The relationship between challenge and threat states and performance:

A systematic review

Adrian Hase, Jessica O'Brien, Lee Moore, Paul Freeman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)
49 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The biopsychosocial model of challenge and threat states specifies that these states engender different physiological and behavioral responses in potentially stressful situations. This model has received growing interest in the sport and performance psychology literature. The present systematic review examined whether a challenge state is associated with superior performance than a threat state. Across 38 published studies that conceptualized challenge and threat states in a manner congruent with the biopsychosocial model, support emerged for the performance benefits of a challenge state. There was, however, significant variation in the reviewed studies in terms of the measures of challenge and threat states, tasks, and research designs. The benefits of a challenge state on performance were largely consistent across studies using cognitive, physiological, and dichotomous challenge and threat measures, cognitive and behavioral tasks, and direct experimental, indirect experimental, correlational, and quasi-experimental designs. The results imply that sports coaches, company directors, and teachers might benefit from trying to promote a challenge state in their athletes, employees, and students, respectively. Future research could benefit from a greater consensus on how best to measure challenge and threat states to help synthesize the evidence across studies. Specifically, we recommend that researchers use both cognitive and physiological measures and develop stronger manipulations for experimental studies. Finally, future research should report sufficient information to enable risk of bias assessment.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)123-144
Number of pages22
JournalSport, Exercise, and Performance Psychology
Volume8
Issue number2
Early online date7 Jun 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 May 2019

Fingerprint

Research Design
Athletic Performance
Athletes
Sports
Consensus
Research Personnel
Students
Mentoring
Sports Psychology

Cite this

The relationship between challenge and threat states and performance: A systematic review. / Hase, Adrian; O'Brien, Jessica; Moore, Lee; Freeman, Paul.

In: Sport, Exercise, and Performance Psychology, Vol. 8, No. 2, 01.05.2019, p. 123-144.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{dadbbe94d60a4d97a1fb1514929a9c9a,
title = "The relationship between challenge and threat states and performance:: A systematic review",
abstract = "The biopsychosocial model of challenge and threat states specifies that these states engender different physiological and behavioral responses in potentially stressful situations. This model has received growing interest in the sport and performance psychology literature. The present systematic review examined whether a challenge state is associated with superior performance than a threat state. Across 38 published studies that conceptualized challenge and threat states in a manner congruent with the biopsychosocial model, support emerged for the performance benefits of a challenge state. There was, however, significant variation in the reviewed studies in terms of the measures of challenge and threat states, tasks, and research designs. The benefits of a challenge state on performance were largely consistent across studies using cognitive, physiological, and dichotomous challenge and threat measures, cognitive and behavioral tasks, and direct experimental, indirect experimental, correlational, and quasi-experimental designs. The results imply that sports coaches, company directors, and teachers might benefit from trying to promote a challenge state in their athletes, employees, and students, respectively. Future research could benefit from a greater consensus on how best to measure challenge and threat states to help synthesize the evidence across studies. Specifically, we recommend that researchers use both cognitive and physiological measures and develop stronger manipulations for experimental studies. Finally, future research should report sufficient information to enable risk of bias assessment.",
author = "Adrian Hase and Jessica O'Brien and Lee Moore and Paul Freeman",
year = "2019",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1037/spy0000132",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
pages = "123--144",
journal = "Sport, Exercise, and Performance Psychology",
issn = "2157-3905",
publisher = "American Psychological Association",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The relationship between challenge and threat states and performance:

T2 - A systematic review

AU - Hase, Adrian

AU - O'Brien, Jessica

AU - Moore, Lee

AU - Freeman, Paul

PY - 2019/5/1

Y1 - 2019/5/1

N2 - The biopsychosocial model of challenge and threat states specifies that these states engender different physiological and behavioral responses in potentially stressful situations. This model has received growing interest in the sport and performance psychology literature. The present systematic review examined whether a challenge state is associated with superior performance than a threat state. Across 38 published studies that conceptualized challenge and threat states in a manner congruent with the biopsychosocial model, support emerged for the performance benefits of a challenge state. There was, however, significant variation in the reviewed studies in terms of the measures of challenge and threat states, tasks, and research designs. The benefits of a challenge state on performance were largely consistent across studies using cognitive, physiological, and dichotomous challenge and threat measures, cognitive and behavioral tasks, and direct experimental, indirect experimental, correlational, and quasi-experimental designs. The results imply that sports coaches, company directors, and teachers might benefit from trying to promote a challenge state in their athletes, employees, and students, respectively. Future research could benefit from a greater consensus on how best to measure challenge and threat states to help synthesize the evidence across studies. Specifically, we recommend that researchers use both cognitive and physiological measures and develop stronger manipulations for experimental studies. Finally, future research should report sufficient information to enable risk of bias assessment.

AB - The biopsychosocial model of challenge and threat states specifies that these states engender different physiological and behavioral responses in potentially stressful situations. This model has received growing interest in the sport and performance psychology literature. The present systematic review examined whether a challenge state is associated with superior performance than a threat state. Across 38 published studies that conceptualized challenge and threat states in a manner congruent with the biopsychosocial model, support emerged for the performance benefits of a challenge state. There was, however, significant variation in the reviewed studies in terms of the measures of challenge and threat states, tasks, and research designs. The benefits of a challenge state on performance were largely consistent across studies using cognitive, physiological, and dichotomous challenge and threat measures, cognitive and behavioral tasks, and direct experimental, indirect experimental, correlational, and quasi-experimental designs. The results imply that sports coaches, company directors, and teachers might benefit from trying to promote a challenge state in their athletes, employees, and students, respectively. Future research could benefit from a greater consensus on how best to measure challenge and threat states to help synthesize the evidence across studies. Specifically, we recommend that researchers use both cognitive and physiological measures and develop stronger manipulations for experimental studies. Finally, future research should report sufficient information to enable risk of bias assessment.

UR - http://psycnet.apa.org/fulltext/2018-26658-001.html

U2 - 10.1037/spy0000132

DO - 10.1037/spy0000132

M3 - Article

VL - 8

SP - 123

EP - 144

JO - Sport, Exercise, and Performance Psychology

JF - Sport, Exercise, and Performance Psychology

SN - 2157-3905

IS - 2

ER -