Abstract
This article illustrates how advice services create diverse public values within welfare reform. It develops a social impact framework using public value, realism, and complexity literature. Starting from a social return on investment study of advice, qualitative interviews are analysed with twenty-two clients, who sought advice for welfare benefits, and had disabilities, or physical or mental health conditions. Integrating these clients’ experiences with wider evidence illustrates how advice services advocated for people’s needs within a complicated (and controversial) welfare system. However, advice services face funding cuts, benefit assessment costs have risen, and welfare reforms have yet to meet their aims.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 238-263 |
Number of pages | 26 |
Journal | Public Management Review |
Volume | 21 |
Issue number | 2 |
Early online date | 18 May 2018 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2018 |
Keywords
- Advice services
- complexity
- disability
- mental health
- public value
- realist evaluation
- social impact
- social return on investment
- welfare reform
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Management Information Systems
- Management of Technology and Innovation