Abstract
In a recent article in World Development, Flyvbjerg confronted Hirschman's principle of the “Hiding Hand” and “providential” or “beneficial ignorance” (World Development Vol 84, pp 176–189). This states that development projects typically incur major cost overruns and other implementation problems, which put in question the decision to launch them in the first place. Indeed, had these difficulties been known in advance, the projects might never have been tried. Flyvbjerg challenges the empirical validity of this principle and the sloppiness of Hirschman's own argument. This rejoinder, while accepting that Hirschman presents his argument less than well, argues that Flyvbjerg is too quick to dismiss it, and that by taking account of Hirschman's scholarship more broadly, much of his approach remains valuable.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 366-368 |
| Number of pages | 3 |
| Journal | World Development |
| Volume | 103 |
| Early online date | 13 Nov 2017 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Mar 2018 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 8 Decent Work and Economic Growth
Keywords
- Hirschman
- strategy of economic development
- the Hiding Hand
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Geography, Planning and Development
- Development
- Sociology and Political Science
- Economics and Econometrics
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The Hiding Hand: A Rejoinder to Flyvbjerg on Hirschman'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS