The role of motivation in distracting attention away from pain: an experimental study

K Verhoeven, G Crombez, Christopher Eccleston, D M L Van Ryckeghem, S Morley, S Van Damme

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  • 67 Citations

Abstract

Research on the effectiveness of distraction as a method of pain control is inconclusive. One mechanism pertains to the motivational relevance of distraction tasks. In this study the motivation to engage in a distraction task during pain was experimentally manipulated. Undergraduate students (N = 73) participated in a cold pressor test (CPT) and were randomly assigned to three groups: a distraction-only group performed a tone-detection task during the CPT, a motivated-distraction group performed the same task and received a monetary reward for good task performance, and a control group did not perform the tone-detection task. Results indicated that engagement in the distraction task was better in the motivated-distraction group in comparison with the distraction-only group. Participants in both distraction groups experienced less pain compared to the control group. There were no overall differences in pain intensity between the two distraction groups. The effect of distraction was influenced by the level of catastrophic thinking about pain. For low catastrophizers, both distraction groups reported less pain as compared to the non-distracted control group. This was not the case for high catastrophizers. For high catastrophizers it mattered whether the distraction task was motivationally relevant: high catastrophizers reported less intense pain in the motivated-distraction group, as compared to the non-distracted control group. We conclude that increasing the motivational relevance of the distraction task may increase the effects of distraction, especially for those who catastrophize about pain.
LanguageEnglish
Pages229-234
Number of pages6
JournalPain
Volume149
Issue number2
DOIs
StatusPublished - May 2010

Fingerprint

Motivation
Pain
Control Groups
Catastrophization
Task Performance and Analysis
Reward
Students
Research

Keywords

  • attention to pain
  • motivation
  • distraction
  • distraction task
  • catastrophizing

Cite this

Verhoeven, K., Crombez, G., Eccleston, C., Van Ryckeghem, D. M. L., Morley, S., & Van Damme, S. (2010). The role of motivation in distracting attention away from pain: an experimental study. DOI: 10.1016/j.pain.2010.01.019

The role of motivation in distracting attention away from pain: an experimental study. / Verhoeven, K; Crombez, G; Eccleston, Christopher; Van Ryckeghem, D M L; Morley, S; Van Damme, S.

In: Pain, Vol. 149, No. 2, 05.2010, p. 229-234.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Verhoeven, K, Crombez, G, Eccleston, C, Van Ryckeghem, DML, Morley, S & Van Damme, S 2010, 'The role of motivation in distracting attention away from pain: an experimental study' Pain, vol. 149, no. 2, pp. 229-234. DOI: 10.1016/j.pain.2010.01.019
Verhoeven K, Crombez G, Eccleston C, Van Ryckeghem DML, Morley S, Van Damme S. The role of motivation in distracting attention away from pain: an experimental study. Pain. 2010 May;149(2):229-234. Available from, DOI: 10.1016/j.pain.2010.01.019
Verhoeven, K ; Crombez, G ; Eccleston, Christopher ; Van Ryckeghem, D M L ; Morley, S ; Van Damme, S. / The role of motivation in distracting attention away from pain: an experimental study. In: Pain. 2010 ; Vol. 149, No. 2. pp. 229-234
@article{b5935ab5da784c8db06132dfc8435a3e,
title = "The role of motivation in distracting attention away from pain: an experimental study",
abstract = "Research on the effectiveness of distraction as a method of pain control is inconclusive. One mechanism pertains to the motivational relevance of distraction tasks. In this study the motivation to engage in a distraction task during pain was experimentally manipulated. Undergraduate students (N = 73) participated in a cold pressor test (CPT) and were randomly assigned to three groups: a distraction-only group performed a tone-detection task during the CPT, a motivated-distraction group performed the same task and received a monetary reward for good task performance, and a control group did not perform the tone-detection task. Results indicated that engagement in the distraction task was better in the motivated-distraction group in comparison with the distraction-only group. Participants in both distraction groups experienced less pain compared to the control group. There were no overall differences in pain intensity between the two distraction groups. The effect of distraction was influenced by the level of catastrophic thinking about pain. For low catastrophizers, both distraction groups reported less pain as compared to the non-distracted control group. This was not the case for high catastrophizers. For high catastrophizers it mattered whether the distraction task was motivationally relevant: high catastrophizers reported less intense pain in the motivated-distraction group, as compared to the non-distracted control group. We conclude that increasing the motivational relevance of the distraction task may increase the effects of distraction, especially for those who catastrophize about pain.",
keywords = "attention to pain, motivation, distraction, distraction task, catastrophizing",
author = "K Verhoeven and G Crombez and Christopher Eccleston and {Van Ryckeghem}, {D M L} and S Morley and {Van Damme}, S",
year = "2010",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1016/j.pain.2010.01.019",
language = "English",
volume = "149",
pages = "229--234",
journal = "Pain",
issn = "0304-3959",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The role of motivation in distracting attention away from pain: an experimental study

