The impact of symptomatic hoarding in OCD and its treatment

Catherine Seaman, Victoria B Oldfield, Olivia Gordon, Elizabeth Forrester, Paul M Salkovskis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The value of defining subtypes in obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD) has become an important issue for recent debate. Probably the most robust example of subtyping is the identification of hoarding as being different both in terms of psychopathology and response to treatment.
Aims: To identify differences in psychopathology and treatment response in OCD patients with and without additional hoarding symptoms.
Method: Patients who had undertaken CBT for OCD were selected as falling into either a high or a low hoarding group. The high hoarding group (n = 18) was selected on the basis of a high score on the hoarding subscale of a self-report measure of OCD symptoms in addition to reaching clinician judged “threshold” on the hoarding item of the Obsessive Compulsive Personality Disorder (OCPD) SCID-II module. The low hoarding group (n = 20) was selected on the basis of a low score on the hoarding subscale and a clinician judgement that the hoarding item of the OCPD SCID-II module was “absent”.
Results: On some measures of pre-treatment psychopathology, patients with OCD with hoarding symptoms were more severely affected than those without hoarding symptoms. It was found that there was no difference in eventual treatment outcome between the two groups, although there was some evidence that the hoarding group showed greater symptom decreases.
Conclusions: The presence of hoarding symptoms does not negatively impact on the treatment of OCD.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)157-171
Number of pages15
JournalBehavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy
Volume38
Issue number02
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2010

Fingerprint

Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder
Compulsive Personality Disorder
Therapeutics
Psychopathology
Hoarding
Self Report

Cite this

The impact of symptomatic hoarding in OCD and its treatment. / Seaman, Catherine; Oldfield, Victoria B; Gordon, Olivia; Forrester, Elizabeth; Salkovskis, Paul M.

In: Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, Vol. 38, No. 02, 2010, p. 157-171.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Seaman, Catherine ; Oldfield, Victoria B ; Gordon, Olivia ; Forrester, Elizabeth ; Salkovskis, Paul M. / The impact of symptomatic hoarding in OCD and its treatment. In: Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy. 2010 ; Vol. 38, No. 02. pp. 157-171.
@article{6a5e11f77ff3457980cded67db52ec04,
title = "The impact of symptomatic hoarding in OCD and its treatment",
abstract = "Background: The value of defining subtypes in obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD) has become an important issue for recent debate. Probably the most robust example of subtyping is the identification of hoarding as being different both in terms of psychopathology and response to treatment. Aims: To identify differences in psychopathology and treatment response in OCD patients with and without additional hoarding symptoms. Method: Patients who had undertaken CBT for OCD were selected as falling into either a high or a low hoarding group. The high hoarding group (n = 18) was selected on the basis of a high score on the hoarding subscale of a self-report measure of OCD symptoms in addition to reaching clinician judged “threshold” on the hoarding item of the Obsessive Compulsive Personality Disorder (OCPD) SCID-II module. The low hoarding group (n = 20) was selected on the basis of a low score on the hoarding subscale and a clinician judgement that the hoarding item of the OCPD SCID-II module was “absent”. Results: On some measures of pre-treatment psychopathology, patients with OCD with hoarding symptoms were more severely affected than those without hoarding symptoms. It was found that there was no difference in eventual treatment outcome between the two groups, although there was some evidence that the hoarding group showed greater symptom decreases. Conclusions: The presence of hoarding symptoms does not negatively impact on the treatment of OCD.",
author = "Catherine Seaman and Oldfield, {Victoria B} and Olivia Gordon and Elizabeth Forrester and Salkovskis, {Paul M}",
year = "2010",
doi = "10.1017/S1352465809990695",
language = "English",
volume = "38",
pages = "157--171",
journal = "Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy",
issn = "1352-4658",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "02",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The impact of symptomatic hoarding in OCD and its treatment

AU - Seaman, Catherine

AU - Oldfield, Victoria B

AU - Gordon, Olivia

AU - Forrester, Elizabeth

AU - Salkovskis, Paul M

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - Background: The value of defining subtypes in obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD) has become an important issue for recent debate. Probably the most robust example of subtyping is the identification of hoarding as being different both in terms of psychopathology and response to treatment. Aims: To identify differences in psychopathology and treatment response in OCD patients with and without additional hoarding symptoms. Method: Patients who had undertaken CBT for OCD were selected as falling into either a high or a low hoarding group. The high hoarding group (n = 18) was selected on the basis of a high score on the hoarding subscale of a self-report measure of OCD symptoms in addition to reaching clinician judged “threshold” on the hoarding item of the Obsessive Compulsive Personality Disorder (OCPD) SCID-II module. The low hoarding group (n = 20) was selected on the basis of a low score on the hoarding subscale and a clinician judgement that the hoarding item of the OCPD SCID-II module was “absent”. Results: On some measures of pre-treatment psychopathology, patients with OCD with hoarding symptoms were more severely affected than those without hoarding symptoms. It was found that there was no difference in eventual treatment outcome between the two groups, although there was some evidence that the hoarding group showed greater symptom decreases. Conclusions: The presence of hoarding symptoms does not negatively impact on the treatment of OCD.

AB - Background: The value of defining subtypes in obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD) has become an important issue for recent debate. Probably the most robust example of subtyping is the identification of hoarding as being different both in terms of psychopathology and response to treatment. Aims: To identify differences in psychopathology and treatment response in OCD patients with and without additional hoarding symptoms. Method: Patients who had undertaken CBT for OCD were selected as falling into either a high or a low hoarding group. The high hoarding group (n = 18) was selected on the basis of a high score on the hoarding subscale of a self-report measure of OCD symptoms in addition to reaching clinician judged “threshold” on the hoarding item of the Obsessive Compulsive Personality Disorder (OCPD) SCID-II module. The low hoarding group (n = 20) was selected on the basis of a low score on the hoarding subscale and a clinician judgement that the hoarding item of the OCPD SCID-II module was “absent”. Results: On some measures of pre-treatment psychopathology, patients with OCD with hoarding symptoms were more severely affected than those without hoarding symptoms. It was found that there was no difference in eventual treatment outcome between the two groups, although there was some evidence that the hoarding group showed greater symptom decreases. Conclusions: The presence of hoarding symptoms does not negatively impact on the treatment of OCD.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77952533790&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1352465809990695

U2 - 10.1017/S1352465809990695

DO - 10.1017/S1352465809990695

M3 - Article

VL - 38

SP - 157

EP - 171

JO - Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy

JF - Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy

SN - 1352-4658

IS - 02

ER -