The open society and its continual enemies

The need to re-balance education and develop a more critical attitude to knowledge and accepted practice

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaper

35 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

“The function of education, therefore, is to teach one to think intensively and to think critically. But education which stops with efficiency may prove the greatest menace to society.” Martin Luther King
This presentation asks, what prevents us from balancing education between efficiency and criticality?
To address this question, I use Popper’s theory of the Open Society to argue that the problems of our current education system are at least in part due to the construction of knowledge and education favouring a Closed Society. In this Closed Society, knowledge is not exposed to critical analysis, and debate in all but the closest of confines is restricted.
At the root of the Closed Society is Plato’s notion of the Republic, on which so many modern political theories and movements are founded. In this regime, instead of allowing a democratic consciousness to exist –an Open Society – Plato proposed a natural order of society, one in which his own aristocratic political class had a natural, inherent right to rule.
Therefore, it can be said that the Closed Society is one that favors individuals who make decisions, at the expense of those whose rights they are rhetorically defending – often those whose rights they say they are putting over their own. The Open Society, on the other hand, is one in which those who make decisions put the rights of those they are rhetorically securing ahead of their own, and which is genuinely self-less.
In education, I argue those who develop social norms and the knowledge that we teach in schools and colleges, still exploit what Popper argues are grey areas in belief. Therefore, in the process of developing knowledge for education, this need to regulate has culturally evolved into a need to institutionalize, classify and formalize. Furthermore, the social groupings and classifications that occur are mythologized, and lead to discrimination and social exclusion of children with what are referred to as Special Needs.
In this presentation, I also argue that classification is similarly based on a combination of mythological shared characteristics. These characteristics are defined as per institutional need. These mythological characteristics can also include: biological or social/cultural appearance, behavior, prowess and philosophy.
For example, some Western races and classes have traditionally emphasized physical prowess, strength and perceived intelligence. These are measured by IQ tests, which have artificially classified language and intelligence. Similarly, in the past intelligence and ethics have been linked with the ability to see, hear and speak formal language, and thus participate in education or acts of worship. Consequently, people who are deaf and blind have been thought to be less intelligent and ethical.
In this presentation I conclude, to rebalance our education we must go further than raising our children critically and efficiently. We must criticize our own ontologies and epistemologies, particularly those in our institutions and those of our own human classifications. Thus, in not self-analyzing the rules of our present, we disallow future generations from opening their minds and their societies.
Original languageEnglish
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2017
EventOXSCIE 2017 - Oxford Symposium for Comparative and International Education: Re-Examining the Mission of Education and the Meaning of Learning in an Uncertain World - Lady Margaret Hall, Oxford University, Oxford, UK United Kingdom
Duration: 8 Jun 20179 Jun 2017
http://www.oxfordcie.org/seminar

Conference

ConferenceOXSCIE 2017 - Oxford Symposium for Comparative and International Education
Abbreviated titleOXSCIE 2017
CountryUK United Kingdom
CityOxford
Period8/06/179/06/17
Internet address

Fingerprint

open society
education
intelligence
Plato
cultural behavior
efficiency
political movement
knowledge society
political theory
political elite
Social Norms
epistemology
grouping
ontology
education system
consciousness
republic
discrimination
exclusion
moral philosophy

Keywords

  • Popper
  • Open Society
  • Closed Society
  • Epistemology
  • Race
  • Education

Cite this

Hayhoe, S. (2017). The open society and its continual enemies: The need to re-balance education and develop a more critical attitude to knowledge and accepted practice. Paper presented at OXSCIE 2017 - Oxford Symposium for Comparative and International Education, Oxford, UK United Kingdom.

The open society and its continual enemies : The need to re-balance education and develop a more critical attitude to knowledge and accepted practice. / Hayhoe, Simon.

2017. Paper presented at OXSCIE 2017 - Oxford Symposium for Comparative and International Education, Oxford, UK United Kingdom.

