TY - JOUR
T1 - The international universities walking project
T2 - Development of a framework for workplace intervention using the Delphi technique
AU - Brown, W J
AU - Faulkner, G
AU - McKenna, J
AU - Murphy, M
AU - Pringle, A
AU - Proper, K
AU - Puig-Ribera, A
AU - Stathi, Afroditi
AU - Umstattd, M R
PY - 2010/7
Y1 - 2010/7
N2 - Background: This paper aimed to use the Delphi technique to develop a consensus framework for a multinational, workplace walking intervention.
Methods: Ideas were gathered and ranked from eight recognized and emerging experts in the fields of physical activity and health, from universities in Australia, Canada, England, the Netherlands, Northern Ireland, and Spain. Members of the panel were asked to consider the key characteristics of a successful campus walking intervention. Consensus was reached by an inductive, content analytic approach, conducted through an anonymous, three-round, e-mail process.
Results: The resulting framework consisted of three interlinking themes defined as "design, implementation, and evaluation." Top-ranked subitems in these themes included the need to generate research capacity (design), to respond to group needs through different walking approaches (implementation), and to undertake physical activity assessment (evaluation). Themes were set within an underpinning domain, referred to as the "institution" and sites are currently engaging with subitems in this domain, to provide sustainable interventions that reflect the practicalities of local contexts and needs. Conclusions: Findings provide a unique framework for designing, implementing, and evaluating walking projects in universities and highlight the value of adopting the Delphi technique for planning international, multisite health initiatives.
AB - Background: This paper aimed to use the Delphi technique to develop a consensus framework for a multinational, workplace walking intervention.
Methods: Ideas were gathered and ranked from eight recognized and emerging experts in the fields of physical activity and health, from universities in Australia, Canada, England, the Netherlands, Northern Ireland, and Spain. Members of the panel were asked to consider the key characteristics of a successful campus walking intervention. Consensus was reached by an inductive, content analytic approach, conducted through an anonymous, three-round, e-mail process.
Results: The resulting framework consisted of three interlinking themes defined as "design, implementation, and evaluation." Top-ranked subitems in these themes included the need to generate research capacity (design), to respond to group needs through different walking approaches (implementation), and to undertake physical activity assessment (evaluation). Themes were set within an underpinning domain, referred to as the "institution" and sites are currently engaging with subitems in this domain, to provide sustainable interventions that reflect the practicalities of local contexts and needs. Conclusions: Findings provide a unique framework for designing, implementing, and evaluating walking projects in universities and highlight the value of adopting the Delphi technique for planning international, multisite health initiatives.
KW - program planning
KW - consensus
KW - physical activity
KW - ecological approach
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=67650797308&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://journals.humankinetics.com/jpah-back-issues/JPAHVolume6Issue4July
M3 - Article
SN - 1543-3080
VL - 6
SP - 520
EP - 528
JO - Journal of Physical Activity & Health
JF - Journal of Physical Activity & Health
IS - 4
ER -