The First Swift Intensive AGN Accretion Disk Reverberation Mapping Survey

R. Edelson, J. Gelbord, E. Cackett, B. M. Peterson, K. Horne, A. J. Barth, D. A. Starkey, M. Bentz, W. N. Brandt, M. Goad, M. Joner, K. Korista, H. Netzer, K. Page, P. Uttley, S. Vaughan, A. Breeveld, S. B. Cenko, C. Done, P. EvansM. Fausnaugh, G. Ferland, D. Gonzalez-Buitrago, J. Gropp, D. Grupe, J. Kaastra, J. Kennea, G. Kriss, S. Mathur, M. Mehdipour, D. Mudd, J. Nousek, T. Schmidt, M. Vestergaard, C. Villforth

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)
18 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Swift intensive accretion disk reverberation mapping of four AGN yielded light curves sampled ∼200-350 times in 0.3-10 keV X-ray and six UV/optical bands. Uniform reduction and cross-correlation analysis of these data sets yields three main results: (1) The X-ray/UV correlations are much weaker than those within the UV/optical, posing severe problems for the lamp-post reprocessing model in which variations in a central X-ray corona drive and power those in the surrounding accretion disk. (2) The UV/optical interband lags are generally consistent with as predicted by the centrally illuminated thin accretion disk model. While the average interband lags are somewhat larger than predicted, these results alone are not inconsistent with the thin disk model given the large systematic uncertainties involved. (3) The one exception is the U band lags, which are on average a factor of ∼2.2 larger than predicted from the surrounding band data and fits. This excess appears to be due to diffuse continuum emission from the broad-line region (BLR). The precise mixing of disk and BLR components cannot be determined from these data alone. The lags in different AGN appear to scale with mass or luminosity. We also find that there are systematic differences between the uncertainties derived by JAVELIN versus more standard lag measurement techniques, with JAVELIN reporting smaller uncertainties by a factor of 2.5 on average. In order to be conservative only standard techniques were used in the analyses reported herein.

Original languageEnglish
Article number123
JournalAstrophysical Journal
Volume870
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 16 Jan 2019

Keywords

  • galaxies: active
  • galaxies: nuclei
  • galaxies: Seyfert

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
  • Space and Planetary Science

Cite this

Edelson, R., Gelbord, J., Cackett, E., Peterson, B. M., Horne, K., Barth, A. J., ... Villforth, C. (2019). The First Swift Intensive AGN Accretion Disk Reverberation Mapping Survey. Astrophysical Journal, 870(2), [123]. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aaf3b4

The First Swift Intensive AGN Accretion Disk Reverberation Mapping Survey. / Edelson, R.; Gelbord, J.; Cackett, E.; Peterson, B. M.; Horne, K.; Barth, A. J.; Starkey, D. A.; Bentz, M.; Brandt, W. N.; Goad, M.; Joner, M.; Korista, K.; Netzer, H.; Page, K.; Uttley, P.; Vaughan, S.; Breeveld, A.; Cenko, S. B.; Done, C.; Evans, P.; Fausnaugh, M.; Ferland, G.; Gonzalez-Buitrago, D.; Gropp, J.; Grupe, D.; Kaastra, J.; Kennea, J.; Kriss, G.; Mathur, S.; Mehdipour, M.; Mudd, D.; Nousek, J.; Schmidt, T.; Vestergaard, M.; Villforth, C.