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaper

Hayhoe, S 2017, 'The open society and its continual enemies: The need to re-balance education and develop a more critical attitude to knowledge and accepted practice' Paper presented at OXSCIE 2017 - Oxford Symposium for Comparative and International Education, Oxford, UK United Kingdom, 8/06/17 - 9/06/17, .
Hayhoe S. The open society and its continual enemies: The need to re-balance education and develop a more critical attitude to knowledge and accepted practice. 2017. Paper presented at OXSCIE 2017 - Oxford Symposium for Comparative and International Education, Oxford, UK United Kingdom.
Hayhoe, Simon. / The open society and its continual enemies : The need to re-balance education and develop a more critical attitude to knowledge and accepted practice. Paper presented at OXSCIE 2017 - Oxford Symposium for Comparative and International Education, Oxford, UK United Kingdom.
@conference{9d4469aea0bf4ca7a66bd045f3fb2b07,
title = "The open society and its continual enemies: The need to re-balance education and develop a more critical attitude to knowledge and accepted practice",
abstract = "“The function of education, therefore, is to teach one to think intensively and to think critically. But education which stops with efficiency may prove the greatest menace to society.” Martin Luther KingThis presentation asks, what prevents us from balancing education between efficiency and criticality?To address this question, I use Popper’s theory of the Open Society to argue that the problems of our current education system are at least in part due to the construction of knowledge and education favouring a Closed Society. In this Closed Society, knowledge is not exposed to critical analysis, and debate in all but the closest of confines is restricted.At the root of the Closed Society is Plato’s notion of the Republic, on which so many modern political theories and movements are founded. In this regime, instead of allowing a democratic consciousness to exist –an Open Society – Plato proposed a natural order of society, one in which his own aristocratic political class had a natural, inherent right to rule.Therefore, it can be said that the Closed Society is one that favors individuals who make decisions, at the expense of those whose rights they are rhetorically defending – often those whose rights they say they are putting over their own. The Open Society, on the other hand, is one in which those who make decisions put the rights of those they are rhetorically securing ahead of their own, and which is genuinely self-less.In education, I argue those who develop social norms and the knowledge that we teach in schools and colleges, still exploit what Popper argues are grey areas in belief. Therefore, in the process of developing knowledge for education, this need to regulate has culturally evolved into a need to institutionalize, classify and formalize. Furthermore, the social groupings and classifications that occur are mythologized, and lead to discrimination and social exclusion of children with what are referred to as Special Needs.In this presentation, I also argue that classification is similarly based on a combination of mythological shared characteristics. These characteristics are defined as per institutional need. These mythological characteristics can also include: biological or social/cultural appearance, behavior, prowess and philosophy.For example, some Western races and classes have traditionally emphasized physical prowess, strength and perceived intelligence. These are measured by IQ tests, which have artificially classified language and intelligence. Similarly, in the past intelligence and ethics have been linked with the ability to see, hear and speak formal language, and thus participate in education or acts of worship. Consequently, people who are deaf and blind have been thought to be less intelligent and ethical.In this presentation I conclude, to rebalance our education we must go further than raising our children critically and efficiently. We must criticize our own ontologies and epistemologies, particularly those in our institutions and those of our own human classifications. Thus, in not self-analyzing the rules of our present, we disallow future generations from opening their minds and their societies.",
keywords = "Popper, Open Society, Closed Society, Epistemology, Race, Education",
author = "Simon Hayhoe",
year = "2017",
month = "6",
day = "1",
language = "English",
note = "OXSCIE 2017 - Oxford Symposium for Comparative and International Education : Re-Examining the Mission of Education and the Meaning of Learning in an Uncertain World, OXSCIE 2017 ; Conference date: 08-06-2017 Through 09-06-2017",
url = "http://www.oxfordcie.org/seminar",

}

TY - CONF

T1 - The open society and its continual enemies

T2 - The need to re-balance education and develop a more critical attitude to knowledge and accepted practice

