Abstract
Many models of choice assume that people retrieve memories of past experiences and use them to guide evaluation and choice. In this paper, we examine whether samples of recalled past experiences do indeed underpin our evaluations of options. We showed participants sequences of numerical values and asked them to recall as many of those values as possible and also to state how much they would be willing to pay for another draw from the sequence. Using Bayesian mixed effects modeling, we predicted participants’ evaluation of the sequences at the group level from either the average of the values they recalled or the average of the values they saw. Contrary to the predictions of recall-based models, people’s evaluations appear to be sensitive to information beyond what was actually recalled. Moreover, we did not find consistent evidence that memory for specific items is sufficient to predict evaluation of sequences. We discuss the implications for sampling models of memory and decision-making and alternative explanations.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Number of pages | 11 |
Journal | Psychonomic Bulletin & Review |
Early online date | 29 Nov 2023 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 29 Nov 2023 |
Keywords
- Episodic memory
- Free recall
- Judgment
- Retrospective evaluation
- Sampling
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Developmental and Educational Psychology