The policy dystopia model

an interpretive analysis of tobacco industry political activity

Selda Ulucanlar, Gary J. Fooks, Anna B. Gilmore

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

30 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background
Tobacco industry interference has been identified as the greatest obstacle to the implementation of evidence-based measures to reduce tobacco use. Understanding and addressing industry interference in public health policymaking is therefore crucial. Existing conceptualisations of corporate political activity (CPA) are embedded in a business perspective and do not attend to CPA’s social and public health costs; most have not drawn on the unique resource represented by internal tobacco industry documents. Building on this literature, including systematic reviews, we develop a critically informed conceptual model of tobacco industry political activity.

Methods and Findings
We thematically analysed published papers included in two systematic reviews examining tobacco industry influence on taxation and marketing of tobacco; we included 45 of 46 papers in the former and 20 of 48 papers in the latter (n:65). We used a Grounded Theory approach to build taxonomies of ‘discursive’ (argument based) and ‘instrumental’ (action based) industry strategies and from these devised the Policy Dystopia Model which shows that the industry, working through different constituencies, constructs a meta-narrative to argue that proposed policies will lead to a dysfunctional future of policy failure and widely dispersed adverse social and economic consequences. Simultaneously, it uses diverse, interlocking insider and outsider instrumental strategies to disseminate this narrative and enhance its persuasiveness in order to secure its preferred policy outcomes. Limitations are that many papers were historical (some dating back to the 1970s) and focus on high income regions.

Conclusions
The model provides an evidence based, accessible way of understanding diverse corporate political strategies. It should enable public health actors and officials to pre-empt these and develop realistic assessments of the industry’s claims.
Original languageEnglish
Article numbere1002125
Pages (from-to)1-21
Number of pages21
JournalPLoS Medicine
Volume13
Issue number9
Early online date20 Sep 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 20 Sep 2016

Fingerprint

Tobacco Industry
Politics
Industry
Public Health
Taxes
Tobacco Use
Marketing
Health Care Costs
Tobacco
Economics

Keywords

  • tobacco industry
  • Corporate political activity
  • public health policy
  • Policy Dystopia Model
  • taxation
  • marketing
  • regulation
  • structural power
  • discursive hegemony

Cite this

The policy dystopia model : an interpretive analysis of tobacco industry political activity. / Ulucanlar, Selda; Fooks, Gary J.; Gilmore, Anna B.

In: PLoS Medicine, Vol. 13, No. 9, e1002125, 20.09.2016, p. 1-21.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e7ad50510962427f8eb97246a0418e49,
title = "The policy dystopia model: an interpretive analysis of tobacco industry political activity",
abstract = "BackgroundTobacco industry interference has been identified as the greatest obstacle to the implementation of evidence-based measures to reduce tobacco use. Understanding and addressing industry interference in public health policymaking is therefore crucial. Existing conceptualisations of corporate political activity (CPA) are embedded in a business perspective and do not attend to CPA’s social and public health costs; most have not drawn on the unique resource represented by internal tobacco industry documents. Building on this literature, including systematic reviews, we develop a critically informed conceptual model of tobacco industry political activity. Methods and FindingsWe thematically analysed published papers included in two systematic reviews examining tobacco industry influence on taxation and marketing of tobacco; we included 45 of 46 papers in the former and 20 of 48 papers in the latter (n:65). We used a Grounded Theory approach to build taxonomies of ‘discursive’ (argument based) and ‘instrumental’ (action based) industry strategies and from these devised the Policy Dystopia Model which shows that the industry, working through different constituencies, constructs a meta-narrative to argue that proposed policies will lead to a dysfunctional future of policy failure and widely dispersed adverse social and economic consequences. Simultaneously, it uses diverse, interlocking insider and outsider instrumental strategies to disseminate this narrative and enhance its persuasiveness in order to secure its preferred policy outcomes. Limitations are that many papers were historical (some dating back to the 1970s) and focus on high income regions. ConclusionsThe model provides an evidence based, accessible way of understanding diverse corporate political strategies. It should enable public health actors and officials to pre-empt these and develop realistic assessments of the industry’s claims.",
keywords = "tobacco industry, Corporate political activity, public health policy, Policy Dystopia Model, taxation, marketing, regulation, structural power, discursive hegemony",
author = "Selda Ulucanlar and Fooks, {Gary J.} and Gilmore, {Anna B.}",
year = "2016",
month = "9",
day = "20",
doi = "10.1371/journal.pmed.1002125",
language = "English",
volume = "13",
pages = "1--21",
journal = "PLoS Medicine",
issn = "1549-1277",
publisher = "Nature Research",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The policy dystopia model

T2 - an interpretive analysis of tobacco industry political activity

AU - Ulucanlar, Selda

AU - Fooks, Gary J.

