The limits of 'choice': children and inner city schooling

D Reay, Helen Lucey

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  • 105 Citations

Abstract

This paper attempts to retheorize school 'choice'; to begin to unpack dominant contemporary misconceptions through an examination of the 'choices' available to 454 inner city 10 and 11 year-olds engaging in the process of primary-secondary school transfer in England. The prevalent focus within educational theorizing on 'choice' as a form of agency often masks the fact that 'choice' is a marker of economic privilege. The more distant subjects are from economic necessity the more `choice' becomes a possibility. In contrast, the majority of children in our research study had no 'choice' but to make a virtue out of necessity. They were forced to accept the least bad option. Particularly disadvantaged were the large numbers of refugees in the sample and those children, cutting across class and ethnicity, who chose 'against the grain'. We conclude that school 'choice' is an issue of power and constraint, of class and racial processes, although the possibilities of 'choice' cannot in any straightforward way be seen as conterminous with class positioning, implicating, as it does, both ethnicity and fractions and differences within classes as well as between them.
LanguageEnglish
Pages121-142
Number of pages22
JournalSociology-the Journal of the British Sociological Association
Volume37
Issue number1
DOIs
StatusPublished - 2003

Fingerprint

school choice
ethnicity
privilege
refugee
agricultural product
economics
primary school
secondary school
examination

Cite this

The limits of 'choice': children and inner city schooling. / Reay, D; Lucey, Helen.

In: Sociology-the Journal of the British Sociological Association, Vol. 37, No. 1, 2003, p. 121-142.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{a36aeb2e40094674b72558ff42a55cb9,
title = "The limits of 'choice': children and inner city schooling",
abstract = "This paper attempts to retheorize school 'choice'; to begin to unpack dominant contemporary misconceptions through an examination of the 'choices' available to 454 inner city 10 and 11 year-olds engaging in the process of primary-secondary school transfer in England. The prevalent focus within educational theorizing on 'choice' as a form of agency often masks the fact that 'choice' is a marker of economic privilege. The more distant subjects are from economic necessity the more `choice' becomes a possibility. In contrast, the majority of children in our research study had no 'choice' but to make a virtue out of necessity. They were forced to accept the least bad option. Particularly disadvantaged were the large numbers of refugees in the sample and those children, cutting across class and ethnicity, who chose 'against the grain'. We conclude that school 'choice' is an issue of power and constraint, of class and racial processes, although the possibilities of 'choice' cannot in any straightforward way be seen as conterminous with class positioning, implicating, as it does, both ethnicity and fractions and differences within classes as well as between them.",
author = "D Reay and Helen Lucey",
year = "2003",
doi = "10.1177/0038038503037001389",
language = "English",
volume = "37",
pages = "121--142",
journal = "Sociology",
issn = "0038-0385",
publisher = "Sage Publications",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The limits of 'choice': children and inner city schooling

AU - Reay,D

AU - Lucey,Helen

PY - 2003

Y1 - 2003

N2 - This paper attempts to retheorize school 'choice'; to begin to unpack dominant contemporary misconceptions through an examination of the 'choices' available to 454 inner city 10 and 11 year-olds engaging in the process of primary-secondary school transfer in England. The prevalent focus within educational theorizing on 'choice' as a form of agency often masks the fact that 'choice' is a marker of economic privilege. The more distant subjects are from economic necessity the more `choice' becomes a possibility. In contrast, the majority of children in our research study had no 'choice' but to make a virtue out of necessity. They were forced to accept the least bad option. Particularly disadvantaged were the large numbers of refugees in the sample and those children, cutting across class and ethnicity, who chose 'against the grain'. We conclude that school 'choice' is an issue of power and constraint, of class and racial processes, although the possibilities of 'choice' cannot in any straightforward way be seen as conterminous with class positioning, implicating, as it does, both ethnicity and fractions and differences within classes as well as between them.

AB - This paper attempts to retheorize school 'choice'; to begin to unpack dominant contemporary misconceptions through an examination of the 'choices' available to 454 inner city 10 and 11 year-olds engaging in the process of primary-secondary school transfer in England. The prevalent focus within educational theorizing on 'choice' as a form of agency often masks the fact that 'choice' is a marker of economic privilege. The more distant subjects are from economic necessity the more `choice' becomes a possibility. In contrast, the majority of children in our research study had no 'choice' but to make a virtue out of necessity. They were forced to accept the least bad option. Particularly disadvantaged were the large numbers of refugees in the sample and those children, cutting across class and ethnicity, who chose 'against the grain'. We conclude that school 'choice' is an issue of power and constraint, of class and racial processes, although the possibilities of 'choice' cannot in any straightforward way be seen as conterminous with class positioning, implicating, as it does, both ethnicity and fractions and differences within classes as well as between them.

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0038038503037001389

U2 - 10.1177/0038038503037001389

DO - 10.1177/0038038503037001389

M3 - Article

VL - 37

SP - 121

EP - 142

JO - Sociology

T2 - Sociology

JF - Sociology

SN - 0038-0385

IS - 1

ER -