The incumbent’s dilemma when exiting the firm: Torn between the family and the corporate logic

Melanie Richards, Nadine Kammerlander, Thomas Zellweger

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

When considering their own exit from the firm, incumbents are often challenged with two dilemmas. First, they need to hand over management to either a family-internal or a family-external successor. Second, they are often confronted with the trade-off between the successors’ levels of ability versus willingness, particularly when relying on family-internal candidates. Based on institutional logics literature we argue that these dilemmas arise as the corporate and the family logic lead to conflicting expectations regarding which exit route and which candidate to prefer. We hypothesize that past experiences, the level of education, and situational stimuli affect incumbents’ preferences for different succession candidates by focusing individual attention on either corporate or familial goals. In order to test our hypotheses we rely on responses to an exit scenario, completed by 2024 owner-managers of Swiss SMEs. Our findings contribute to literatures on entrepreneurial exit, institutional logics, and family firm succession.
Original languageEnglish
JournalAcademy of Management Best Paper Proceedings
Volume2014
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2014

Cite this

The incumbent’s dilemma when exiting the firm: Torn between the family and the corporate logic. / Richards, Melanie; Kammerlander, Nadine; Zellweger, Thomas.

In: Academy of Management Best Paper Proceedings, Vol. 2014, No. 1, 01.01.2014.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{2957c88854664b92a811be4c4c532332,
title = "The incumbent’s dilemma when exiting the firm: Torn between the family and the corporate logic",
abstract = "When considering their own exit from the firm, incumbents are often challenged with two dilemmas. First, they need to hand over management to either a family-internal or a family-external successor. Second, they are often confronted with the trade-off between the successors’ levels of ability versus willingness, particularly when relying on family-internal candidates. Based on institutional logics literature we argue that these dilemmas arise as the corporate and the family logic lead to conflicting expectations regarding which exit route and which candidate to prefer. We hypothesize that past experiences, the level of education, and situational stimuli affect incumbents’ preferences for different succession candidates by focusing individual attention on either corporate or familial goals. In order to test our hypotheses we rely on responses to an exit scenario, completed by 2024 owner-managers of Swiss SMEs. Our findings contribute to literatures on entrepreneurial exit, institutional logics, and family firm succession.",
author = "Melanie Richards and Nadine Kammerlander and Thomas Zellweger",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.5465/ambpp.2014.227",
language = "English",
volume = "2014",
journal = "Academy of Management Best Paper Proceedings",
issn = "0896-7911",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The incumbent’s dilemma when exiting the firm: Torn between the family and the corporate logic

AU - Richards, Melanie

AU - Kammerlander, Nadine

AU - Zellweger, Thomas

PY - 2014/1/1

Y1 - 2014/1/1

N2 - When considering their own exit from the firm, incumbents are often challenged with two dilemmas. First, they need to hand over management to either a family-internal or a family-external successor. Second, they are often confronted with the trade-off between the successors’ levels of ability versus willingness, particularly when relying on family-internal candidates. Based on institutional logics literature we argue that these dilemmas arise as the corporate and the family logic lead to conflicting expectations regarding which exit route and which candidate to prefer. We hypothesize that past experiences, the level of education, and situational stimuli affect incumbents’ preferences for different succession candidates by focusing individual attention on either corporate or familial goals. In order to test our hypotheses we rely on responses to an exit scenario, completed by 2024 owner-managers of Swiss SMEs. Our findings contribute to literatures on entrepreneurial exit, institutional logics, and family firm succession.

AB - When considering their own exit from the firm, incumbents are often challenged with two dilemmas. First, they need to hand over management to either a family-internal or a family-external successor. Second, they are often confronted with the trade-off between the successors’ levels of ability versus willingness, particularly when relying on family-internal candidates. Based on institutional logics literature we argue that these dilemmas arise as the corporate and the family logic lead to conflicting expectations regarding which exit route and which candidate to prefer. We hypothesize that past experiences, the level of education, and situational stimuli affect incumbents’ preferences for different succession candidates by focusing individual attention on either corporate or familial goals. In order to test our hypotheses we rely on responses to an exit scenario, completed by 2024 owner-managers of Swiss SMEs. Our findings contribute to literatures on entrepreneurial exit, institutional logics, and family firm succession.

U2 - 10.5465/ambpp.2014.227

DO - 10.5465/ambpp.2014.227

M3 - Article

VL - 2014

JO - Academy of Management Best Paper Proceedings

JF - Academy of Management Best Paper Proceedings

SN - 0896-7911

IS - 1

ER -