Abstract
Millions of people in the developing world lack access to curative drugs. Pogge identifies the cause of this problem as a lack of redistribution across borders. In contrast, this article shows that institutional shortcomings within developing countries are the main issue. These different explanations are the result of diverging analytic approaches to ethics: a cosmopolitan approach versus an ordonomic approach. This article compares both approaches with regard to how they conceptualize and propose to solve the problem of providing life-saving pharmaceuticals to the poor in developing countries.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 73-89 |
Number of pages | 17 |
Journal | Journal of Global Ethics |
Volume | 7 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Apr 2011 |
Keywords
- global ethics
- global justice
- health care
- normativity
- ordonomics
- pharmaceuticals