The Song of the Earth: A pragmatic rejoinder

Andrew Stables

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In 'The Song of the Earth', Jonathan Bate promotes ‘ecopoesis’, contrasting it with ‘ecopolitical’ poetry (and by implication, other forms of writing and expression). Like others recently, including Simon James and Michael Bonnett, he appropriates the notion of ‘dwelling’ from Heidegger to add force to this distinction. Bate's argument is effectively that we have more chance of protecting the environment if we engage in ecopoetic activity, involving a sense of immediate response to nature, than if we do not. This has obvious educational implications. If Bate, James and Bonnett are correct, then the educational pursuit of (eco)poetic sensibility will, of itself, contribute to education for a sustainable future by grounding human experience in nature; if their assertions are insupportable, and (eco)poetic sensibility does not afford privileged access to a state of nature, then the assumption cannot be made that the development of such sensibility will contribute to education for sustainability. I shall critique Bate's argument from a pragmatic perspective.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)796-807
Number of pages12
JournalEducational Philosophy and Theory
Volume42
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2010

Fingerprint

song
pragmatics
poetry
education
sustainability
experience
Education
Song
Sensibility
Poetics

Cite this

The Song of the Earth: A pragmatic rejoinder. / Stables, Andrew.

In: Educational Philosophy and Theory, Vol. 42, No. 7, 10.2010, p. 796-807.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Stables, Andrew. / The Song of the Earth: A pragmatic rejoinder. In: Educational Philosophy and Theory. 2010 ; Vol. 42, No. 7. pp. 796-807.
@article{372707c11055449f897e03ef49bf748a,
title = "The Song of the Earth: A pragmatic rejoinder",
abstract = "In 'The Song of the Earth', Jonathan Bate promotes ‘ecopoesis’, contrasting it with ‘ecopolitical’ poetry (and by implication, other forms of writing and expression). Like others recently, including Simon James and Michael Bonnett, he appropriates the notion of ‘dwelling’ from Heidegger to add force to this distinction. Bate's argument is effectively that we have more chance of protecting the environment if we engage in ecopoetic activity, involving a sense of immediate response to nature, than if we do not. This has obvious educational implications. If Bate, James and Bonnett are correct, then the educational pursuit of (eco)poetic sensibility will, of itself, contribute to education for a sustainable future by grounding human experience in nature; if their assertions are insupportable, and (eco)poetic sensibility does not afford privileged access to a state of nature, then the assumption cannot be made that the development of such sensibility will contribute to education for sustainability. I shall critique Bate's argument from a pragmatic perspective.",
author = "Andrew Stables",
year = "2010",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1111/j.1469-5812.2007.00387.x",
language = "English",
volume = "42",
pages = "796--807",
journal = "Educational Philosophy and Theory",
issn = "0013-1857",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Song of the Earth: A pragmatic rejoinder

AU - Stables, Andrew

PY - 2010/10

Y1 - 2010/10

N2 - In 'The Song of the Earth', Jonathan Bate promotes ‘ecopoesis’, contrasting it with ‘ecopolitical’ poetry (and by implication, other forms of writing and expression). Like others recently, including Simon James and Michael Bonnett, he appropriates the notion of ‘dwelling’ from Heidegger to add force to this distinction. Bate's argument is effectively that we have more chance of protecting the environment if we engage in ecopoetic activity, involving a sense of immediate response to nature, than if we do not. This has obvious educational implications. If Bate, James and Bonnett are correct, then the educational pursuit of (eco)poetic sensibility will, of itself, contribute to education for a sustainable future by grounding human experience in nature; if their assertions are insupportable, and (eco)poetic sensibility does not afford privileged access to a state of nature, then the assumption cannot be made that the development of such sensibility will contribute to education for sustainability. I shall critique Bate's argument from a pragmatic perspective.

AB - In 'The Song of the Earth', Jonathan Bate promotes ‘ecopoesis’, contrasting it with ‘ecopolitical’ poetry (and by implication, other forms of writing and expression). Like others recently, including Simon James and Michael Bonnett, he appropriates the notion of ‘dwelling’ from Heidegger to add force to this distinction. Bate's argument is effectively that we have more chance of protecting the environment if we engage in ecopoetic activity, involving a sense of immediate response to nature, than if we do not. This has obvious educational implications. If Bate, James and Bonnett are correct, then the educational pursuit of (eco)poetic sensibility will, of itself, contribute to education for a sustainable future by grounding human experience in nature; if their assertions are insupportable, and (eco)poetic sensibility does not afford privileged access to a state of nature, then the assumption cannot be made that the development of such sensibility will contribute to education for sustainability. I shall critique Bate's argument from a pragmatic perspective.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77956760365&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-5812.2007.00387.x

U2 - 10.1111/j.1469-5812.2007.00387.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1469-5812.2007.00387.x

M3 - Article

VL - 42

SP - 796

EP - 807

JO - Educational Philosophy and Theory

JF - Educational Philosophy and Theory

SN - 0013-1857

IS - 7

ER -