The significance of Zapatismo for democracy

Panel: The quality of democracy: leaders, parties and citizens Convenor: Laura Tedesco

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaper

Abstract

In this paper I explore the relationship between leadership and democracy by looking at (a) the role of Subcomandante Marcos’ anticaudillista leadership style for the development of indigenous democracy in the Zapatistas communities of Chiapas; (b) the impact of the principle of ‘command while obeying’ for a reconceptualisation of democracy in Latin America. My questions are: How does Marcos anti-caudillista leadership style -structured within traditional Mayan forms of governance based on ‘command while obeying’, facilitates the democratisation of the comunidades rebeldes in Chiapas? In what ways has this kind of leadership posed qualitative challenges to existing ideas of democracy and democratic politics in Latin America? I suggest that in order to answer these questions we are required to equipped ourselves with non Eurocentric and non Western understandings of democracy and indigenous resistance which are inevitably associated to the concept of buen vivir, to which ‘democracy’ is an essential component.
Original languageEnglish
Publication statusUnpublished - 2014
EventSLAS Annual 50 years anniversary Conference 2014 - Birkbeck, University of London, 3rd-4th April , London, UK United Kingdom
Duration: 3 Apr 20144 Apr 2014

Conference

ConferenceSLAS Annual 50 years anniversary Conference 2014
CountryUK United Kingdom
CityLondon
Period3/04/144/04/14

Fingerprint

leader
democracy
citizen
leadership
Latin America
democratization
governance
politics
community

Keywords

  • indigenous movements
  • zapatistas
  • leadership
  • democracy
  • command while obeying

Cite this

Dinerstein, A. C. (2014). The significance of Zapatismo for democracy: Panel: The quality of democracy: leaders, parties and citizens Convenor: Laura Tedesco . Paper presented at SLAS Annual 50 years anniversary Conference 2014, London, UK United Kingdom.

The significance of Zapatismo for democracy : Panel: The quality of democracy: leaders, parties and citizens Convenor: Laura Tedesco . / Dinerstein, A C.

2014. Paper presented at SLAS Annual 50 years anniversary Conference 2014, London, UK United Kingdom.

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaper

Dinerstein, AC 2014, 'The significance of Zapatismo for democracy: Panel: The quality of democracy: leaders, parties and citizens Convenor: Laura Tedesco ' Paper presented at SLAS Annual 50 years anniversary Conference 2014, London, UK United Kingdom, 3/04/14 - 4/04/14, .
Dinerstein AC. The significance of Zapatismo for democracy: Panel: The quality of democracy: leaders, parties and citizens Convenor: Laura Tedesco . 2014. Paper presented at SLAS Annual 50 years anniversary Conference 2014, London, UK United Kingdom.
Dinerstein, A C. / The significance of Zapatismo for democracy : Panel: The quality of democracy: leaders, parties and citizens Convenor: Laura Tedesco . Paper presented at SLAS Annual 50 years anniversary Conference 2014, London, UK United Kingdom.
@conference{b4db31780189471faf756bf011cb2499,
title = "The significance of Zapatismo for democracy: Panel: The quality of democracy: leaders, parties and citizens Convenor: Laura Tedesco",
abstract = "In this paper I explore the relationship between leadership and democracy by looking at (a) the role of Subcomandante Marcos’ anticaudillista leadership style for the development of indigenous democracy in the Zapatistas communities of Chiapas; (b) the impact of the principle of ‘command while obeying’ for a reconceptualisation of democracy in Latin America. My questions are: How does Marcos anti-caudillista leadership style -structured within traditional Mayan forms of governance based on ‘command while obeying’, facilitates the democratisation of the comunidades rebeldes in Chiapas? In what ways has this kind of leadership posed qualitative challenges to existing ideas of democracy and democratic politics in Latin America? I suggest that in order to answer these questions we are required to equipped ourselves with non Eurocentric and non Western understandings of democracy and indigenous resistance which are inevitably associated to the concept of buen vivir, to which ‘democracy’ is an essential component.",
keywords = "indigenous movements, zapatistas, leadership, democracy, command while obeying",
author = "Dinerstein, {A C}",
year = "2014",
language = "English",
note = "SLAS Annual 50 years anniversary Conference 2014 ; Conference date: 03-04-2014 Through 04-04-2014",

}

TY - CONF

T1 - The significance of Zapatismo for democracy

T2 - Panel: The quality of democracy: leaders, parties and citizens Convenor: Laura Tedesco

AU - Dinerstein, A C

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - In this paper I explore the relationship between leadership and democracy by looking at (a) the role of Subcomandante Marcos’ anticaudillista leadership style for the development of indigenous democracy in the Zapatistas communities of Chiapas; (b) the impact of the principle of ‘command while obeying’ for a reconceptualisation of democracy in Latin America. My questions are: How does Marcos anti-caudillista leadership style -structured within traditional Mayan forms of governance based on ‘command while obeying’, facilitates the democratisation of the comunidades rebeldes in Chiapas? In what ways has this kind of leadership posed qualitative challenges to existing ideas of democracy and democratic politics in Latin America? I suggest that in order to answer these questions we are required to equipped ourselves with non Eurocentric and non Western understandings of democracy and indigenous resistance which are inevitably associated to the concept of buen vivir, to which ‘democracy’ is an essential component.

AB - In this paper I explore the relationship between leadership and democracy by looking at (a) the role of Subcomandante Marcos’ anticaudillista leadership style for the development of indigenous democracy in the Zapatistas communities of Chiapas; (b) the impact of the principle of ‘command while obeying’ for a reconceptualisation of democracy in Latin America. My questions are: How does Marcos anti-caudillista leadership style -structured within traditional Mayan forms of governance based on ‘command while obeying’, facilitates the democratisation of the comunidades rebeldes in Chiapas? In what ways has this kind of leadership posed qualitative challenges to existing ideas of democracy and democratic politics in Latin America? I suggest that in order to answer these questions we are required to equipped ourselves with non Eurocentric and non Western understandings of democracy and indigenous resistance which are inevitably associated to the concept of buen vivir, to which ‘democracy’ is an essential component.

KW - indigenous movements

KW - zapatistas

KW - leadership

KW - democracy

KW - command while obeying

M3 - Paper

ER -