@article{d4d2f627993e4dbbaae5b32b19169bb3,
title = "El Estado de la Ciencia Pol{\'i}tica en M{\'e}xico: Un Retrato Emp{\'i}rico",
abstract = "There are some scholars who believe that Mexican political science has followed the standard of American political science and the former has accumulated the same flaws of the later, whereas other scholars consider that the practice of the discipline is still far from the American standard but that should be its goal. The current discussion is dominated by personal impressions rather than by empirical evaluations on the actual state of the discipline. This paper analyzes a sample of 231 published articles in three leading political science journals between 1990 and 2007. Contrary to beliefs about the Americanization of Mexican political science, results show that the later is dominantly descriptive, monographic and qualitative. The main conclusion is that beyond debating the preeminence of any method in particular, the discipline in Mexico will contribute more to the extent that it starts debating substantive aspects of the research methods and processes.",
author = "{Rivera Celestino}, Mauricio and Rodrigo Salazar-Elena",
year = "2011",
language = "Spanish",
volume = "18",
pages = "73--108",
journal = "Pol{\'i}tica y Gobierno",
issn = "1665-2037",
publisher = "Centro de Investigacion y Docencia Economicas A.C.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - El Estado de la Ciencia Política en México

T2 - Un Retrato Empírico

AU - Rivera Celestino, Mauricio

AU - Salazar-Elena, Rodrigo

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - There are some scholars who believe that Mexican political science has followed the standard of American political science and the former has accumulated the same flaws of the later, whereas other scholars consider that the practice of the discipline is still far from the American standard but that should be its goal. The current discussion is dominated by personal impressions rather than by empirical evaluations on the actual state of the discipline. This paper analyzes a sample of 231 published articles in three leading political science journals between 1990 and 2007. Contrary to beliefs about the Americanization of Mexican political science, results show that the later is dominantly descriptive, monographic and qualitative. The main conclusion is that beyond debating the preeminence of any method in particular, the discipline in Mexico will contribute more to the extent that it starts debating substantive aspects of the research methods and processes.

AB - There are some scholars who believe that Mexican political science has followed the standard of American political science and the former has accumulated the same flaws of the later, whereas other scholars consider that the practice of the discipline is still far from the American standard but that should be its goal. The current discussion is dominated by personal impressions rather than by empirical evaluations on the actual state of the discipline. This paper analyzes a sample of 231 published articles in three leading political science journals between 1990 and 2007. Contrary to beliefs about the Americanization of Mexican political science, results show that the later is dominantly descriptive, monographic and qualitative. The main conclusion is that beyond debating the preeminence of any method in particular, the discipline in Mexico will contribute more to the extent that it starts debating substantive aspects of the research methods and processes.

M3 - Article

VL - 18

SP - 73

EP - 108

JO - Política y Gobierno

JF - Política y Gobierno

SN - 1665-2037

IS - 1

ER -