The same old methodologies? Perspectives on OM research in the post-lean age

Bart L. MacCarthy, Michael Lewis, Chris Voss, Ram Narasimhan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  • 23 Citations

Abstract

Purpose: The world is changing - economically, technologically, politically, and socially. As an academic discipline, operations management (OM) is, almost by definition, close to practice. Are our OM research methods fit for purpose for the new age? This paper reflects on and develops the principal themes discussed in the "OM Methodology" Special Session at the 2011 EurOMA Conference in Cambridge, UK. The paper aims to discuss these issues.

Design/methodology/approach: The emerging landscape in which future OM research will be conducted is discussed. The paper provides a range of perspectives on the research challenges facing the discipline with respect to what the authors research and how the authors research it. The range of methods open to us and their relative merits and challenges are debated.

Findings: The traditional research divide between quantitative modelling, often normative in outlook, and the more reflective modes of qualitative enquiry, with a wide spectrum of empirical work in between, is reflected in the different academic traditions, groupings, conferences, and publications across the discipline. Research should not be driven by methodological convenience but by the needs of a changing world. Rather than a sterile "quants versus qual" debate, the paper argues that a rich diversity of approaches can provide a reinforcing cycle to generate relevant, interesting and exciting research underpinned by robust and valid theory.

Originality/value: The paper presents detailed reflections from leading researchers on contemporary and future OM research, arguing that research approaches must evolve that reflect the new realities to further enhance OM as a theoretically sound and practically relevant discipline.
LanguageEnglish
Pages934-956
Number of pages23
JournalInternational Journal of Operations & Production Management
Volume33
Issue number7
DOIs
StatusPublished - 2013

Fingerprint

Management research
Operations management
Methodology
Acoustic waves
Research methods
Grouping
Design methodology
Modeling

Cite this

The same old methodologies? Perspectives on OM research in the post-lean age. / MacCarthy, Bart L.; Lewis, Michael; Voss, Chris; Narasimhan, Ram.

In: International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 33, No. 7, 2013, p. 934-956.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{a0ccc63fc4244ee8a2831ccea0b2621c,
title = "The same old methodologies? Perspectives on OM research in the post-lean age",
abstract = "Purpose: The world is changing - economically, technologically, politically, and socially. As an academic discipline, operations management (OM) is, almost by definition, close to practice. Are our OM research methods fit for purpose for the new age? This paper reflects on and develops the principal themes discussed in the {"}OM Methodology{"} Special Session at the 2011 EurOMA Conference in Cambridge, UK. The paper aims to discuss these issues. Design/methodology/approach: The emerging landscape in which future OM research will be conducted is discussed. The paper provides a range of perspectives on the research challenges facing the discipline with respect to what the authors research and how the authors research it. The range of methods open to us and their relative merits and challenges are debated. Findings: The traditional research divide between quantitative modelling, often normative in outlook, and the more reflective modes of qualitative enquiry, with a wide spectrum of empirical work in between, is reflected in the different academic traditions, groupings, conferences, and publications across the discipline. Research should not be driven by methodological convenience but by the needs of a changing world. Rather than a sterile {"}quants versus qual{"} debate, the paper argues that a rich diversity of approaches can provide a reinforcing cycle to generate relevant, interesting and exciting research underpinned by robust and valid theory. Originality/value: The paper presents detailed reflections from leading researchers on contemporary and future OM research, arguing that research approaches must evolve that reflect the new realities to further enhance OM as a theoretically sound and practically relevant discipline.",
author = "MacCarthy, {Bart L.} and Michael Lewis and Chris Voss and Ram Narasimhan",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1108/IJOPM-08-2013-0373",
language = "English",
volume = "33",
pages = "934--956",
journal = "International Journal of Operations & Production Management",
issn = "0144-3577",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The same old methodologies? Perspectives on OM research in the post-lean age

AU - MacCarthy,Bart L.

AU - Lewis,Michael

AU - Voss,Chris

AU - Narasimhan,Ram

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - Purpose: The world is changing - economically, technologically, politically, and socially. As an academic discipline, operations management (OM) is, almost by definition, close to practice. Are our OM research methods fit for purpose for the new age? This paper reflects on and develops the principal themes discussed in the "OM Methodology" Special Session at the 2011 EurOMA Conference in Cambridge, UK. The paper aims to discuss these issues. Design/methodology/approach: The emerging landscape in which future OM research will be conducted is discussed. The paper provides a range of perspectives on the research challenges facing the discipline with respect to what the authors research and how the authors research it. The range of methods open to us and their relative merits and challenges are debated. Findings: The traditional research divide between quantitative modelling, often normative in outlook, and the more reflective modes of qualitative enquiry, with a wide spectrum of empirical work in between, is reflected in the different academic traditions, groupings, conferences, and publications across the discipline. Research should not be driven by methodological convenience but by the needs of a changing world. Rather than a sterile "quants versus qual" debate, the paper argues that a rich diversity of approaches can provide a reinforcing cycle to generate relevant, interesting and exciting research underpinned by robust and valid theory. Originality/value: The paper presents detailed reflections from leading researchers on contemporary and future OM research, arguing that research approaches must evolve that reflect the new realities to further enhance OM as a theoretically sound and practically relevant discipline.

AB - Purpose: The world is changing - economically, technologically, politically, and socially. As an academic discipline, operations management (OM) is, almost by definition, close to practice. Are our OM research methods fit for purpose for the new age? This paper reflects on and develops the principal themes discussed in the "OM Methodology" Special Session at the 2011 EurOMA Conference in Cambridge, UK. The paper aims to discuss these issues. Design/methodology/approach: The emerging landscape in which future OM research will be conducted is discussed. The paper provides a range of perspectives on the research challenges facing the discipline with respect to what the authors research and how the authors research it. The range of methods open to us and their relative merits and challenges are debated. Findings: The traditional research divide between quantitative modelling, often normative in outlook, and the more reflective modes of qualitative enquiry, with a wide spectrum of empirical work in between, is reflected in the different academic traditions, groupings, conferences, and publications across the discipline. Research should not be driven by methodological convenience but by the needs of a changing world. Rather than a sterile "quants versus qual" debate, the paper argues that a rich diversity of approaches can provide a reinforcing cycle to generate relevant, interesting and exciting research underpinned by robust and valid theory. Originality/value: The paper presents detailed reflections from leading researchers on contemporary and future OM research, arguing that research approaches must evolve that reflect the new realities to further enhance OM as a theoretically sound and practically relevant discipline.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84883388982&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-08-2013-0373

U2 - 10.1108/IJOPM-08-2013-0373

DO - 10.1108/IJOPM-08-2013-0373

M3 - Article

VL - 33

SP - 934

EP - 956

JO - International Journal of Operations & Production Management

T2 - International Journal of Operations & Production Management

JF - International Journal of Operations & Production Management

SN - 0144-3577

IS - 7

ER -