The paradox of the ‘green’ prison

Sustaining the environment or sustaining the penal complex?

Yvonne Jewkes, Dominique Moran

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article examines the ways in which sustainability discourses intersect with carceral policies. Building new prisons to ‘green’ industry standards; making existing prison buildings less environmentally harmful; incorporating processes such as renewable energy initiatives; offering ‘green-collar’ work and training to prisoners; and providing ‘green care’ in an effort to reduce recidivism are all provided as evidence of ‘green’ strategies that shape the experience of prisoners, prison staff and the communities in which prisons are located. Although usually portrayed positively, this article proposes an alternative, potentially more contentious, interpretation of the green prison. In the context of mounting costs of incarceration, we suggest that green discourses perversely are fast becoming symbolic and material structures that frame and support mass imprisonment. Consequently, we argue, it may be the penal complex, rather than the environment, which is being ‘sustained’. Moreover, we suggest this is a topic worthy of attention from ‘green criminologists’.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)451-469
Number of pages19
JournalTheoretical Criminology
Volume19
Issue number4
Early online date30 Mar 2015
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2015

Keywords

  • Environmental harm
  • green criminology
  • green prisons
  • mass incarceration
  • sustainability

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Law

Cite this

The paradox of the ‘green’ prison : Sustaining the environment or sustaining the penal complex? / Jewkes, Yvonne; Moran, Dominique.

In: Theoretical Criminology, Vol. 19, No. 4, 01.11.2015, p. 451-469.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{8bd1c2c08d3b4350aaa7f50e5ce065d2,
title = "The paradox of the ‘green’ prison: Sustaining the environment or sustaining the penal complex?",
abstract = "This article examines the ways in which sustainability discourses intersect with carceral policies. Building new prisons to ‘green’ industry standards; making existing prison buildings less environmentally harmful; incorporating processes such as renewable energy initiatives; offering ‘green-collar’ work and training to prisoners; and providing ‘green care’ in an effort to reduce recidivism are all provided as evidence of ‘green’ strategies that shape the experience of prisoners, prison staff and the communities in which prisons are located. Although usually portrayed positively, this article proposes an alternative, potentially more contentious, interpretation of the green prison. In the context of mounting costs of incarceration, we suggest that green discourses perversely are fast becoming symbolic and material structures that frame and support mass imprisonment. Consequently, we argue, it may be the penal complex, rather than the environment, which is being ‘sustained’. Moreover, we suggest this is a topic worthy of attention from ‘green criminologists’.",
keywords = "Environmental harm, green criminology, green prisons, mass incarceration, sustainability",
author = "Yvonne Jewkes and Dominique Moran",
year = "2015",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1362480615576270",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
pages = "451--469",
journal = "Theoretical Criminology",
issn = "1362-4806",
publisher = "Sage Publications",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The paradox of the ‘green’ prison

T2 - Sustaining the environment or sustaining the penal complex?

AU - Jewkes, Yvonne

AU - Moran, Dominique

PY - 2015/11/1

Y1 - 2015/11/1

N2 - This article examines the ways in which sustainability discourses intersect with carceral policies. Building new prisons to ‘green’ industry standards; making existing prison buildings less environmentally harmful; incorporating processes such as renewable energy initiatives; offering ‘green-collar’ work and training to prisoners; and providing ‘green care’ in an effort to reduce recidivism are all provided as evidence of ‘green’ strategies that shape the experience of prisoners, prison staff and the communities in which prisons are located. Although usually portrayed positively, this article proposes an alternative, potentially more contentious, interpretation of the green prison. In the context of mounting costs of incarceration, we suggest that green discourses perversely are fast becoming symbolic and material structures that frame and support mass imprisonment. Consequently, we argue, it may be the penal complex, rather than the environment, which is being ‘sustained’. Moreover, we suggest this is a topic worthy of attention from ‘green criminologists’.

AB - This article examines the ways in which sustainability discourses intersect with carceral policies. Building new prisons to ‘green’ industry standards; making existing prison buildings less environmentally harmful; incorporating processes such as renewable energy initiatives; offering ‘green-collar’ work and training to prisoners; and providing ‘green care’ in an effort to reduce recidivism are all provided as evidence of ‘green’ strategies that shape the experience of prisoners, prison staff and the communities in which prisons are located. Although usually portrayed positively, this article proposes an alternative, potentially more contentious, interpretation of the green prison. In the context of mounting costs of incarceration, we suggest that green discourses perversely are fast becoming symbolic and material structures that frame and support mass imprisonment. Consequently, we argue, it may be the penal complex, rather than the environment, which is being ‘sustained’. Moreover, we suggest this is a topic worthy of attention from ‘green criminologists’.

KW - Environmental harm

KW - green criminology

KW - green prisons

KW - mass incarceration

KW - sustainability

U2 - 10.1177/1362480615576270

DO - 10.1177/1362480615576270

M3 - Article

VL - 19

SP - 451

EP - 469

JO - Theoretical Criminology

JF - Theoretical Criminology

SN - 1362-4806

IS - 4

ER -