The Materials Revolution

Julian F V Vincent

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In the final essay of this series the gaps between biology and engineering are examined, and methods are suggested for crossing them. Creativity is seen as the essential, and TRIZ (the Russian Theory of Inventive Problem Solving) is recommended as the best set of methods both for stimulating creativity and for solving technical problems. When the catalogue of Inventive Principles of TRIZ is used to bring biology and technology to the same level of detail, the comparison shows that the similarity is only about 12%. The differences largely reside in the reliance of energy as a controlling parameter in conventional technology and the replacement of energy by information in biological systems. Although we might be moving slowly in this direction, a numerically based comparison such as this should provide more impetus. © 2006 Jilin University.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)217-234
Number of pages18
JournalJournal of Bionic Engineering
Volume3
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2006

Fingerprint

Creativity
Technology
Biological systems
Direction compound

Keywords

  • Biological systems
  • Materials science
  • Numerical methods
  • Problem solving
  • Reliability theory
  • Bionics

Cite this

The Materials Revolution. / Vincent, Julian F V.

In: Journal of Bionic Engineering, Vol. 3, No. 4, 2006, p. 217-234.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Vincent, Julian F V. / The Materials Revolution. In: Journal of Bionic Engineering. 2006 ; Vol. 3, No. 4. pp. 217-234.
@article{e08d49f4bffc4ca6ba05553031acc16f,
title = "The Materials Revolution",
abstract = "In the final essay of this series the gaps between biology and engineering are examined, and methods are suggested for crossing them. Creativity is seen as the essential, and TRIZ (the Russian Theory of Inventive Problem Solving) is recommended as the best set of methods both for stimulating creativity and for solving technical problems. When the catalogue of Inventive Principles of TRIZ is used to bring biology and technology to the same level of detail, the comparison shows that the similarity is only about 12{\%}. The differences largely reside in the reliance of energy as a controlling parameter in conventional technology and the replacement of energy by information in biological systems. Although we might be moving slowly in this direction, a numerically based comparison such as this should provide more impetus. {\circledC} 2006 Jilin University.",
keywords = "Biological systems, Materials science, Numerical methods, Problem solving, Reliability theory, Bionics",
author = "Vincent, {Julian F V}",
year = "2006",
doi = "10.1016/S1672-6529(07)60005-5",
language = "English",
volume = "3",
pages = "217--234",
journal = "Journal of Bionic Engineering",
issn = "1672-6529",
publisher = "Science Press",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Materials Revolution

AU - Vincent, Julian F V

PY - 2006

Y1 - 2006

N2 - In the final essay of this series the gaps between biology and engineering are examined, and methods are suggested for crossing them. Creativity is seen as the essential, and TRIZ (the Russian Theory of Inventive Problem Solving) is recommended as the best set of methods both for stimulating creativity and for solving technical problems. When the catalogue of Inventive Principles of TRIZ is used to bring biology and technology to the same level of detail, the comparison shows that the similarity is only about 12%. The differences largely reside in the reliance of energy as a controlling parameter in conventional technology and the replacement of energy by information in biological systems. Although we might be moving slowly in this direction, a numerically based comparison such as this should provide more impetus. © 2006 Jilin University.

AB - In the final essay of this series the gaps between biology and engineering are examined, and methods are suggested for crossing them. Creativity is seen as the essential, and TRIZ (the Russian Theory of Inventive Problem Solving) is recommended as the best set of methods both for stimulating creativity and for solving technical problems. When the catalogue of Inventive Principles of TRIZ is used to bring biology and technology to the same level of detail, the comparison shows that the similarity is only about 12%. The differences largely reside in the reliance of energy as a controlling parameter in conventional technology and the replacement of energy by information in biological systems. Although we might be moving slowly in this direction, a numerically based comparison such as this should provide more impetus. © 2006 Jilin University.

KW - Biological systems

KW - Materials science

KW - Numerical methods

KW - Problem solving

KW - Reliability theory

KW - Bionics

U2 - 10.1016/S1672-6529(07)60005-5

DO - 10.1016/S1672-6529(07)60005-5

M3 - Article

VL - 3

SP - 217

EP - 234

JO - Journal of Bionic Engineering

JF - Journal of Bionic Engineering

SN - 1672-6529

IS - 4

ER -