Abstract
Karmic belief—the expectation that actions bring about morally congruent outcomes within and across lifetimes—is central to many, particularly Eastern, religions. This research (N = 704) examined whether karmic beliefs and cultural context (predominantly Christian Americans and Hindu Indians) moderated the indirect effect of learning about others’ morally congruent or incongruent negative outcomes on immanent justice reasoning (causally attributing misfortune to someone’s prior misdeeds) through perceived deservingness. Results revealed that the indirect effect of congruency on immanent justice attributions via deservingness was stronger for people higher in karmic beliefs, because they strengthened the effect of congruency on immanent justice attributions and the relationship between deservingness and immanent justice attributions. The indirect effect of congruency on immanent justice attributions through deservingness was also stronger in the United States. These results highlight the role that karmic beliefs play in how people reason about the causes of others’ fortunes and misfortunes.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 278-282 |
Number of pages | 4 |
Journal | Psychology of Religion and Spirituality |
Volume | 14 |
Issue number | 2 |
Early online date | 20 Aug 2020 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 31 May 2022 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2020. American Psychological Association
Keywords
- Culture
- Deservingness
- Immanent justice reasoning
- Karma
- Moderated mediation
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Social Psychology
- Religious studies
- Applied Psychology