The role of executive processes in prospective memory tasks

S van den Berg, A Aarts, C Midden, B Verplanken

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Prospective remembering refers to remembering and acting on behavioural intentions. Three experiments tested the hypothesis that prospective remembering requires the availability of executive processes. It was expected that this is more important when intentions are stated in categorical terms. Type of instruction (specific versus categorical), typicality of the cue in relation to the category specified, and executive load were manipulated. Results showed a general benefit of specific instructions. Furthermore, with categorical instructions, performance was better with typical cues. Although the data suggested that executive processes are responsible for the processing of cues, the load manipulation had no significant effect on the prospective memory measure. Thus, no evidence was found for the hypothesis that prospective remembering requires the availability of executive processes. It is argued that it is a matter of strategic choice whether executive processes arc deployed: One does not need to monitor for cues but can choose to rely on bottom-up processes. Monitoring may be sufficient, but not necessary for successful prospective remembering. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved) (journal abstract
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)511-533
Number of pages23
JournalEuropean Journal of Cognitive Psychology
Volume16
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - 2004

Fingerprint

Episodic Memory
Cues

Cite this

The role of executive processes in prospective memory tasks. / van den Berg, S; Aarts, A; Midden, C; Verplanken, B.

In: European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, Vol. 16, No. 4, 2004, p. 511-533.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

van den Berg, S, Aarts, A, Midden, C & Verplanken, B 2004, 'The role of executive processes in prospective memory tasks', European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 511-533.
van den Berg, S ; Aarts, A ; Midden, C ; Verplanken, B. / The role of executive processes in prospective memory tasks. In: European Journal of Cognitive Psychology. 2004 ; Vol. 16, No. 4. pp. 511-533.
@article{93d79c73d4f840f0956d25f37a52ed15,
title = "The role of executive processes in prospective memory tasks",
abstract = "Prospective remembering refers to remembering and acting on behavioural intentions. Three experiments tested the hypothesis that prospective remembering requires the availability of executive processes. It was expected that this is more important when intentions are stated in categorical terms. Type of instruction (specific versus categorical), typicality of the cue in relation to the category specified, and executive load were manipulated. Results showed a general benefit of specific instructions. Furthermore, with categorical instructions, performance was better with typical cues. Although the data suggested that executive processes are responsible for the processing of cues, the load manipulation had no significant effect on the prospective memory measure. Thus, no evidence was found for the hypothesis that prospective remembering requires the availability of executive processes. It is argued that it is a matter of strategic choice whether executive processes arc deployed: One does not need to monitor for cues but can choose to rely on bottom-up processes. Monitoring may be sufficient, but not necessary for successful prospective remembering. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved) (journal abstract",
author = "{van den Berg}, S and A Aarts and C Midden and B Verplanken",
year = "2004",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
pages = "511--533",
journal = "European Journal of Cognitive Psychology",
issn = "0954-1446",
publisher = "Psychology Press Ltd",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The role of executive processes in prospective memory tasks

AU - van den Berg, S

AU - Aarts, A

AU - Midden, C

AU - Verplanken, B

PY - 2004

Y1 - 2004

N2 - Prospective remembering refers to remembering and acting on behavioural intentions. Three experiments tested the hypothesis that prospective remembering requires the availability of executive processes. It was expected that this is more important when intentions are stated in categorical terms. Type of instruction (specific versus categorical), typicality of the cue in relation to the category specified, and executive load were manipulated. Results showed a general benefit of specific instructions. Furthermore, with categorical instructions, performance was better with typical cues. Although the data suggested that executive processes are responsible for the processing of cues, the load manipulation had no significant effect on the prospective memory measure. Thus, no evidence was found for the hypothesis that prospective remembering requires the availability of executive processes. It is argued that it is a matter of strategic choice whether executive processes arc deployed: One does not need to monitor for cues but can choose to rely on bottom-up processes. Monitoring may be sufficient, but not necessary for successful prospective remembering. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved) (journal abstract

AB - Prospective remembering refers to remembering and acting on behavioural intentions. Three experiments tested the hypothesis that prospective remembering requires the availability of executive processes. It was expected that this is more important when intentions are stated in categorical terms. Type of instruction (specific versus categorical), typicality of the cue in relation to the category specified, and executive load were manipulated. Results showed a general benefit of specific instructions. Furthermore, with categorical instructions, performance was better with typical cues. Although the data suggested that executive processes are responsible for the processing of cues, the load manipulation had no significant effect on the prospective memory measure. Thus, no evidence was found for the hypothesis that prospective remembering requires the availability of executive processes. It is argued that it is a matter of strategic choice whether executive processes arc deployed: One does not need to monitor for cues but can choose to rely on bottom-up processes. Monitoring may be sufficient, but not necessary for successful prospective remembering. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved) (journal abstract

M3 - Article

VL - 16

SP - 511

EP - 533

JO - European Journal of Cognitive Psychology

JF - European Journal of Cognitive Psychology

SN - 0954-1446

IS - 4

ER -