AU - Verhoeven,K

AU - Crombez,G

AU - Eccleston,Christopher

AU - Van Ryckeghem,D M L

AU - Morley,S

AU - Van Damme,S

PY - 2010/5

Y1 - 2010/5

N2 - Research on the effectiveness of distraction as a method of pain control is inconclusive. One mechanism pertains to the motivational relevance of distraction tasks. In this study the motivation to engage in a distraction task during pain was experimentally manipulated. Undergraduate students (N = 73) participated in a cold pressor test (CPT) and were randomly assigned to three groups: a distraction-only group performed a tone-detection task during the CPT, a motivated-distraction group performed the same task and received a monetary reward for good task performance, and a control group did not perform the tone-detection task. Results indicated that engagement in the distraction task was better in the motivated-distraction group in comparison with the distraction-only group. Participants in both distraction groups experienced less pain compared to the control group. There were no overall differences in pain intensity between the two distraction groups. The effect of distraction was influenced by the level of catastrophic thinking about pain. For low catastrophizers, both distraction groups reported less pain as compared to the non-distracted control group. This was not the case for high catastrophizers. For high catastrophizers it mattered whether the distraction task was motivationally relevant: high catastrophizers reported less intense pain in the motivated-distraction group, as compared to the non-distracted control group. We conclude that increasing the motivational relevance of the distraction task may increase the effects of distraction, especially for those who catastrophize about pain.

AB - Research on the effectiveness of distraction as a method of pain control is inconclusive. One mechanism pertains to the motivational relevance of distraction tasks. In this study the motivation to engage in a distraction task during pain was experimentally manipulated. Undergraduate students (N = 73) participated in a cold pressor test (CPT) and were randomly assigned to three groups: a distraction-only group performed a tone-detection task during the CPT, a motivated-distraction group performed the same task and received a monetary reward for good task performance, and a control group did not perform the tone-detection task. Results indicated that engagement in the distraction task was better in the motivated-distraction group in comparison with the distraction-only group. Participants in both distraction groups experienced less pain compared to the control group. There were no overall differences in pain intensity between the two distraction groups. The effect of distraction was influenced by the level of catastrophic thinking about pain. For low catastrophizers, both distraction groups reported less pain as compared to the non-distracted control group. This was not the case for high catastrophizers. For high catastrophizers it mattered whether the distraction task was motivationally relevant: high catastrophizers reported less intense pain in the motivated-distraction group, as compared to the non-distracted control group. We conclude that increasing the motivational relevance of the distraction task may increase the effects of distraction, especially for those who catastrophize about pain.

KW - attention to pain

KW - motivation

KW - distraction

KW - distraction task

KW - catastrophizing

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77951769653&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2010.01.019

U2 - 10.1016/j.pain.2010.01.019

DO - 10.1016/j.pain.2010.01.019

M3 - Article

VL - 149

SP - 229

EP - 234

JO - Pain

T2 - Pain

JF - Pain

SN - 0304-3959

IS - 2

ER -