Abstract
How do levels of cognitive household labor -- the "mental load'" involved in anticipating, fulfilling, and monitoring household needs -- affect political interest? The mental load is distinct from the physical tasks of e.g., cooking and cleaning, and thought to be disproportionately undertaken by women. I argue that while low levels of mental load can foster political interest, at high levels the mental (over)load crowds out cognitive space for political issues, especially issues seen to be distant from family life. To test this argument, I field a novel survey on politics and household work to a sample of parents in the United States. I find a large gender gap, with mothers reporting primary responsibility for 71 percent of cognitive household labor, compared to fathers' 45 percent. Low levels of mental load are positively linked to political interest, while high levels of mental load decrease interest in certain issues, including national politics and inflation. I report similar effects for fathers and mothers, but due to the gendered distribution of mental load (mothers carrying more load, on average), negative consequences are more common among mothers. The findings offer new evidence about a gender gap too often hidden, and its consequences for political life.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Journal | European Sociological Review |
Publication status | Acceptance date - 18 Mar 2025 |
Funding
This research was supported by the Carrie Chapman Catt Prize, Iowa State University, Bath's Institute for Policy Research, and the Department of Politics, Languages & International Studies at the University of Bath.
Keywords
- gender
- political participation
- Household
- gender and politics
- mental capacity