The politics of international chemical weapon justice:

The case of Syria, 2011-2017

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)
10 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

There has been near-universal condemnation of the use of chemical weapons in the Syrian conflict. The international community has nevertheless struggled to make progress on holding the perpetrators to account. This article reviews developments at the international level in terms of Syrian chemical weapon justice between 2011 and 2017. It argues that there have been substantive disagreements between states on the rationale and means of justice in the Syrian case. It also argues that international initiatives have been tightly intertwined with developments in chemical disarmament and conflict resolution processes as well as the broader war. The article describes progress and challenges to chemical weapon justice in a number of distinct formal international mechanisms during the period studied. The analysis concludes by contextualizing international responses—including the U.S. tomahawk strikes against a Syrian airbase—to the Khan Shaykhun chemical attacks of April 2017.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)280-297
Number of pages18
JournalContemporary Security Policy
Volume39
Issue number2
Early online date25 Jan 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 3 Apr 2018

Fingerprint

chemical weapon
Syria
justice
politics
disarmament
conflict resolution
community

Keywords

  • Civil war
  • United Nations
  • arms control and disarmament
  • international regimes
  • peacebuilding

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Political Science and International Relations

Cite this

The politics of international chemical weapon justice: The case of Syria, 2011-2017. / Edwards, Brett; Cacciatori, Mattia.

In: Contemporary Security Policy, Vol. 39, No. 2, 03.04.2018, p. 280-297.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{41497b40a29b4e6cbd130515fd975da8,
title = "The politics of international chemical weapon justice:: The case of Syria, 2011-2017",
abstract = "There has been near-universal condemnation of the use of chemical weapons in the Syrian conflict. The international community has nevertheless struggled to make progress on holding the perpetrators to account. This article reviews developments at the international level in terms of Syrian chemical weapon justice between 2011 and 2017. It argues that there have been substantive disagreements between states on the rationale and means of justice in the Syrian case. It also argues that international initiatives have been tightly intertwined with developments in chemical disarmament and conflict resolution processes as well as the broader war. The article describes progress and challenges to chemical weapon justice in a number of distinct formal international mechanisms during the period studied. The analysis concludes by contextualizing international responses—including the U.S. tomahawk strikes against a Syrian airbase—to the Khan Shaykhun chemical attacks of April 2017.",
keywords = "Civil war, United Nations, arms control and disarmament, international regimes, peacebuilding",
author = "Brett Edwards and Mattia Cacciatori",
year = "2018",
month = "4",
day = "3",
doi = "10.1080/13523260.2017.1410614",
language = "English",
volume = "39",
pages = "280--297",
journal = "Contemporary Security Policy",
issn = "1352-3260",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The politics of international chemical weapon justice:

T2 - The case of Syria, 2011-2017

AU - Edwards, Brett

AU - Cacciatori, Mattia

PY - 2018/4/3

Y1 - 2018/4/3

N2 - There has been near-universal condemnation of the use of chemical weapons in the Syrian conflict. The international community has nevertheless struggled to make progress on holding the perpetrators to account. This article reviews developments at the international level in terms of Syrian chemical weapon justice between 2011 and 2017. It argues that there have been substantive disagreements between states on the rationale and means of justice in the Syrian case. It also argues that international initiatives have been tightly intertwined with developments in chemical disarmament and conflict resolution processes as well as the broader war. The article describes progress and challenges to chemical weapon justice in a number of distinct formal international mechanisms during the period studied. The analysis concludes by contextualizing international responses—including the U.S. tomahawk strikes against a Syrian airbase—to the Khan Shaykhun chemical attacks of April 2017.

AB - There has been near-universal condemnation of the use of chemical weapons in the Syrian conflict. The international community has nevertheless struggled to make progress on holding the perpetrators to account. This article reviews developments at the international level in terms of Syrian chemical weapon justice between 2011 and 2017. It argues that there have been substantive disagreements between states on the rationale and means of justice in the Syrian case. It also argues that international initiatives have been tightly intertwined with developments in chemical disarmament and conflict resolution processes as well as the broader war. The article describes progress and challenges to chemical weapon justice in a number of distinct formal international mechanisms during the period studied. The analysis concludes by contextualizing international responses—including the U.S. tomahawk strikes against a Syrian airbase—to the Khan Shaykhun chemical attacks of April 2017.

KW - Civil war

KW - United Nations

KW - arms control and disarmament

KW - international regimes

KW - peacebuilding

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85043402966&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/13523260.2017.1410614

DO - 10.1080/13523260.2017.1410614

M3 - Article

VL - 39

SP - 280

EP - 297

JO - Contemporary Security Policy

JF - Contemporary Security Policy

SN - 1352-3260

IS - 2

ER -