In: Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 870, No. 2, 123, 16.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Edelson, R, Gelbord, J, Cackett, E, Peterson, BM, Horne, K, Barth, AJ, Starkey, DA, Bentz, M, Brandt, WN, Goad, M, Joner, M, Korista, K, Netzer, H, Page, K, Uttley, P, Vaughan, S, Breeveld, A, Cenko, SB, Done, C, Evans, P, Fausnaugh, M, Ferland, G, Gonzalez-Buitrago, D, Gropp, J, Grupe, D, Kaastra, J, Kennea, J, Kriss, G, Mathur, S, Mehdipour, M, Mudd, D, Nousek, J, Schmidt, T, Vestergaard, M & Villforth, C 2019, 'The First Swift Intensive AGN Accretion Disk Reverberation Mapping Survey', Astrophysical Journal, vol. 870, no. 2, 123. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aaf3b4
Edelson R, Gelbord J, Cackett E, Peterson BM, Horne K, Barth AJ et al. The First Swift Intensive AGN Accretion Disk Reverberation Mapping Survey. Astrophysical Journal. 2019 Jan 16;870(2). 123. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aaf3b4
Edelson, R. ; Gelbord, J. ; Cackett, E. ; Peterson, B. M. ; Horne, K. ; Barth, A. J. ; Starkey, D. A. ; Bentz, M. ; Brandt, W. N. ; Goad, M. ; Joner, M. ; Korista, K. ; Netzer, H. ; Page, K. ; Uttley, P. ; Vaughan, S. ; Breeveld, A. ; Cenko, S. B. ; Done, C. ; Evans, P. ; Fausnaugh, M. ; Ferland, G. ; Gonzalez-Buitrago, D. ; Gropp, J. ; Grupe, D. ; Kaastra, J. ; Kennea, J. ; Kriss, G. ; Mathur, S. ; Mehdipour, M. ; Mudd, D. ; Nousek, J. ; Schmidt, T. ; Vestergaard, M. ; Villforth, C. / The First Swift Intensive AGN Accretion Disk Reverberation Mapping Survey. In: Astrophysical Journal. 2019 ; Vol. 870, No. 2.
@article{94cb4b0269a5406d8a536e4db705ab7f,
title = "The First Swift Intensive AGN Accretion Disk Reverberation Mapping Survey",
abstract = "Swift intensive accretion disk reverberation mapping of four AGN yielded light curves sampled ∼200-350 times in 0.3-10 keV X-ray and six UV/optical bands. Uniform reduction and cross-correlation analysis of these data sets yields three main results: (1) The X-ray/UV correlations are much weaker than those within the UV/optical, posing severe problems for the lamp-post reprocessing model in which variations in a central X-ray corona drive and power those in the surrounding accretion disk. (2) The UV/optical interband lags are generally consistent with as predicted by the centrally illuminated thin accretion disk model. While the average interband lags are somewhat larger than predicted, these results alone are not inconsistent with the thin disk model given the large systematic uncertainties involved. (3) The one exception is the U band lags, which are on average a factor of ∼2.2 larger than predicted from the surrounding band data and fits. This excess appears to be due to diffuse continuum emission from the broad-line region (BLR). The precise mixing of disk and BLR components cannot be determined from these data alone. The lags in different AGN appear to scale with mass or luminosity. We also find that there are systematic differences between the uncertainties derived by JAVELIN versus more standard lag measurement techniques, with JAVELIN reporting smaller uncertainties by a factor of 2.5 on average. In order to be conservative only standard techniques were used in the analyses reported herein.",
keywords = "galaxies: active, galaxies: nuclei, galaxies: Seyfert",
author = "R. Edelson and J. Gelbord and E. Cackett and Peterson, {B. M.} and K. Horne and Barth, {A. J.} and Starkey, {D. A.} and M. Bentz and Brandt, {W. N.} and M. Goad and M. Joner and K. Korista and H. Netzer and K. Page and P. Uttley and S. Vaughan and A. Breeveld and Cenko, {S. B.} and C. Done and P. Evans and M. Fausnaugh and G. Ferland and D. Gonzalez-Buitrago and J. Gropp and D. Grupe and J. Kaastra and J. Kennea and G. Kriss and S. Mathur and M. Mehdipour and D. Mudd and J. Nousek and T. Schmidt and M. Vestergaard and C. Villforth",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "16",
doi = "10.3847/1538-4357/aaf3b4",
language = "English",
volume = "870",
journal = "Astrophysical Journal",
issn = "0004-637X",
publisher = "IOP Publishing",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The First Swift Intensive AGN Accretion Disk Reverberation Mapping Survey

AU - Edelson, R.

