The migration patterns of two versions of the Furlong cementless femoral stem: a randomised, controlled trial using radiostereometric analysis

D. J. Simpson, B. J. Kendrick, M. Hughes, S. Glyn-Jones, H. S. Gill, G. F. Rushforth, D. W. Murray

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We have evaluated the difference in the migration patterns over two years of two cementless stems in a randomised, controlled trial using radiostereophotogrammetric analysis (RSA). The implants studied were the Furlong HAC stem, which has good long-term results and the Furlong Active stem, which is a modified version of the former designed to minimise stress concentrations between the implant and bone, and thus to improve fixation. A total of 23 Furlong HAC and 20 Furlong Active stems were implanted in 43 patients. RSA examinations were carried out immediately post-operatively and at six, 12 and 24 months post-operatively. The subsidence during the first year in the Furlong HAC stem, was approximately one-third that of the Furlong Active stem, the measured mean subsidence of the femoral head at six months being 0.27 mm (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.03 to 0.51) and 0.99 mm (95% CI 0.38 to 1.60), respectively (p = 0.03). One Active stem continued to subside during the second year. All hips, regardless of the type of stem were clinically successful as judged by the Oxford hip score and a derived pain score without any distinction between the two types of stem. The initial stability of the Furlong Active stem was not as good as the established stem which might compromise osseo-integration to the detriment of long-term success. The changes in the geometry of the stem, to minimise stress have affected the attainment of initial stability.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1356-1362
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume
Volume92
Issue number10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2010

Fingerprint

Radiostereometric Analysis
Thigh
Hip
Randomized Controlled Trials
Confidence Intervals
Bone and Bones
Pain

Cite this

The migration patterns of two versions of the Furlong cementless femoral stem: a randomised, controlled trial using radiostereometric analysis. / Simpson, D. J.; Kendrick, B. J.; Hughes, M.; Glyn-Jones, S.; Gill, H. S.; Rushforth, G. F.; Murray, D. W.

In: Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume, Vol. 92, No. 10, 2010, p. 1356-1362.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Simpson, D. J. ; Kendrick, B. J. ; Hughes, M. ; Glyn-Jones, S. ; Gill, H. S. ; Rushforth, G. F. ; Murray, D. W. / The migration patterns of two versions of the Furlong cementless femoral stem: a randomised, controlled trial using radiostereometric analysis. In: Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume. 2010 ; Vol. 92, No. 10. pp. 1356-1362.
@article{3c5767de31be4436bfda1c429aae15e4,
title = "The migration patterns of two versions of the Furlong cementless femoral stem: a randomised, controlled trial using radiostereometric analysis",
abstract = "We have evaluated the difference in the migration patterns over two years of two cementless stems in a randomised, controlled trial using radiostereophotogrammetric analysis (RSA). The implants studied were the Furlong HAC stem, which has good long-term results and the Furlong Active stem, which is a modified version of the former designed to minimise stress concentrations between the implant and bone, and thus to improve fixation. A total of 23 Furlong HAC and 20 Furlong Active stems were implanted in 43 patients. RSA examinations were carried out immediately post-operatively and at six, 12 and 24 months post-operatively. The subsidence during the first year in the Furlong HAC stem, was approximately one-third that of the Furlong Active stem, the measured mean subsidence of the femoral head at six months being 0.27 mm (95{\%} confidence interval (CI) 0.03 to 0.51) and 0.99 mm (95{\%} CI 0.38 to 1.60), respectively (p = 0.03). One Active stem continued to subside during the second year. All hips, regardless of the type of stem were clinically successful as judged by the Oxford hip score and a derived pain score without any distinction between the two types of stem. The initial stability of the Furlong Active stem was not as good as the established stem which might compromise osseo-integration to the detriment of long-term success. The changes in the geometry of the stem, to minimise stress have affected the attainment of initial stability.",
author = "Simpson, {D. J.} and Kendrick, {B. J.} and M. Hughes and S. Glyn-Jones and Gill, {H. S.} and Rushforth, {G. F.} and Murray, {D. W.}",
year = "2010",
doi = "10.1302/0301-620X.92B10.24399",
language = "English",
volume = "92",
pages = "1356--1362",
journal = "Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume",
issn = "0301-620X",
publisher = "British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The migration patterns of two versions of the Furlong cementless femoral stem: a randomised, controlled trial using radiostereometric analysis

AU - Simpson, D. J.

AU - Kendrick, B. J.

AU - Hughes, M.

AU - Glyn-Jones, S.

AU - Gill, H. S.

AU - Rushforth, G. F.

AU - Murray, D. W.

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - We have evaluated the difference in the migration patterns over two years of two cementless stems in a randomised, controlled trial using radiostereophotogrammetric analysis (RSA). The implants studied were the Furlong HAC stem, which has good long-term results and the Furlong Active stem, which is a modified version of the former designed to minimise stress concentrations between the implant and bone, and thus to improve fixation. A total of 23 Furlong HAC and 20 Furlong Active stems were implanted in 43 patients. RSA examinations were carried out immediately post-operatively and at six, 12 and 24 months post-operatively. The subsidence during the first year in the Furlong HAC stem, was approximately one-third that of the Furlong Active stem, the measured mean subsidence of the femoral head at six months being 0.27 mm (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.03 to 0.51) and 0.99 mm (95% CI 0.38 to 1.60), respectively (p = 0.03). One Active stem continued to subside during the second year. All hips, regardless of the type of stem were clinically successful as judged by the Oxford hip score and a derived pain score without any distinction between the two types of stem. The initial stability of the Furlong Active stem was not as good as the established stem which might compromise osseo-integration to the detriment of long-term success. The changes in the geometry of the stem, to minimise stress have affected the attainment of initial stability.

AB - We have evaluated the difference in the migration patterns over two years of two cementless stems in a randomised, controlled trial using radiostereophotogrammetric analysis (RSA). The implants studied were the Furlong HAC stem, which has good long-term results and the Furlong Active stem, which is a modified version of the former designed to minimise stress concentrations between the implant and bone, and thus to improve fixation. A total of 23 Furlong HAC and 20 Furlong Active stems were implanted in 43 patients. RSA examinations were carried out immediately post-operatively and at six, 12 and 24 months post-operatively. The subsidence during the first year in the Furlong HAC stem, was approximately one-third that of the Furlong Active stem, the measured mean subsidence of the femoral head at six months being 0.27 mm (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.03 to 0.51) and 0.99 mm (95% CI 0.38 to 1.60), respectively (p = 0.03). One Active stem continued to subside during the second year. All hips, regardless of the type of stem were clinically successful as judged by the Oxford hip score and a derived pain score without any distinction between the two types of stem. The initial stability of the Furlong Active stem was not as good as the established stem which might compromise osseo-integration to the detriment of long-term success. The changes in the geometry of the stem, to minimise stress have affected the attainment of initial stability.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77957834706&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&list_uids=20884971

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.92B10.24399

U2 - 10.1302/0301-620X.92B10.24399

DO - 10.1302/0301-620X.92B10.24399

M3 - Article

VL - 92

SP - 1356

EP - 1362

JO - Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume

JF - Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume

SN - 0301-620X

IS - 10

ER -