The gendered effects of joint assessment for couples claiming means-tested benefits

Research output: Chapter or section in a book/report/conference proceedingBook chapter

Abstract

In most means-tested benefit systems, a couple’s needs, income and assets are aggregated in order to assess eligibility and the amount of entitlement. This system, based on outdated notions of financial support obligations between ‘husbands and wives’ and contested assumptions about income pooling, means that individuals in couples who share the same household have no independent right to means-tested benefits. This matters because empirical research shows that assessing eligibility and entitlement for means-tested benefits using the couple as the assessment unit can potentially restrict individual access to a personal income – affecting women in particular. This chapter explores joint assessment in means-tested, working-age benefits and its gendered effects on the distribution of resources inside female/male couple households. The issues raised, particularly for women but for partners in couples generally, are explored chiefly through the lens of United Kingdom working-age benefits. Options for reform are discussed, together with suggestions for future research.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationA Research Agenda for Financial Resources within the Household
EditorsFran Bennett, Silvia Avram, Siobhan Austen
Place of PublicationCheltenham, U. K.
PublisherEdward Elgar Publishing Ltd
Chapter14
Pages225-239
Number of pages15
ISBN (Electronic)9781802204001
ISBN (Print)9781802203998
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 18 Jan 2024

Publication series

NameElgar Research Agendas

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Economics, Econometrics and Finance(all)
  • General Business,Management and Accounting
  • General Social Sciences

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The gendered effects of joint assessment for couples claiming means-tested benefits'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this