The influence of surgical approach on cemented stem stability: an RSA study

S. Glyn-Jones, J. Alfaro-Adrian, D. W. Murray, H. S. Gill

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The surgical approach used is an important aspect of hip arthroplasty and will have an effect on the loading of the implant. Our goal was to establish whether there was a difference in early stem migration between the posterior and the lateral surgical approaches. The migration patterns of 45 Exeter stems in 45 patients were measured using radiostereometric analysis during a 2-year period; 19 of the stems were implanted using the posterior approach and 26 were implanted using the lateral approach. From postoperative radiostereometric measurements it was established that there was no difference in initial stem position between the two approaches. The posterior approach group had greater internal rotation of the stem, approximately 2 degrees during the first 2 years. The lateral group had almost 1/2 this amount of internal rotation. Overall stem subsidence was similar between the groups. These differences suggest that the lateral approach may give a survival advantage, especially for less rotationally stable stem designs and suboptimal cementing technique. The posterior approach gives rise to greater degree of internal rotation during the first 2 years. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level II. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)87-91
Number of pages5
JournalClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research
Volume448
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2006

Fingerprint

Radiostereometric Analysis
Arthroplasty
Hip
Guidelines
Survival
Therapeutics

Cite this

The influence of surgical approach on cemented stem stability: an RSA study. / Glyn-Jones, S.; Alfaro-Adrian, J.; Murray, D. W.; Gill, H. S.

In: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, Vol. 448, 2006, p. 87-91.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Glyn-Jones, S. ; Alfaro-Adrian, J. ; Murray, D. W. ; Gill, H. S. / The influence of surgical approach on cemented stem stability: an RSA study. In: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 2006 ; Vol. 448. pp. 87-91.
@article{33fca6e19400461fb0634cca448e4504,
title = "The influence of surgical approach on cemented stem stability: an RSA study",
abstract = "The surgical approach used is an important aspect of hip arthroplasty and will have an effect on the loading of the implant. Our goal was to establish whether there was a difference in early stem migration between the posterior and the lateral surgical approaches. The migration patterns of 45 Exeter stems in 45 patients were measured using radiostereometric analysis during a 2-year period; 19 of the stems were implanted using the posterior approach and 26 were implanted using the lateral approach. From postoperative radiostereometric measurements it was established that there was no difference in initial stem position between the two approaches. The posterior approach group had greater internal rotation of the stem, approximately 2 degrees during the first 2 years. The lateral group had almost 1/2 this amount of internal rotation. Overall stem subsidence was similar between the groups. These differences suggest that the lateral approach may give a survival advantage, especially for less rotationally stable stem designs and suboptimal cementing technique. The posterior approach gives rise to greater degree of internal rotation during the first 2 years. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level II. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.",
author = "S. Glyn-Jones and J. Alfaro-Adrian and Murray, {D. W.} and Gill, {H. S.}",
year = "2006",
doi = "10.1097/01.blo.0000224006.25636.cc",
language = "English",
volume = "448",
pages = "87--91",
journal = "Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research",
issn = "0009-921X",
publisher = "Springer New York",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The influence of surgical approach on cemented stem stability: an RSA study

AU - Glyn-Jones, S.

AU - Alfaro-Adrian, J.

AU - Murray, D. W.

AU - Gill, H. S.

PY - 2006

Y1 - 2006

N2 - The surgical approach used is an important aspect of hip arthroplasty and will have an effect on the loading of the implant. Our goal was to establish whether there was a difference in early stem migration between the posterior and the lateral surgical approaches. The migration patterns of 45 Exeter stems in 45 patients were measured using radiostereometric analysis during a 2-year period; 19 of the stems were implanted using the posterior approach and 26 were implanted using the lateral approach. From postoperative radiostereometric measurements it was established that there was no difference in initial stem position between the two approaches. The posterior approach group had greater internal rotation of the stem, approximately 2 degrees during the first 2 years. The lateral group had almost 1/2 this amount of internal rotation. Overall stem subsidence was similar between the groups. These differences suggest that the lateral approach may give a survival advantage, especially for less rotationally stable stem designs and suboptimal cementing technique. The posterior approach gives rise to greater degree of internal rotation during the first 2 years. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level II. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

AB - The surgical approach used is an important aspect of hip arthroplasty and will have an effect on the loading of the implant. Our goal was to establish whether there was a difference in early stem migration between the posterior and the lateral surgical approaches. The migration patterns of 45 Exeter stems in 45 patients were measured using radiostereometric analysis during a 2-year period; 19 of the stems were implanted using the posterior approach and 26 were implanted using the lateral approach. From postoperative radiostereometric measurements it was established that there was no difference in initial stem position between the two approaches. The posterior approach group had greater internal rotation of the stem, approximately 2 degrees during the first 2 years. The lateral group had almost 1/2 this amount of internal rotation. Overall stem subsidence was similar between the groups. These differences suggest that the lateral approach may give a survival advantage, especially for less rotationally stable stem designs and suboptimal cementing technique. The posterior approach gives rise to greater degree of internal rotation during the first 2 years. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level II. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

UR - http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&list_uids=16826101

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.blo.0000224006.25636.cc

U2 - 10.1097/01.blo.0000224006.25636.cc

DO - 10.1097/01.blo.0000224006.25636.cc

M3 - Article

VL - 448

SP - 87

EP - 91

JO - Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research

JF - Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research

SN - 0009-921X

ER -