AU - Gilmore, Anna B.

PY - 2016/9/20

Y1 - 2016/9/20

N2 - BackgroundTobacco industry interference has been identified as the greatest obstacle to the implementation of evidence-based measures to reduce tobacco use. Understanding and addressing industry interference in public health policymaking is therefore crucial. Existing conceptualisations of corporate political activity (CPA) are embedded in a business perspective and do not attend to CPA’s social and public health costs; most have not drawn on the unique resource represented by internal tobacco industry documents. Building on this literature, including systematic reviews, we develop a critically informed conceptual model of tobacco industry political activity. Methods and FindingsWe thematically analysed published papers included in two systematic reviews examining tobacco industry influence on taxation and marketing of tobacco; we included 45 of 46 papers in the former and 20 of 48 papers in the latter (n:65). We used a Grounded Theory approach to build taxonomies of ‘discursive’ (argument based) and ‘instrumental’ (action based) industry strategies and from these devised the Policy Dystopia Model which shows that the industry, working through different constituencies, constructs a meta-narrative to argue that proposed policies will lead to a dysfunctional future of policy failure and widely dispersed adverse social and economic consequences. Simultaneously, it uses diverse, interlocking insider and outsider instrumental strategies to disseminate this narrative and enhance its persuasiveness in order to secure its preferred policy outcomes. Limitations are that many papers were historical (some dating back to the 1970s) and focus on high income regions. ConclusionsThe model provides an evidence based, accessible way of understanding diverse corporate political strategies. It should enable public health actors and officials to pre-empt these and develop realistic assessments of the industry’s claims.

AB - BackgroundTobacco industry interference has been identified as the greatest obstacle to the implementation of evidence-based measures to reduce tobacco use. Understanding and addressing industry interference in public health policymaking is therefore crucial. Existing conceptualisations of corporate political activity (CPA) are embedded in a business perspective and do not attend to CPA’s social and public health costs; most have not drawn on the unique resource represented by internal tobacco industry documents. Building on this literature, including systematic reviews, we develop a critically informed conceptual model of tobacco industry political activity. Methods and FindingsWe thematically analysed published papers included in two systematic reviews examining tobacco industry influence on taxation and marketing of tobacco; we included 45 of 46 papers in the former and 20 of 48 papers in the latter (n:65). We used a Grounded Theory approach to build taxonomies of ‘discursive’ (argument based) and ‘instrumental’ (action based) industry strategies and from these devised the Policy Dystopia Model which shows that the industry, working through different constituencies, constructs a meta-narrative to argue that proposed policies will lead to a dysfunctional future of policy failure and widely dispersed adverse social and economic consequences. Simultaneously, it uses diverse, interlocking insider and outsider instrumental strategies to disseminate this narrative and enhance its persuasiveness in order to secure its preferred policy outcomes. Limitations are that many papers were historical (some dating back to the 1970s) and focus on high income regions. ConclusionsThe model provides an evidence based, accessible way of understanding diverse corporate political strategies. It should enable public health actors and officials to pre-empt these and develop realistic assessments of the industry’s claims.

KW - tobacco industry

KW - Corporate political activity

KW - public health policy

KW - Policy Dystopia Model

KW - taxation

KW - marketing

KW - regulation

KW - structural power

KW - discursive hegemony

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002125

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002125

U2 - 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002125

DO - 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002125

M3 - Article

VL - 13

SP - 1

EP - 21

JO - PLoS Medicine

JF - PLoS Medicine

SN - 1549-1277

IS - 9

M1 - e1002125

ER -