The Never-Ending Story: Discursive Legitimation in Social Media Dialogue

Sarah Glozer, Robert Caruana, Sally Hibbert

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This paper explores the dialogical dimensions of discursive legitimation in social media sites to understand how organisations produce knowledge of legitimacy in concert with their stakeholders. Drawing on the dialogical theories of Bakhtin and Nikulin, we consider the potential for conceptualising discursive legitimation as a product of dissent: an on-going ‘allosensual’ dialogue comprised of different voices and competing knowledge claims. We explore this through a micro-level analysis of organisation-led social media sites, wherein organisational practices are increasingly subjected to public scrutiny and where knowledge of legitimacy can be significantly shaped. Our dialogical lens highlights three inter-related functions of discursive legitimation. Discursive authorisation represents attempts to assume a credible ‘voice’ in-relation-to-‘other’ voices, within the dialogue. Discursive validation represents attempts to subject truth claims about legitimacy to rational, normative and moral verification. Finally, discursive finalisation represents attempts to harmonise dissent, either by co-opting or antagonising stakeholders towards consensus. Primarily, this paper unpacks the role of social media in legitimation processes, whilst also elaborating on organisational attempts to control stakeholder dialogue in online contexts.
LanguageEnglish
JournalOrganization Studies
Early online date23 Feb 2018
DOIs
StatusE-pub ahead of print - 23 Feb 2018

Fingerprint

Lenses
Lead
Legitimation
Social media
Legitimacy
Stakeholders
Dissent
Stakeholder dialogue
Authorization
Organizational practices
Levels of analysis

Keywords

  • Communication
  • Legitimacy
  • dialogue
  • Social Media
  • Allosensus

Cite this

The Never-Ending Story: Discursive Legitimation in Social Media Dialogue. / Glozer, Sarah; Caruana, Robert; Hibbert, Sally.

In: Organization Studies, 23.02.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{77a8cd9519284226bf5d7c9c72edf4e7,
title = "The Never-Ending Story: Discursive Legitimation in Social Media Dialogue",
abstract = "This paper explores the dialogical dimensions of discursive legitimation in social media sites to understand how organisations produce knowledge of legitimacy in concert with their stakeholders. Drawing on the dialogical theories of Bakhtin and Nikulin, we consider the potential for conceptualising discursive legitimation as a product of dissent: an on-going ‘allosensual’ dialogue comprised of different voices and competing knowledge claims. We explore this through a micro-level analysis of organisation-led social media sites, wherein organisational practices are increasingly subjected to public scrutiny and where knowledge of legitimacy can be significantly shaped. Our dialogical lens highlights three inter-related functions of discursive legitimation. Discursive authorisation represents attempts to assume a credible ‘voice’ in-relation-to-‘other’ voices, within the dialogue. Discursive validation represents attempts to subject truth claims about legitimacy to rational, normative and moral verification. Finally, discursive finalisation represents attempts to harmonise dissent, either by co-opting or antagonising stakeholders towards consensus. Primarily, this paper unpacks the role of social media in legitimation processes, whilst also elaborating on organisational attempts to control stakeholder dialogue in online contexts.",
keywords = "Communication, Legitimacy, dialogue, Social Media, Allosensus",
author = "Sarah Glozer and Robert Caruana and Sally Hibbert",
year = "2018",
month = "2",
day = "23",
doi = "10.1177/0170840617751006",
language = "English",
journal = "Organization Studies",
issn = "0170-8406",
publisher = "Sage Publications",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Never-Ending Story: Discursive Legitimation in Social Media Dialogue

AU - Glozer,Sarah

AU - Caruana,Robert

AU - Hibbert,Sally

PY - 2018/2/23

Y1 - 2018/2/23

N2 - This paper explores the dialogical dimensions of discursive legitimation in social media sites to understand how organisations produce knowledge of legitimacy in concert with their stakeholders. Drawing on the dialogical theories of Bakhtin and Nikulin, we consider the potential for conceptualising discursive legitimation as a product of dissent: an on-going ‘allosensual’ dialogue comprised of different voices and competing knowledge claims. We explore this through a micro-level analysis of organisation-led social media sites, wherein organisational practices are increasingly subjected to public scrutiny and where knowledge of legitimacy can be significantly shaped. Our dialogical lens highlights three inter-related functions of discursive legitimation. Discursive authorisation represents attempts to assume a credible ‘voice’ in-relation-to-‘other’ voices, within the dialogue. Discursive validation represents attempts to subject truth claims about legitimacy to rational, normative and moral verification. Finally, discursive finalisation represents attempts to harmonise dissent, either by co-opting or antagonising stakeholders towards consensus. Primarily, this paper unpacks the role of social media in legitimation processes, whilst also elaborating on organisational attempts to control stakeholder dialogue in online contexts.

AB - This paper explores the dialogical dimensions of discursive legitimation in social media sites to understand how organisations produce knowledge of legitimacy in concert with their stakeholders. Drawing on the dialogical theories of Bakhtin and Nikulin, we consider the potential for conceptualising discursive legitimation as a product of dissent: an on-going ‘allosensual’ dialogue comprised of different voices and competing knowledge claims. We explore this through a micro-level analysis of organisation-led social media sites, wherein organisational practices are increasingly subjected to public scrutiny and where knowledge of legitimacy can be significantly shaped. Our dialogical lens highlights three inter-related functions of discursive legitimation. Discursive authorisation represents attempts to assume a credible ‘voice’ in-relation-to-‘other’ voices, within the dialogue. Discursive validation represents attempts to subject truth claims about legitimacy to rational, normative and moral verification. Finally, discursive finalisation represents attempts to harmonise dissent, either by co-opting or antagonising stakeholders towards consensus. Primarily, this paper unpacks the role of social media in legitimation processes, whilst also elaborating on organisational attempts to control stakeholder dialogue in online contexts.

KW - Communication

KW - Legitimacy

KW - dialogue

KW - Social Media

KW - Allosensus

U2 - 10.1177/0170840617751006

DO - 10.1177/0170840617751006

M3 - Article

JO - Organization Studies

T2 - Organization Studies

JF - Organization Studies

SN - 0170-8406

ER -