AU - Hayhoe, Simon

PY - 2017/6/1

Y1 - 2017/6/1

N2 - “The function of education, therefore, is to teach one to think intensively and to think critically. But education which stops with efficiency may prove the greatest menace to society.” Martin Luther KingThis presentation asks, what prevents us from balancing education between efficiency and criticality?To address this question, I use Popper’s theory of the Open Society to argue that the problems of our current education system are at least in part due to the construction of knowledge and education favouring a Closed Society. In this Closed Society, knowledge is not exposed to critical analysis, and debate in all but the closest of confines is restricted.At the root of the Closed Society is Plato’s notion of the Republic, on which so many modern political theories and movements are founded. In this regime, instead of allowing a democratic consciousness to exist –an Open Society – Plato proposed a natural order of society, one in which his own aristocratic political class had a natural, inherent right to rule.Therefore, it can be said that the Closed Society is one that favors individuals who make decisions, at the expense of those whose rights they are rhetorically defending – often those whose rights they say they are putting over their own. The Open Society, on the other hand, is one in which those who make decisions put the rights of those they are rhetorically securing ahead of their own, and which is genuinely self-less.In education, I argue those who develop social norms and the knowledge that we teach in schools and colleges, still exploit what Popper argues are grey areas in belief. Therefore, in the process of developing knowledge for education, this need to regulate has culturally evolved into a need to institutionalize, classify and formalize. Furthermore, the social groupings and classifications that occur are mythologized, and lead to discrimination and social exclusion of children with what are referred to as Special Needs.In this presentation, I also argue that classification is similarly based on a combination of mythological shared characteristics. These characteristics are defined as per institutional need. These mythological characteristics can also include: biological or social/cultural appearance, behavior, prowess and philosophy.For example, some Western races and classes have traditionally emphasized physical prowess, strength and perceived intelligence. These are measured by IQ tests, which have artificially classified language and intelligence. Similarly, in the past intelligence and ethics have been linked with the ability to see, hear and speak formal language, and thus participate in education or acts of worship. Consequently, people who are deaf and blind have been thought to be less intelligent and ethical.In this presentation I conclude, to rebalance our education we must go further than raising our children critically and efficiently. We must criticize our own ontologies and epistemologies, particularly those in our institutions and those of our own human classifications. Thus, in not self-analyzing the rules of our present, we disallow future generations from opening their minds and their societies.

AB - “The function of education, therefore, is to teach one to think intensively and to think critically. But education which stops with efficiency may prove the greatest menace to society.” Martin Luther KingThis presentation asks, what prevents us from balancing education between efficiency and criticality?To address this question, I use Popper’s theory of the Open Society to argue that the problems of our current education system are at least in part due to the construction of knowledge and education favouring a Closed Society. In this Closed Society, knowledge is not exposed to critical analysis, and debate in all but the closest of confines is restricted.At the root of the Closed Society is Plato’s notion of the Republic, on which so many modern political theories and movements are founded. In this regime, instead of allowing a democratic consciousness to exist –an Open Society – Plato proposed a natural order of society, one in which his own aristocratic political class had a natural, inherent right to rule.Therefore, it can be said that the Closed Society is one that favors individuals who make decisions, at the expense of those whose rights they are rhetorically defending – often those whose rights they say they are putting over their own. The Open Society, on the other hand, is one in which those who make decisions put the rights of those they are rhetorically securing ahead of their own, and which is genuinely self-less.In education, I argue those who develop social norms and the knowledge that we teach in schools and colleges, still exploit what Popper argues are grey areas in belief. Therefore, in the process of developing knowledge for education, this need to regulate has culturally evolved into a need to institutionalize, classify and formalize. Furthermore, the social groupings and classifications that occur are mythologized, and lead to discrimination and social exclusion of children with what are referred to as Special Needs.In this presentation, I also argue that classification is similarly based on a combination of mythological shared characteristics. These characteristics are defined as per institutional need. These mythological characteristics can also include: biological or social/cultural appearance, behavior, prowess and philosophy.For example, some Western races and classes have traditionally emphasized physical prowess, strength and perceived intelligence. These are measured by IQ tests, which have artificially classified language and intelligence. Similarly, in the past intelligence and ethics have been linked with the ability to see, hear and speak formal language, and thus participate in education or acts of worship. Consequently, people who are deaf and blind have been thought to be less intelligent and ethical.In this presentation I conclude, to rebalance our education we must go further than raising our children critically and efficiently. We must criticize our own ontologies and epistemologies, particularly those in our institutions and those of our own human classifications. Thus, in not self-analyzing the rules of our present, we disallow future generations from opening their minds and their societies.

KW - Popper

KW - Open Society

KW - Closed Society

KW - Epistemology

KW - Race

KW - Education

M3 - Paper

ER -