The neoliberal regime in English higher education: Charters, consumers and the erosion of the public good

Rajani Naidoo, J Williams

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

44 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The restructuring of higher education (HE) according to neoliberal market principles has constructed the student consumer as a social category, thereby altering the nature, purpose and values of HE. In England, a key government attempt to champion the rights of the student consumer has taken the form of institutional charters which indicate the level of services students can expect to receive and what they will be expected to do in return. Pierre Bourdieu’s conceptual framework is applied to analyse the dynamics of practice in the context of the intensification of marketisation in English universities. The impact on student identities and learning processes, on the curriculum and on the academic practices of faculty is explored. By studying the production of institutional information related to charters, a particular image of the ‘good’ student is promoted to prospective students, which simultaneously regulates current student expectations. We argue that the marketisation of learning may result in passive and instrumental learners, a reduction in the range of disciplinary knowledge and a deterrence of innovation in teaching practices, all of which impact on the public good functions of universities.
LanguageEnglish
Pages208 - 223
Number of pages17
JournalCritical Studies in Education
Volume56
Issue number2
Early online date24 Jul 2014
DOIs
StatusPublished - 2014

Fingerprint

charter
erosion
regime
education
student
university
deterrence
teaching practice
learning process
restructuring
innovation
curriculum
market
learning
Values

Cite this

The neoliberal regime in English higher education : Charters, consumers and the erosion of the public good. / Naidoo, Rajani; Williams, J.

In: Critical Studies in Education, Vol. 56, No. 2, 2014, p. 208 - 223.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{6a69ffdfab6f40e0be88ff6528a63cc8,
title = "The neoliberal regime in English higher education: Charters, consumers and the erosion of the public good",
abstract = "The restructuring of higher education (HE) according to neoliberal market principles has constructed the student consumer as a social category, thereby altering the nature, purpose and values of HE. In England, a key government attempt to champion the rights of the student consumer has taken the form of institutional charters which indicate the level of services students can expect to receive and what they will be expected to do in return. Pierre Bourdieu’s conceptual framework is applied to analyse the dynamics of practice in the context of the intensification of marketisation in English universities. The impact on student identities and learning processes, on the curriculum and on the academic practices of faculty is explored. By studying the production of institutional information related to charters, a particular image of the ‘good’ student is promoted to prospective students, which simultaneously regulates current student expectations. We argue that the marketisation of learning may result in passive and instrumental learners, a reduction in the range of disciplinary knowledge and a deterrence of innovation in teaching practices, all of which impact on the public good functions of universities.",
author = "Rajani Naidoo and J Williams",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1080/17508487.2014.939098",
language = "English",
volume = "56",
pages = "208 -- 223",
journal = "Critical Studies in Education",
issn = "1750-8487",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The neoliberal regime in English higher education

T2 - Critical Studies in Education

AU - Naidoo, Rajani

AU - Williams, J

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - The restructuring of higher education (HE) according to neoliberal market principles has constructed the student consumer as a social category, thereby altering the nature, purpose and values of HE. In England, a key government attempt to champion the rights of the student consumer has taken the form of institutional charters which indicate the level of services students can expect to receive and what they will be expected to do in return. Pierre Bourdieu’s conceptual framework is applied to analyse the dynamics of practice in the context of the intensification of marketisation in English universities. The impact on student identities and learning processes, on the curriculum and on the academic practices of faculty is explored. By studying the production of institutional information related to charters, a particular image of the ‘good’ student is promoted to prospective students, which simultaneously regulates current student expectations. We argue that the marketisation of learning may result in passive and instrumental learners, a reduction in the range of disciplinary knowledge and a deterrence of innovation in teaching practices, all of which impact on the public good functions of universities.

AB - The restructuring of higher education (HE) according to neoliberal market principles has constructed the student consumer as a social category, thereby altering the nature, purpose and values of HE. In England, a key government attempt to champion the rights of the student consumer has taken the form of institutional charters which indicate the level of services students can expect to receive and what they will be expected to do in return. Pierre Bourdieu’s conceptual framework is applied to analyse the dynamics of practice in the context of the intensification of marketisation in English universities. The impact on student identities and learning processes, on the curriculum and on the academic practices of faculty is explored. By studying the production of institutional information related to charters, a particular image of the ‘good’ student is promoted to prospective students, which simultaneously regulates current student expectations. We argue that the marketisation of learning may result in passive and instrumental learners, a reduction in the range of disciplinary knowledge and a deterrence of innovation in teaching practices, all of which impact on the public good functions of universities.

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2014.939098

U2 - 10.1080/17508487.2014.939098

DO - 10.1080/17508487.2014.939098

M3 - Article

VL - 56

SP - 208

EP - 223

JO - Critical Studies in Education

JF - Critical Studies in Education

SN - 1750-8487

IS - 2

ER -