The role for simulations in theory construction for the social sciences: Case studies concerning Divergent Modes of Religiosity

Harvey Whitehouse, Ken Kahn, Michael E. Hochberg, Joanna J. Bryson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  • 22 Citations

Abstract

Religion is, at the very least, a highly complex social phenomenon. The theories we use to understand religion – and sociocultural systems more generally – are often so complex that even experts in the field may not be able to see all their consequences. Social simulations can help us understand and communicate the consequences of a theory, provided we can describe the theory with sufficient precision and comprehensiveness in order to run it on a computer. In this article we demonstrate the benefits of simulating the predictions of a well-known theory in the Cognitive Science of Religion, the theory of Divergent Modes of Religiosity. Many of these predictions have already been tested against contemporary and longitudinal evidence, using the methods of both qualitative case study and large-scale survey, and some of the mechanisms responsible for the patterns observed have been investigated by means of controlled experiments. Nevertheless, in simulating the patterns of religious transmission and transformation predicted by the modes theory we discovered numerous aspects that were underspecified, generating new hypotheses for investigation in future empirical research. This back-and-forth between simulation and theory testing has the potential to accelerate progress in the scientific study of religion.
LanguageEnglish
Pages182-201
JournalReligion, Brain & Behavior
Volume2
Issue number3
DOIs
StatusPublished - 2012

Fingerprint

Social Sciences
Religion
Cognitive Science
Empirical Research

Cite this

The role for simulations in theory construction for the social sciences : Case studies concerning Divergent Modes of Religiosity. / Whitehouse, Harvey; Kahn, Ken; Hochberg, Michael E.; Bryson, Joanna J.

In: Religion, Brain & Behavior, Vol. 2, No. 3, 2012, p. 182-201.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{3352ab875db94c8cb956d7c66cd13486,
title = "The role for simulations in theory construction for the social sciences: Case studies concerning Divergent Modes of Religiosity",
abstract = "Religion is, at the very least, a highly complex social phenomenon. The theories we use to understand religion – and sociocultural systems more generally – are often so complex that even experts in the field may not be able to see all their consequences. Social simulations can help us understand and communicate the consequences of a theory, provided we can describe the theory with sufficient precision and comprehensiveness in order to run it on a computer. In this article we demonstrate the benefits of simulating the predictions of a well-known theory in the Cognitive Science of Religion, the theory of Divergent Modes of Religiosity. Many of these predictions have already been tested against contemporary and longitudinal evidence, using the methods of both qualitative case study and large-scale survey, and some of the mechanisms responsible for the patterns observed have been investigated by means of controlled experiments. Nevertheless, in simulating the patterns of religious transmission and transformation predicted by the modes theory we discovered numerous aspects that were underspecified, generating new hypotheses for investigation in future empirical research. This back-and-forth between simulation and theory testing has the potential to accelerate progress in the scientific study of religion.",
author = "Harvey Whitehouse and Ken Kahn and Hochberg, {Michael E.} and Bryson, {Joanna J.}",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.1080/2153599X.2012.691033",
language = "English",
volume = "2",
pages = "182--201",
journal = "Religion, Brain & Behavior",
issn = "2153-599X",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The role for simulations in theory construction for the social sciences

T2 - Religion, Brain & Behavior

AU - Whitehouse, Harvey

AU - Kahn, Ken

AU - Hochberg, Michael E.

AU - Bryson, Joanna J.

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - Religion is, at the very least, a highly complex social phenomenon. The theories we use to understand religion – and sociocultural systems more generally – are often so complex that even experts in the field may not be able to see all their consequences. Social simulations can help us understand and communicate the consequences of a theory, provided we can describe the theory with sufficient precision and comprehensiveness in order to run it on a computer. In this article we demonstrate the benefits of simulating the predictions of a well-known theory in the Cognitive Science of Religion, the theory of Divergent Modes of Religiosity. Many of these predictions have already been tested against contemporary and longitudinal evidence, using the methods of both qualitative case study and large-scale survey, and some of the mechanisms responsible for the patterns observed have been investigated by means of controlled experiments. Nevertheless, in simulating the patterns of religious transmission and transformation predicted by the modes theory we discovered numerous aspects that were underspecified, generating new hypotheses for investigation in future empirical research. This back-and-forth between simulation and theory testing has the potential to accelerate progress in the scientific study of religion.

AB - Religion is, at the very least, a highly complex social phenomenon. The theories we use to understand religion – and sociocultural systems more generally – are often so complex that even experts in the field may not be able to see all their consequences. Social simulations can help us understand and communicate the consequences of a theory, provided we can describe the theory with sufficient precision and comprehensiveness in order to run it on a computer. In this article we demonstrate the benefits of simulating the predictions of a well-known theory in the Cognitive Science of Religion, the theory of Divergent Modes of Religiosity. Many of these predictions have already been tested against contemporary and longitudinal evidence, using the methods of both qualitative case study and large-scale survey, and some of the mechanisms responsible for the patterns observed have been investigated by means of controlled experiments. Nevertheless, in simulating the patterns of religious transmission and transformation predicted by the modes theory we discovered numerous aspects that were underspecified, generating new hypotheses for investigation in future empirical research. This back-and-forth between simulation and theory testing has the potential to accelerate progress in the scientific study of religion.

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/2153599X.2012.691033

U2 - 10.1080/2153599X.2012.691033

DO - 10.1080/2153599X.2012.691033

M3 - Article

VL - 2

SP - 182

EP - 201

JO - Religion, Brain & Behavior

JF - Religion, Brain & Behavior

SN - 2153-599X

IS - 3

ER -