AU - Gelbord, J.

AU - Cackett, E.

AU - Peterson, B. M.

AU - Horne, K.

AU - Barth, A. J.

AU - Starkey, D. A.

AU - Bentz, M.

AU - Brandt, W. N.

AU - Goad, M.

AU - Joner, M.

AU - Korista, K.

AU - Netzer, H.

AU - Page, K.

AU - Uttley, P.

AU - Vaughan, S.

AU - Breeveld, A.

AU - Cenko, S. B.

AU - Done, C.

AU - Evans, P.

AU - Fausnaugh, M.

AU - Ferland, G.

AU - Gonzalez-Buitrago, D.

AU - Gropp, J.

AU - Grupe, D.

AU - Kaastra, J.

AU - Kennea, J.

AU - Kriss, G.

AU - Mathur, S.

AU - Mehdipour, M.

AU - Mudd, D.

AU - Nousek, J.

AU - Schmidt, T.

AU - Vestergaard, M.

AU - Villforth, C.

PY - 2019/1/16

Y1 - 2019/1/16

N2 - Swift intensive accretion disk reverberation mapping of four AGN yielded light curves sampled ∼200-350 times in 0.3-10 keV X-ray and six UV/optical bands. Uniform reduction and cross-correlation analysis of these data sets yields three main results: (1) The X-ray/UV correlations are much weaker than those within the UV/optical, posing severe problems for the lamp-post reprocessing model in which variations in a central X-ray corona drive and power those in the surrounding accretion disk. (2) The UV/optical interband lags are generally consistent with as predicted by the centrally illuminated thin accretion disk model. While the average interband lags are somewhat larger than predicted, these results alone are not inconsistent with the thin disk model given the large systematic uncertainties involved. (3) The one exception is the U band lags, which are on average a factor of ∼2.2 larger than predicted from the surrounding band data and fits. This excess appears to be due to diffuse continuum emission from the broad-line region (BLR). The precise mixing of disk and BLR components cannot be determined from these data alone. The lags in different AGN appear to scale with mass or luminosity. We also find that there are systematic differences between the uncertainties derived by JAVELIN versus more standard lag measurement techniques, with JAVELIN reporting smaller uncertainties by a factor of 2.5 on average. In order to be conservative only standard techniques were used in the analyses reported herein.

AB - Swift intensive accretion disk reverberation mapping of four AGN yielded light curves sampled ∼200-350 times in 0.3-10 keV X-ray and six UV/optical bands. Uniform reduction and cross-correlation analysis of these data sets yields three main results: (1) The X-ray/UV correlations are much weaker than those within the UV/optical, posing severe problems for the lamp-post reprocessing model in which variations in a central X-ray corona drive and power those in the surrounding accretion disk. (2) The UV/optical interband lags are generally consistent with as predicted by the centrally illuminated thin accretion disk model. While the average interband lags are somewhat larger than predicted, these results alone are not inconsistent with the thin disk model given the large systematic uncertainties involved. (3) The one exception is the U band lags, which are on average a factor of ∼2.2 larger than predicted from the surrounding band data and fits. This excess appears to be due to diffuse continuum emission from the broad-line region (BLR). The precise mixing of disk and BLR components cannot be determined from these data alone. The lags in different AGN appear to scale with mass or luminosity. We also find that there are systematic differences between the uncertainties derived by JAVELIN versus more standard lag measurement techniques, with JAVELIN reporting smaller uncertainties by a factor of 2.5 on average. In order to be conservative only standard techniques were used in the analyses reported herein.

KW - galaxies: active

KW - galaxies: nuclei

KW - galaxies: Seyfert

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85060195774&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3847/1538-4357/aaf3b4

DO - 10.3847/1538-4357/aaf3b4

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85060195774

VL - 870

JO - Astrophysical Journal

JF - Astrophysical Journal

SN - 0004-637X

IS - 2

M1 - 123

ER -