Abstract
The nature of the last universal common ancestor (LUCA), its age and its impact on the Earth system have been the subject of vigorous debate across diverse disciplines, often based on disparate data and methods. Age estimates for LUCA are usually based on the fossil record, varying with every reinterpretation. The nature of LUCA’s metabolism has proven equally contentious, with some attributing all core metabolisms to LUCA, whereas others reconstruct a simpler life form dependent on geochemistry. Here we infer that LUCA lived ~4.2 Ga (4.09–4.33 Ga) through divergence time analysis of pre-LUCA gene duplicates, calibrated using microbial fossils and isotope records under a new cross-bracing implementation. Phylogenetic reconciliation suggests that LUCA had a genome of at least 2.5 Mb (2.49–2.99 Mb), encoding around 2,600 proteins, comparable to modern prokaryotes. Our results suggest LUCA was a prokaryote-grade anaerobic acetogen that possessed an early immune system. Although LUCA is sometimes perceived as living in isolation, we infer LUCA to have been part of an established ecological system. The metabolism of LUCA would have provided a niche for other microbial community members and hydrogen recycling by atmospheric photochemistry could have supported a modestly productive early ecosystem.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1654-1666 |
Number of pages | 13 |
Journal | Nature Ecology and Evolution |
Volume | 8 |
Issue number | 9 |
Early online date | 12 Jul 2024 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 30 Sept 2024 |
Data Availability Statement
All data required to interpret, verify and extend the research in this article can be found at our figshare repository at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.24428659 (ref. 106) for the reconciliation and phylogenomic analyses and GitHub at https://github.com/sabifo4/LUCA-divtimes (ref. 107) for the molecular clock analyses. Additional data are available at the University of Bristol data repository, data.bris, at https://doi.org/10.5523/bris.405xnm7ei36d2cj65nrirg3ip (ref. 108).Funding
Our research is funded by the John Templeton Foundation (62220 to P.C.J.D., N.L., T.M.L., D.P., G.A.S., T.A.W. and Z.Y.; the opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the John Templeton Foundation), Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/T012773/1 to P.C.J.D. and Z.Y.; BB/T012951/1 to Z.Y.), by the European Research Council under the European Union\u2019s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (947317 ASymbEL to A.S.; 714774, GENECLOCKS to G.J.S.), Leverhulme Trust (RF-2022-167 to P.C.J.D.), Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation (GBMF9741 to T.A.W., D.P., P.C.J.D., A.S. and G.J.S.; GBMF9346 to A.S.), Royal Society (University Research Fellowship (URF) to T.A.W.), the Simons Foundation (735929LPI to A.S.) and the University of Bristol (University Research Fellowship (URF) to D.P.).
Funders | Funder number |
---|---|
GENECLOCKS | |
Royal Society | |
European Research Council | |
University of Bristol | |
Leverhulme Trust | RF-2022-167 |
Leverhulme Trust | |
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council | BB/T012951/1, BB/T012773/1 |
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council | |
John Templeton Foundation | 62220 |
John Templeton Foundation | |
Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation | GBMF9741, GBMF9346 |
Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation | |
Simons Foundation | 735929LPI |
Simons Foundation | |
Horizon 2020 Framework Programme | 947317 ASymbEL, 714774 |
Horizon 2020 Framework Programme |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
- Ecology