The roots of reactionary tech oligarchy and the need for radical democratic alternatives

Johan Farkas, Aurelien Mondon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

13 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The aim for this commentary is two-fold: first, we seek to outline how decades of liberal “post-democratic” hegemony—prevalent across liberal democratic parliaments, journalism, and academia—have enabled the rise of reactionary tech oligarchy. Second, we call for cross-disciplinary and cross-societal alliances that not only reject depoliticized euphemisms such as “polarization,” “populism,” and “post-truth,” but also actively commit to building radical democratic alternatives to both the failed liberal democratic status quo and its authoritarian outgrowth. Departing from the growing overt involvements of tech billionaires in authoritarian movements—financially, politically, discursively—we build on emergent scholarship to highlight failures in understanding the rise of reactionary tech, through its historical roots, financial and political power, and discursive reach.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)123-126
Number of pages4
JournalCommunication Culture & Critique
Volume18
Issue number2
Early online date3 Jun 2025
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 30 Jun 2025

Data Availability Statement

No new data were generated or analysed in support of
this research.

Keywords

  • authoritarianism
  • far right
  • polarization
  • populism
  • post-democracy
  • post-truth
  • reactionary politics
  • reactionary tech oligarchy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cultural Studies
  • Communication
  • Computer Science Applications

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The roots of reactionary tech oligarchy and the need for radical democratic alternatives'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this