The long and the short of it

Local campaigning at the British 2010 General Election

R. Johnston, C. Pattie, J. Fisher, David Cutts, E. Fieldhouse

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Studies of recent British general elections have shown that the amount spent by candidates on their local campaigns was closely linked to the outcome in their constituencies; the more they spent the better their performance. Such research was hampered, however, by the short period for which spending returns were available; campaigning begins long before then. The 2010 election was the first for which candidate spending data were available for a longer period, when candidates could spend about two-and-a-half times as much as the legal limit for the 'short campaign' immediately preceding election day. This first detailed analysis of those data addresses variations in the amount spent across constituencies and their impact, focusing on whether spending on the two campaign periods had separate and independent impacts. Intensive local campaigning - as measured by the amount spent - during the long campaign provided a vote-winning foundation, on which the short campaign then built, especially for the two parties that raised the least money to spend in the months preceding the official campaign.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)105-128
Number of pages14
JournalPolitical Studies
Volume61
Issue numberS1
Early online date18 Mar 2013
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2013

Fingerprint

campaign
election
candidacy
voter
money
performance

Cite this

Johnston, R., Pattie, C., Fisher, J., Cutts, D., & Fieldhouse, E. (2013). The long and the short of it: Local campaigning at the British 2010 General Election. Political Studies, 61(S1), 105-128. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.12011

The long and the short of it : Local campaigning at the British 2010 General Election. / Johnston, R.; Pattie, C.; Fisher, J.; Cutts, David; Fieldhouse, E.

In: Political Studies, Vol. 61, No. S1, 04.2013, p. 105-128.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Johnston, R, Pattie, C, Fisher, J, Cutts, D & Fieldhouse, E 2013, 'The long and the short of it: Local campaigning at the British 2010 General Election', Political Studies, vol. 61, no. S1, pp. 105-128. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.12011
Johnston, R. ; Pattie, C. ; Fisher, J. ; Cutts, David ; Fieldhouse, E. / The long and the short of it : Local campaigning at the British 2010 General Election. In: Political Studies. 2013 ; Vol. 61, No. S1. pp. 105-128.
@article{2f4e481ea6ac49fcadfb3d78503b63f7,
title = "The long and the short of it: Local campaigning at the British 2010 General Election",
abstract = "Studies of recent British general elections have shown that the amount spent by candidates on their local campaigns was closely linked to the outcome in their constituencies; the more they spent the better their performance. Such research was hampered, however, by the short period for which spending returns were available; campaigning begins long before then. The 2010 election was the first for which candidate spending data were available for a longer period, when candidates could spend about two-and-a-half times as much as the legal limit for the 'short campaign' immediately preceding election day. This first detailed analysis of those data addresses variations in the amount spent across constituencies and their impact, focusing on whether spending on the two campaign periods had separate and independent impacts. Intensive local campaigning - as measured by the amount spent - during the long campaign provided a vote-winning foundation, on which the short campaign then built, especially for the two parties that raised the least money to spend in the months preceding the official campaign.",
author = "R. Johnston and C. Pattie and J. Fisher and David Cutts and E. Fieldhouse",
year = "2013",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1111/1467-9248.12011",
language = "English",
volume = "61",
pages = "105--128",
journal = "Political Studies",
issn = "0032-3217",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "S1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The long and the short of it

T2 - Local campaigning at the British 2010 General Election

AU - Johnston, R.

AU - Pattie, C.

AU - Fisher, J.

AU - Cutts, David

AU - Fieldhouse, E.

PY - 2013/4

Y1 - 2013/4

N2 - Studies of recent British general elections have shown that the amount spent by candidates on their local campaigns was closely linked to the outcome in their constituencies; the more they spent the better their performance. Such research was hampered, however, by the short period for which spending returns were available; campaigning begins long before then. The 2010 election was the first for which candidate spending data were available for a longer period, when candidates could spend about two-and-a-half times as much as the legal limit for the 'short campaign' immediately preceding election day. This first detailed analysis of those data addresses variations in the amount spent across constituencies and their impact, focusing on whether spending on the two campaign periods had separate and independent impacts. Intensive local campaigning - as measured by the amount spent - during the long campaign provided a vote-winning foundation, on which the short campaign then built, especially for the two parties that raised the least money to spend in the months preceding the official campaign.

AB - Studies of recent British general elections have shown that the amount spent by candidates on their local campaigns was closely linked to the outcome in their constituencies; the more they spent the better their performance. Such research was hampered, however, by the short period for which spending returns were available; campaigning begins long before then. The 2010 election was the first for which candidate spending data were available for a longer period, when candidates could spend about two-and-a-half times as much as the legal limit for the 'short campaign' immediately preceding election day. This first detailed analysis of those data addresses variations in the amount spent across constituencies and their impact, focusing on whether spending on the two campaign periods had separate and independent impacts. Intensive local campaigning - as measured by the amount spent - during the long campaign provided a vote-winning foundation, on which the short campaign then built, especially for the two parties that raised the least money to spend in the months preceding the official campaign.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84875358898&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1111/1467-9248.12011

U2 - 10.1111/1467-9248.12011

DO - 10.1111/1467-9248.12011

M3 - Article

VL - 61

SP - 105

EP - 128

JO - Political Studies

JF - Political Studies

SN - 0032-3217

IS - S1

ER -