TY - GEN
T1 - The sensitivity study of a mechanical loss model in turbocharger system
AU - Wang, Haizhu
AU - Burke, Richard
AU - Copeland, Colin
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2020 ASME
Copyright:
Copyright 2021 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2020/12/14
Y1 - 2020/12/14
N2 - 3D modelling can be a very useful tool for optimising the design of turbocharger turbines. However, it is difficult to achieve high levels of correlation with experimental data which can undermine confidence in the 3D model results. A key difference between modelling and experiments is the way turbine efficiency is estimated: in CFD this is estimated directly from the shaft torque created by the turbine, however in experiments this is usually estimated based on the enthalpy rise measured at the compressor. This means that there is an inherent offset between the two which is the mechanical losses of the bearing system used to support the connecting shaft. The accuracy of the mechanical loss estimate can therefore play a critical role in the correlation of 3D modelling with experiments. A 3D CFD model of a turbocharger turbine of a 1.5L gasoline engine has been coupled with a 0D mechanical losses model. The model comprises of seven parameters that characterise the bearing losses such as oil film thickness, bearing surface finish and clearances. A sensitivity study is conducted on these parameters to understand which are the critical aspects that should be parameterised and what relationship these parameters may have with the operating state of the turbocharger (shaft speed, shaft torque etc.). Experimental measurements were conducted for the same turbocharger to provide a baseline for assessing the impact of the mechanical losses model. These provide the boundary conditions to the CFD by ignoring the effects of heat transfer, and the results were compared to the 3D simulation results.
AB - 3D modelling can be a very useful tool for optimising the design of turbocharger turbines. However, it is difficult to achieve high levels of correlation with experimental data which can undermine confidence in the 3D model results. A key difference between modelling and experiments is the way turbine efficiency is estimated: in CFD this is estimated directly from the shaft torque created by the turbine, however in experiments this is usually estimated based on the enthalpy rise measured at the compressor. This means that there is an inherent offset between the two which is the mechanical losses of the bearing system used to support the connecting shaft. The accuracy of the mechanical loss estimate can therefore play a critical role in the correlation of 3D modelling with experiments. A 3D CFD model of a turbocharger turbine of a 1.5L gasoline engine has been coupled with a 0D mechanical losses model. The model comprises of seven parameters that characterise the bearing losses such as oil film thickness, bearing surface finish and clearances. A sensitivity study is conducted on these parameters to understand which are the critical aspects that should be parameterised and what relationship these parameters may have with the operating state of the turbocharger (shaft speed, shaft torque etc.). Experimental measurements were conducted for the same turbocharger to provide a baseline for assessing the impact of the mechanical losses model. These provide the boundary conditions to the CFD by ignoring the effects of heat transfer, and the results were compared to the 3D simulation results.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85104807936&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1115/ICEF2020-2951
DO - 10.1115/ICEF2020-2951
M3 - Chapter in a published conference proceeding
AN - SCOPUS:85104807936
T3 - ASME 2020 Internal Combustion Engine Division Fall Technical Conference, ICEF 2020
BT - ASME 2020 Internal Combustion Engine Division Fall Technical Conference, ICEF 2020
PB - The American Society of Mechanical Engineers(ASME)
T2 - ASME 2020 Internal Combustion Engine Division Fall Technical Conference, ICEF 2020
Y2 - 4 November 2020 through 6 November 2020
ER -