The revealed preferences of high technology acquirers

an analysis of the characteristics of their targets

Panos Desyllas, Alan Hughes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper investigates whether acquisitions involving public high technology firms are best understood in terms of acquirers taking over firms with ‘superior’ innovation performance to access their assets, or acquiring firms with ‘inferior’ innovation performance to turn them around. Innovation performance is proxied by R&D-intensity (R&D expenditure over assets), patent-intensity (patents per US$million of assets), i.e. the R&D productivity of a firm's assets, and the patent stock, i.e. the accumulated R&D output. We find substantial overlaps between target and non-acquired firm characteristics. Nevertheless targets have a relatively high R&D-intensity and a large patent stock, which is consistent with acquirers targeting firms with a superior innovation performance. However, these targets have significantly lower pre-acquisition patent-intensity and hence a lower R&D productivity. The targets are also experiencing weak financial performance. Our results are consistent with a selection process in which acquirers seek out firms that have a superior past innovation performance, but that are failing in terms of recent R&D productivity and financial performance. A comparison of the performance of the targets with their acquirers reinforces this conclusion.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1089-1111
Number of pages23
JournalCambridge Journal of Economics
Volume33
Issue number6
Early online date25 Feb 2009
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2009

Fingerprint

Revealed preference
Innovation performance
Patents
High technology
Assets
Productivity
Financial performance
Targeting
R&D intensity
Selection process
Firm characteristics
High-technology firms
Expenditure

Cite this

The revealed preferences of high technology acquirers : an analysis of the characteristics of their targets. / Desyllas, Panos; Hughes, Alan.

In: Cambridge Journal of Economics, Vol. 33, No. 6, 11.2009, p. 1089-1111.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{4ef23f704f6140dfbb09d513f83de865,
title = "The revealed preferences of high technology acquirers: an analysis of the characteristics of their targets",
abstract = "This paper investigates whether acquisitions involving public high technology firms are best understood in terms of acquirers taking over firms with ‘superior’ innovation performance to access their assets, or acquiring firms with ‘inferior’ innovation performance to turn them around. Innovation performance is proxied by R&D-intensity (R&D expenditure over assets), patent-intensity (patents per US$million of assets), i.e. the R&D productivity of a firm's assets, and the patent stock, i.e. the accumulated R&D output. We find substantial overlaps between target and non-acquired firm characteristics. Nevertheless targets have a relatively high R&D-intensity and a large patent stock, which is consistent with acquirers targeting firms with a superior innovation performance. However, these targets have significantly lower pre-acquisition patent-intensity and hence a lower R&D productivity. The targets are also experiencing weak financial performance. Our results are consistent with a selection process in which acquirers seek out firms that have a superior past innovation performance, but that are failing in terms of recent R&D productivity and financial performance. A comparison of the performance of the targets with their acquirers reinforces this conclusion.",
author = "Panos Desyllas and Alan Hughes",
year = "2009",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1093/cje/bep004",
language = "English",
volume = "33",
pages = "1089--1111",
journal = "Cambridge Journal of Economics",
issn = "0309-166X",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The revealed preferences of high technology acquirers

T2 - an analysis of the characteristics of their targets

AU - Desyllas, Panos

AU - Hughes, Alan

PY - 2009/11

Y1 - 2009/11

N2 - This paper investigates whether acquisitions involving public high technology firms are best understood in terms of acquirers taking over firms with ‘superior’ innovation performance to access their assets, or acquiring firms with ‘inferior’ innovation performance to turn them around. Innovation performance is proxied by R&D-intensity (R&D expenditure over assets), patent-intensity (patents per US$million of assets), i.e. the R&D productivity of a firm's assets, and the patent stock, i.e. the accumulated R&D output. We find substantial overlaps between target and non-acquired firm characteristics. Nevertheless targets have a relatively high R&D-intensity and a large patent stock, which is consistent with acquirers targeting firms with a superior innovation performance. However, these targets have significantly lower pre-acquisition patent-intensity and hence a lower R&D productivity. The targets are also experiencing weak financial performance. Our results are consistent with a selection process in which acquirers seek out firms that have a superior past innovation performance, but that are failing in terms of recent R&D productivity and financial performance. A comparison of the performance of the targets with their acquirers reinforces this conclusion.

AB - This paper investigates whether acquisitions involving public high technology firms are best understood in terms of acquirers taking over firms with ‘superior’ innovation performance to access their assets, or acquiring firms with ‘inferior’ innovation performance to turn them around. Innovation performance is proxied by R&D-intensity (R&D expenditure over assets), patent-intensity (patents per US$million of assets), i.e. the R&D productivity of a firm's assets, and the patent stock, i.e. the accumulated R&D output. We find substantial overlaps between target and non-acquired firm characteristics. Nevertheless targets have a relatively high R&D-intensity and a large patent stock, which is consistent with acquirers targeting firms with a superior innovation performance. However, these targets have significantly lower pre-acquisition patent-intensity and hence a lower R&D productivity. The targets are also experiencing weak financial performance. Our results are consistent with a selection process in which acquirers seek out firms that have a superior past innovation performance, but that are failing in terms of recent R&D productivity and financial performance. A comparison of the performance of the targets with their acquirers reinforces this conclusion.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=70449350580&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cje/bep004

U2 - 10.1093/cje/bep004

DO - 10.1093/cje/bep004

M3 - Article

VL - 33

SP - 1089

EP - 1111

JO - Cambridge Journal of Economics

JF - Cambridge Journal of Economics

SN - 0309-166X

IS - 6

ER -