The measurement of habit

Amanda Rebar, Benjamin Gardner, Ryan Rhodes, Bas Verplanken

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

In this chapter, we put forth a theory-based set of criteria for a ‘good’ habit measure, encompassing predictive validity, discriminant validity, convergent validity, and reliability. We apply these criteria to evaluate prevalent measures of habit including past behaviour, frequency in context measures, and the Self-Report Habit Index and its derivatives (the Habit Index of Negative Thinking, and the Self-Report Behavioral Automaticity Index). We outline why implicit measures offer a potentially promising area for habit measurement research. Additionally, we highlight controversies in the habit domain, including the importance of distinguishing habit from behaviour and whether people can self-report habit. We conclude that the most appropriate habit measure is one that most aligns with the theoretical framework, research question, and logistical elements of the study.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationThe psychology of habit
Subtitle of host publicationTheory, mechanisms, change, and contexts
EditorsBas Verplanken
PublisherSpringer
Chapter3
Pages31-49
ISBN (Electronic)97833199752903
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

Rebar, A., Gardner, B., Rhodes, R., & Verplanken, B. (2018). The measurement of habit. In B. Verplanken (Ed.), The psychology of habit: Theory, mechanisms, change, and contexts (pp. 31-49). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97529-0_3

The measurement of habit. / Rebar, Amanda; Gardner, Benjamin; Rhodes, Ryan; Verplanken, Bas.

The psychology of habit: Theory, mechanisms, change, and contexts. ed. / Bas Verplanken. Springer, 2018. p. 31-49.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Rebar, A, Gardner, B, Rhodes, R & Verplanken, B 2018, The measurement of habit. in B Verplanken (ed.), The psychology of habit: Theory, mechanisms, change, and contexts. Springer, pp. 31-49. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97529-0_3
Rebar A, Gardner B, Rhodes R, Verplanken B. The measurement of habit. In Verplanken B, editor, The psychology of habit: Theory, mechanisms, change, and contexts. Springer. 2018. p. 31-49 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97529-0_3
Rebar, Amanda ; Gardner, Benjamin ; Rhodes, Ryan ; Verplanken, Bas. / The measurement of habit. The psychology of habit: Theory, mechanisms, change, and contexts. editor / Bas Verplanken. Springer, 2018. pp. 31-49
@inbook{e10869b098c04cac90268d8b0d7cc935,
title = "The measurement of habit",
abstract = "In this chapter, we put forth a theory-based set of criteria for a ‘good’ habit measure, encompassing predictive validity, discriminant validity, convergent validity, and reliability. We apply these criteria to evaluate prevalent measures of habit including past behaviour, frequency in context measures, and the Self-Report Habit Index and its derivatives (the Habit Index of Negative Thinking, and the Self-Report Behavioral Automaticity Index). We outline why implicit measures offer a potentially promising area for habit measurement research. Additionally, we highlight controversies in the habit domain, including the importance of distinguishing habit from behaviour and whether people can self-report habit. We conclude that the most appropriate habit measure is one that most aligns with the theoretical framework, research question, and logistical elements of the study.",
author = "Amanda Rebar and Benjamin Gardner and Ryan Rhodes and Bas Verplanken",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.1007/978-3-319-97529-0_3",
language = "English",
pages = "31--49",
editor = "Bas Verplanken",
booktitle = "The psychology of habit",
publisher = "Springer",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - The measurement of habit

AU - Rebar, Amanda

AU - Gardner, Benjamin

AU - Rhodes, Ryan

AU - Verplanken, Bas

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - In this chapter, we put forth a theory-based set of criteria for a ‘good’ habit measure, encompassing predictive validity, discriminant validity, convergent validity, and reliability. We apply these criteria to evaluate prevalent measures of habit including past behaviour, frequency in context measures, and the Self-Report Habit Index and its derivatives (the Habit Index of Negative Thinking, and the Self-Report Behavioral Automaticity Index). We outline why implicit measures offer a potentially promising area for habit measurement research. Additionally, we highlight controversies in the habit domain, including the importance of distinguishing habit from behaviour and whether people can self-report habit. We conclude that the most appropriate habit measure is one that most aligns with the theoretical framework, research question, and logistical elements of the study.

AB - In this chapter, we put forth a theory-based set of criteria for a ‘good’ habit measure, encompassing predictive validity, discriminant validity, convergent validity, and reliability. We apply these criteria to evaluate prevalent measures of habit including past behaviour, frequency in context measures, and the Self-Report Habit Index and its derivatives (the Habit Index of Negative Thinking, and the Self-Report Behavioral Automaticity Index). We outline why implicit measures offer a potentially promising area for habit measurement research. Additionally, we highlight controversies in the habit domain, including the importance of distinguishing habit from behaviour and whether people can self-report habit. We conclude that the most appropriate habit measure is one that most aligns with the theoretical framework, research question, and logistical elements of the study.

U2 - 10.1007/978-3-319-97529-0_3

DO - 10.1007/978-3-319-97529-0_3

M3 - Chapter

SP - 31

EP - 49

BT - The psychology of habit

A2 - Verplanken, Bas

PB - Springer

ER -