Abstract
Murphy et al. (2022) raised concerns regarding the validity of the Four-Item Mentalising Index (FIMI). We wholeheartedly agree with Murphy et al. that there are problems in the social cognition literature hampering research. However, we maintain the FIMI is conceptually grounded in empirical and theoretical research, and that concerns regarding its construct validity are overstated. Drawing on recent research, we also discuss issues concerning the interpretation of discriminant validity analyses and discuss approaches to improve objectivity in future research. Overall, we argue that the FIMI is a conceptually and psychometrically sound measure, which has utility in future social cognition research and clinical practice.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 405-408 |
Number of pages | 4 |
Journal | Psychological Assessment |
Volume | 34 |
Issue number | 4 |
Early online date | 12 Apr 2022 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 30 Apr 2022 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2022. American Psychological Association
Keywords
- Autism
- Empathy
- Mentalising
- Self-report
- Theory of mind
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Clinical Psychology
- Psychiatry and Mental health