The impact of multidimensional physical activity feedback on healthcare practitioners and patients

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: Promotion of physical activity in primary care has had limited success. Wearable technology presents an opportunity to support healthcare practitioners (HCPs) with providing personalised feedback to their patients. Aim: To explore the differing thoughts and feelings of both HCPs and at-risk patients provided with personalised multidimensional physical activity feedback. Design and Setting: Qualitative study with HCPs (n=15) and patients at-risk of cardiovascular disease or type-2 diabetes (n=29) recruited from primary care. Method: HCPs and patients wore a physical activity monitor for 7-days and were subsequently shown their personalised multidimensional feedback including sedentary time, calorie burn, short (1-minute) or long (>10 minute) bouts of moderate-to-vigorous activity during semi-structured interviews. Transcripts were analysed thematically with comparisons made between individuals of high (n=21) and low (n=23) physical activity levels as to their cognitive-affective responses to their data. Results: Personalised feedback elicited positive emotional responses for highly active participants and negative emotional responses for those with low activity. However, individuals with low activity demonstrated largely positive coping mechanisms. Some low active participants were in denial over feedback however the majority valued it as an opportunity to think of ways to improve physical activity (cognitive reappraisal) and they started forming action plans (problem-focused coping). Around half of all participants also sought to validate their feedback against peers. Conclusion: Personalised, visual feedback elicits immediate emotional and coping responses in participants of high and low physical activity levels. Further studies should explore whether multidimensional feedback could help practitioners explore diverse ways for lifestyle change with patients.
Original languageEnglish
JournalBritish Journal of General Practice Open
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 2018

Cite this

@article{3e37520e9a88448e9f805c12080cc03c,
title = "The impact of multidimensional physical activity feedback on healthcare practitioners and patients",
abstract = "Background: Promotion of physical activity in primary care has had limited success. Wearable technology presents an opportunity to support healthcare practitioners (HCPs) with providing personalised feedback to their patients. Aim: To explore the differing thoughts and feelings of both HCPs and at-risk patients provided with personalised multidimensional physical activity feedback. Design and Setting: Qualitative study with HCPs (n=15) and patients at-risk of cardiovascular disease or type-2 diabetes (n=29) recruited from primary care. Method: HCPs and patients wore a physical activity monitor for 7-days and were subsequently shown their personalised multidimensional feedback including sedentary time, calorie burn, short (1-minute) or long (>10 minute) bouts of moderate-to-vigorous activity during semi-structured interviews. Transcripts were analysed thematically with comparisons made between individuals of high (n=21) and low (n=23) physical activity levels as to their cognitive-affective responses to their data. Results: Personalised feedback elicited positive emotional responses for highly active participants and negative emotional responses for those with low activity. However, individuals with low activity demonstrated largely positive coping mechanisms. Some low active participants were in denial over feedback however the majority valued it as an opportunity to think of ways to improve physical activity (cognitive reappraisal) and they started forming action plans (problem-focused coping). Around half of all participants also sought to validate their feedback against peers. Conclusion: Personalised, visual feedback elicits immediate emotional and coping responses in participants of high and low physical activity levels. Further studies should explore whether multidimensional feedback could help practitioners explore diverse ways for lifestyle change with patients.",
author = "Max Western and Dylan Thompson and Oliver Peacock and Afroditi Stathi",
year = "2018",
language = "English",
journal = "British Journal of General Practice Open",
issn = "2398-3795",
publisher = "Royal College of General Practitioners",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The impact of multidimensional physical activity feedback on healthcare practitioners and patients

AU - Western, Max

AU - Thompson, Dylan

AU - Peacock, Oliver

AU - Stathi, Afroditi

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - Background: Promotion of physical activity in primary care has had limited success. Wearable technology presents an opportunity to support healthcare practitioners (HCPs) with providing personalised feedback to their patients. Aim: To explore the differing thoughts and feelings of both HCPs and at-risk patients provided with personalised multidimensional physical activity feedback. Design and Setting: Qualitative study with HCPs (n=15) and patients at-risk of cardiovascular disease or type-2 diabetes (n=29) recruited from primary care. Method: HCPs and patients wore a physical activity monitor for 7-days and were subsequently shown their personalised multidimensional feedback including sedentary time, calorie burn, short (1-minute) or long (>10 minute) bouts of moderate-to-vigorous activity during semi-structured interviews. Transcripts were analysed thematically with comparisons made between individuals of high (n=21) and low (n=23) physical activity levels as to their cognitive-affective responses to their data. Results: Personalised feedback elicited positive emotional responses for highly active participants and negative emotional responses for those with low activity. However, individuals with low activity demonstrated largely positive coping mechanisms. Some low active participants were in denial over feedback however the majority valued it as an opportunity to think of ways to improve physical activity (cognitive reappraisal) and they started forming action plans (problem-focused coping). Around half of all participants also sought to validate their feedback against peers. Conclusion: Personalised, visual feedback elicits immediate emotional and coping responses in participants of high and low physical activity levels. Further studies should explore whether multidimensional feedback could help practitioners explore diverse ways for lifestyle change with patients.

AB - Background: Promotion of physical activity in primary care has had limited success. Wearable technology presents an opportunity to support healthcare practitioners (HCPs) with providing personalised feedback to their patients. Aim: To explore the differing thoughts and feelings of both HCPs and at-risk patients provided with personalised multidimensional physical activity feedback. Design and Setting: Qualitative study with HCPs (n=15) and patients at-risk of cardiovascular disease or type-2 diabetes (n=29) recruited from primary care. Method: HCPs and patients wore a physical activity monitor for 7-days and were subsequently shown their personalised multidimensional feedback including sedentary time, calorie burn, short (1-minute) or long (>10 minute) bouts of moderate-to-vigorous activity during semi-structured interviews. Transcripts were analysed thematically with comparisons made between individuals of high (n=21) and low (n=23) physical activity levels as to their cognitive-affective responses to their data. Results: Personalised feedback elicited positive emotional responses for highly active participants and negative emotional responses for those with low activity. However, individuals with low activity demonstrated largely positive coping mechanisms. Some low active participants were in denial over feedback however the majority valued it as an opportunity to think of ways to improve physical activity (cognitive reappraisal) and they started forming action plans (problem-focused coping). Around half of all participants also sought to validate their feedback against peers. Conclusion: Personalised, visual feedback elicits immediate emotional and coping responses in participants of high and low physical activity levels. Further studies should explore whether multidimensional feedback could help practitioners explore diverse ways for lifestyle change with patients.

M3 - Article

JO - British Journal of General Practice Open

JF - British Journal of General Practice Open

SN - 2398-3795

ER -